• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Thinking About Going E85

  • Thread starter Thread starter wideopenthrottle
  • Start date Start date Sep 8, 2014

wideopenthrottle

New Member
Jul 22, 2014
3
0
1
Sep 8, 2014
#1
  • Sep 8, 2014
  • #1
So I'm at the decision making time in my build. Chassis/diffwork done tranny and motor is next.

I have put together the following parts through Craigslist/swap meets/ trades:
-afr 185s 58cc no heat crossover
-new untouched cobra upper & lower (will be match ported to heads)
-Anderson power pipe
-dbx85mm
-accufab 75mm tb
-American thunder flows2.5 inch
-bbk 1 5/8 2.5 inch collector headers
-will have a custom X pipe made with cut outs after the crossover 2.5 inch
-scat 347 crank (new)
-scat h beams (new)
-python 44lbs Injectors
-1.6 roller rockers
-will have a custom ground cam ( when I decide where I am headed I.e.e85 or not)

I know it's gonna be a .30 over motor but I am wondering if my intake/head setup would be able to achieve enough flow and timing to be able to run e85. I was thinking of getting some -6 or -9 cc pistons (head gasket will vary) to put my compression up to 12 to 1. I know it will req a tune need to figure that out open to suggestions.

My goals are low 11s bc it's a vert. I would like the car to make peak power @6k rpm since the valve springs and intake are limited to that. This is not an everyday driver it's a weekend/track car but I'd like it to be dependable.

Just wondering if 12 to 1 is doable with what I have in terms of timing rqd/ flow if it's not i may just build an 11:1 flat top motor and buy smaller injectors. Help tips appreciated .
 

Madmardigan

New Member
Jul 31, 2014
29
1
3
Sep 8, 2014
#2
  • Sep 8, 2014
  • #2
You may need new fuel lines, tank, and pump.

E85 doesn't like normal fuel systems.

My 13 F150 5.0 is flex, but I can't find it anywhere.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Sep 8, 2014
#3
  • Sep 8, 2014
  • #3
You are going to have to replace every part of your fuel system. On an n/a application I don't see the benefit.
 

larrym1961

5 Year Member
Dec 18, 2010
570
36
49
Idaho Falls Id
Sep 8, 2014
#4
  • Sep 8, 2014
  • #4
There is another Stangnet member, Grover Dill who has 1100 HP twin turbo Mustang that runs strictly on E85. Maybe you can message him and ask him what mods he did to his Mustang to convert to E85.

I do know that the area he lives in, he too has the problem of availability of E85 fuel.
 

wideopenthrottle

New Member
Jul 22, 2014
3
0
1
Sep 8, 2014
#5
  • Sep 8, 2014
  • #5
Availability isn't an issue there's enough around me.

Replacing lines isn't a big deal I think. Everything I'm reading is saying to replace all rubber lines which isn't too much, basically only @2-3feet to tank and rails.

Fuel Pump will Be upgraded to push the injectors, even through I think the car has a walboro 255lph.
 

Micheal Nadeau

Active Member
Dec 30, 2013
258
32
49
Savannah, GA
Sep 8, 2014
#6
  • Sep 8, 2014
  • #6
Aside from octane, I don't see any benefit to E85. Let it sit too long and its attracts a crap load of moisture and will ruin fuel systems.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Sep 8, 2014
#7
  • Sep 8, 2014
  • #7
The best route I see is an aftermarket computer, or starting out with a late model flex fuel computer. The problem I see is getting the stock computer, narrow band O2 sensors and stock injectors to get the amount of fuel right. While I do not know the complete list of changed parts to make a Flex Fuel vehicle, lambda with E85 requires much more fuel per air than gasoline. If you can overcome the extra fuel flow requirement, programming issues, and the problems with alcohol comparability with plastics, metals and rubber, the motor will run just as strong, and in my experience, cooler and smoother on E85. The mileage will stink, but the fuel is a bit cheaper.
I think our van and a truck I worked on have stainless fuel lines. Our Guru wrote that good quality aluminum lines should be fine.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Sep 8, 2014
#8
  • Sep 8, 2014
  • #8
This is a case where a carb set up would be easier/cheaper. Jets and an accelerator pump are easier and cheaper to change than injectors.
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Sep 9, 2014
#9
  • Sep 9, 2014
  • #9
I agree with above. I think E85 is overkill and not worth it in your application. Also, the Conra intake will not be enough for your goal. Get a systemax, eddy rpm II, or maybe even a TFS R.

Joe
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
373
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
149
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
712
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
542
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
M
Engine 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
500
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 28, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?