• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Those who dyno'd over 200rwhp with stock cam and heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter twotonefreak
  • Start date Start date Jan 8, 2004

twotonefreak

New Member
Feb 23, 2003
161
0
0
Fortsmith,AR
Jan 8, 2004
#1
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #1
Hey guys just wondering for those who have dyno'd over 200 rwhp with a stock and heads, it seems that everyone of them had a larger maf, and intake, do you also have a custom or mail order chip, or tweecer type set up? Just curious as to how big of a restriction the stock maf is? A
 

984.6gt

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
2,806
0
46
Sugar Land
Jan 8, 2004
#2
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #2
200HP, you mean 300 right?
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Jan 8, 2004
#3
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #3
well about the meter....i dont think the stock meter is a hugh bottle neck....really its not gonna give you many ponies on stock H/C car i dont think




Anthony
 

fiveotony

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
1,437
0
0
Gainesville, Ga
Jan 8, 2004
#4
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #4
ona dyno I picked up close to 8RWHP with a bullett MAF meter from pro-m when I had stock heads, cam and a cobra intake and a power pipe with a k and n.
 
J

jetuomi

Founding Member
Jan 30, 2002
1,464
0
0
Toronto, ON
Jan 8, 2004
#5
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #5
I'm 220 rwhp with 3 mods.. EFI extender (10* timing), O/R H-pipe, pulleys.. I think with full exhaust, maf, and intake I could be like 250 rear-wheel..
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Jan 8, 2004
#6
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #6
Mods are in sig, stock heads and cam, smog legal with cats, untouched computer

255rwhp engine cold and running very lean.

Dyno numbers in sig where with car near operating temp.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Jan 8, 2004
#7
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #7
Mods are in the sig stock heads and cam
249rwhp

292rwtq
 

slvrbullit302

New Member
Jan 6, 2004
986
1
0
Alabama
Jan 8, 2004
#8
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #8
when i first dynoed my car it made 214rwhp and 277rwtq with stock heads, cam and intake. Only mods at the time were eq. shortys, pro chamber, cat back, pullies and cold air. Untouched computer, and timing set at 14*.

On the nitrous with the same set-up above it made 312rwhp and 460 rwtq off a 100 shot.
 
S

shallto

Founding Member
Jun 1, 2001
464
0
16
OBX, NC
Jan 8, 2004
#9
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #9
I had cat-back, pullies, and Cold air intake. I also have an AOD. I put down 202hp and 268tq. This is a fox body. I expected it to be lower so I was happy. Can't wait to get it dynoed again.
 

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
Dothan,Al
Jan 8, 2004
#10
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #10
If you guys are putting down that kind of power i wonder what i should be putting down, i do not have pullies, but you can check the sig for what i do have, also when the car goes back together in a week or so it will have an O/R x-pipe and a mac dump set-up to go with my headers.


someon please look at my sig and take a random guess.


thanks

jason
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Jan 9, 2004
#11
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #11
mytight95 said:
If you guys are putting down that kind of power i wonder what i should be putting down, i do not have pullies, but you can check the sig for what i do have, also when the car goes back together in a week or so it will have an O/R x-pipe and a mac dump set-up to go with my headers.


someon please look at my sig and take a random guess.


thanks

jason
Click to expand...
I think maybe like 250 or so to the wheels. The Ecam should help some.
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Jan 9, 2004
#12
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #12
230.2hp 293.2lb/ft

bbk ceramic u/l shorties
bbk o/r h
flowmaster american thunder
gt40 tubular intake w/ ported lower
bbk 70mm t/b
mac cai
asp underdrives

stock computer
stock mass air
stock heads
stock cam

my car probably could have managed more without the porting with a 65mm t/b but i knew my combo was going to use it later so i bought big to start with.
 

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
Dothan,Al
Jan 9, 2004
#13
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #13
you really think i could manage about 250 to the wheels, thats what 285 - 290 at the crank


jason
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
T
Newbie here with an odd story
  • thequadfather
  • Jul 20, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
627
The Welcome Wagon Jul 22, 2024
thequadfather
T
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
804
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?