• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Throttle Body Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jeff_D_2385
  • Start date Start date May 5, 2008
J

Jeff_D_2385

New Member
Oct 9, 2003
16
0
0
May 5, 2008
#1
  • May 5, 2008
  • #1
I'm new to the whole performance upgrade and aftermarket scene but I'm getting that $600 check from the rebate thing and some graduation from college money and want to start.

I was looking at a throttle body and then a throttle body spacer.. what the difference between the two and is it a good place to start as terms of ease of installation? I was also looking at cold air intake and will that fit with the new throttle body/spacer?
 
P

PSYKOSTEVO

Banned
Apr 11, 2008
194
0
0
May 5, 2008
#2
  • May 5, 2008
  • #2
I will have to speak from my experience with throttle body spacers on EFI cars. They are almost 100% useless. Almost........but the key word is USELESS.

And the Throttle Body is not a very restrictive place to start. You will want to do the intake and tune first, and if you can afford to, get an exhaust. Those are your basics, and they will make you very happy. Once the butt-dyno stops registering all the thrill from those mods then it will be time to step up to bigger mods. But nothing really nets you that change quite like the Intake/tune/exhaust combo.

Then there are superchargers and nitrous for later on after you learn a little bit more about modifications. Think later.

Oh, and congrats on Graduating from college. I graduated three years ago from Arizona State University, damn I'm glad that's over.
 

whyask

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
735
1
0
Sacramento
May 5, 2008
#3
  • May 5, 2008
  • #3
yeh... useless is the word i would use too

intake and tune (brenspeed) 500 - 550 $
exhaust (mid pipe and mufflers) 600 $
gears (3:73 & 4:10) 400 W/ install

you can do all for under 1500
And you will think its a differnt car ! WELL WORHT IT !
 

Towelly

New Member
May 9, 2006
174
0
0
May 6, 2008
#4
  • May 6, 2008
  • #4
I just installed my C&L Racer Intake and SCT XCAL2 tune from brenspeed. I can tell you that it was worth every penny. The car should have come like this from the factory.
 

Redfire 05

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
236
0
0
Lubbock, TX
May 6, 2008
#5
  • May 6, 2008
  • #5
I would totally agree that the TB spacer is not worth it. If you are looking at first mods to make to your car follow the advice already given. The CAI and tune is the best bang for the buck for our cars. Here are the gains you can expect based on tests from magazines and other sources I've collected and saved. These are just peak numbers most will help throughout the rpm range. In the case of the shorties they help mostly a lot at lower rpms.

1. Cold Air Intake
CAI w/o tune 10-15 rwhp $250-$300
CAI and Tune 20-30 rwhp $550 +
2. Throttle Body 6-8 rwhp $280-350
3. Underdrive Pulleys 6-8 rwhp $180-250
4. Headers
Shorty Headers 3-5 rwhp $300+
Long Tube Headers 10-15 rwhp $450+
5. X-Pipe w/ or w/o cats 8-12 rwhp $150+ w/o cats or $300+ w cats
 

05wolfkiller

Member
Sep 4, 2006
114
0
16
pearland, texas
May 6, 2008
#6
  • May 6, 2008
  • #6
skip the throttle body. that first $600 should definitely go toward a cai and tuner imo
 

jt14894

Member
Apr 6, 2005
66
3
9
Florida
May 19, 2008
#7
  • May 19, 2008
  • #7
I have a Predator tuner and would like to get a CAI/w tune, but with the price of 93 octane hitting $4.00+ a gallon. It ain't worth it.
 
P

PSYKOSTEVO

Banned
Apr 11, 2008
194
0
0
May 19, 2008
#8
  • May 19, 2008
  • #8
jt14894 said:
I have a Predator tuner and would like to get a CAI/w tune, but with the price of 93 octane hitting $4.00+ a gallon. It ain't worth it.
Click to expand...

I disagree with you on that. I'll pay $0.20 more per gallon, which is about $0.01 per mile when you think about it. To drive a tuned car vs. stock. The Extra 50hp from the intake/tune/O/R pype/exhaust is much appreciated by me.

The car felt like a Ford Taurus before all of those mods, and now it feels like a mustang. Hell, the stock tune limits how far the throttle-body can open, delays the pedal response, drops timing through what they refer to as an "octane plug", reduces torque output through a limiter, and doesn't properly utilize the Variable Cam Phasing.

Think about this.....the higher the base price of gas gets, the smaller the % of that price it is to upgrade to premium.

When gas was $1.30 and premium was $1.50 it cost 16% more to upgrade.

Now at $3.70 a gallon and $3.90 for premium it costs 5% more to upgrade to premium.
 

jt14894

Member
Apr 6, 2005
66
3
9
Florida
May 19, 2008
#9
  • May 19, 2008
  • #9
PSYKOSTEVO said:
I disagree with you on that. I'll pay $0.20 more per gallon, which is about $0.01 per mile when you think about it. To drive a tuned car vs. stock. The Extra 50hp from the intake/tune/O/R pype/exhaust is much appreciated by me.

The car felt like a Ford Taurus before all of those mods, and now it feels like a mustang. Hell, the stock tune limits how far the throttle-body can open, delays the pedal response, drops timing through what they refer to as an "octane plug", reduces torque output through a limiter, and doesn't properly utilize the Variable Cam Phasing.

Think about this.....the higher the base price of gas gets, the smaller the % of that price it is to upgrade to premium.

When gas was $1.30 and premium was $1.50 it cost 16% more to upgrade.

Now at $3.70 a gallon and $3.90 for premium it costs 5% more to upgrade to premium.
Click to expand...

Ok. So you disagree. Fine. I'm not really into heavy mods as you and so I lean towards getting the most out of a tank full because of the ever increasing gas prices.
So with all these mods, have you experienced any increase over stock as far as average MPG or mileage range per tank full?
 
P

PSYKOSTEVO

Banned
Apr 11, 2008
194
0
0
May 19, 2008
#10
  • May 19, 2008
  • #10
jt14894 said:
Ok. So you disagree. Fine. I'm not really into heavy mods as you and so I lean towards getting the most out of a tank full because of the ever increasing gas prices.
So with all these mods, have you experienced any increase over stock as far as average MPG or mileage range per tank full?
Click to expand...

Yes, I have experienced a up to 3 mpg difference on highway. Most of my driving is highway driving to and from work. used to get 19mpg, now get 21-23mpg. Basically at $0.20 per gallon all you need to do to break even is gain mpg. Obviously if I drive my car hard my MPG will be crappy.

If you look at paying $3.70 for regular and get 20mpg you pay $0.185 per mile.

If you upgrade to premium and gain even one mile per gallon (21mpg total) you pay $0.185 per mile.

The cost of the parts and tune you just have to figure into the performance gains, you can't do those for MPG alone....it's not cost-effective.
 
P

PSYKOSTEVO

Banned
Apr 11, 2008
194
0
0
May 19, 2008
#11
  • May 19, 2008
  • #11
1
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Persistent P0102 and limp mode
  • Godless
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
253
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Nov 11, 2025
Godless
G
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
G
Sputtering/misfiring below 2500rpm
  • Godless
  • Sep 14, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
416
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2025
gkomo
G
2006 Mustang GT o2 Sensor Wiring Issue Car Bogging/Choking
  • GCantero93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
Engine Sick of stock TB and EGR spacer...
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
702
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 19, 2024
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?