• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Throttle by wire?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BLOWN95GT
  • Start date Start date Jul 28, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
W

WrongWay

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
128
0
0
Under the Hood
Jul 30, 2004
#21
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #21
In my opinion technological advancement is a good thing. Throttle by wire has lead to better traction control systems, and engine management systems, which equals better performance. And also it takes the place of mechanical parts, which will eventually wear over time.
 

65conv50

New Member
Jan 8, 2003
290
0
0
Greenville, South Carolina
Jul 30, 2004
#22
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #22
jadesville said:
I think he was talking about in general, like adding new mufflers, a lift kit on your truck, new tires/wheels, etc.. Maybe I read it wrong..
Click to expand...

That's exactly what I was talking about. I believe it came up when a guy was stopped because he had his car "jacked up" above stock ride height. I remember it was in one of the hotrod mags I read.

Yes, I know emissions are Federally mandated... I was talking about other stuff.

I agree, it is stoopid. But legislaters are famous for legislating stoopid things.
 

65conv50

New Member
Jan 8, 2003
290
0
0
Greenville, South Carolina
Jul 30, 2004
#23
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #23
WrongWay said:
In my opinion technological advancement is a good thing. Throttle by wire has lead to better traction control systems, and engine management systems, which equals better performance. And also it takes the place of mechanical parts, which will eventually wear over time.
Click to expand...

Electronic stuff wears out over time, too. And it's not as reliable as mechanical connections. I'd just as soon stay with cable. There is a basic engineering principle that the more complex the system, the higher the failure rate. That is inescapable.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Jul 30, 2004
#24
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #24
Don't fear technology. Learn how to use it. It is inevitable that our cars are going to get more complex. If we fear technology. We might as well start restoring model t's
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Jul 30, 2004
#25
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #25
65conv50 said:
Electronic stuff wears out over time, too. And it's not as reliable as mechanical connections. I'd just as soon stay with cable. There is a basic engineering principle that the more complex the system, the higher the failure rate. That is inescapable.
Click to expand...

Say what?

Electronic devices are more reliable than mechanical devices. Any mechanical device is going to have some sort of wear occur when it is used.


Are you suggesting that we go back to mechanical brakes because hydraullic brakes are not reliable?

Or maybe a flat head 4 cyl with an single barrel updraft carburator fed by a gas tank mounted on the fire wall that uses gravity feed would be better, just like Ford used in the Model A.
 

NewPony'05

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
137
0
0
Connecticut (for now)
Jul 30, 2004
#26
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #26
its gonna be like windows. update all the date for better results. or maybe like video cards. i want to see them try to stop people from working on their cars. that will deff result in some unemployed legislators.
Click to expand...

 

spectravp

New Member
Apr 29, 2004
424
0
0
NY
Jul 30, 2004
#27
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #27
351CJ said:
Say what?

Electronic devices are more reliable than mechanical devices. Any mechanical device is going to have some sort of wear occur when it is used.


Are you suggesting that we go back to mechanical brakes because hydraullic brakes are not reliable?

Or maybe a flat head 4 cyl with an single barrel updraft carburator fed by a gas tank mounted on the fire wall that uses gravity feed would be better, just like Ford used in the Model A.
Click to expand...

Well put!

For the record, just in case there is any confusion as to wether or not the Mustang will be cable or wire; it is indeed a throttle by wire system. There will be no cable in Mustangs anymore.
 

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Jul 30, 2004
#28
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #28
Some articles say throttle by wire improves performance some say it hurts it. I hate to make any judgements before I actually drive the car.
 
W

WrongWay

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
128
0
0
Under the Hood
Jul 30, 2004
#29
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #29
Cable is faster than Drive by Wire. I really didnt want to hear this, I was hoping that they wernt going to do this
Click to expand...

I am sorry, but I must dispute this statement. An electrical connection will have a much greater transient response time and be far more accurate than a mechanical connection. This thread is filled with fallacy and misinformation, fellow stangers please do your research before you post and misinform those unsuspecting, and just out to seek valid information, and this is how rumors and myths get started. The benefits of a by-wire system far supersede those of a mechanical connection, as far as emissions, drivability, safety, fuel consumption, throttle response and smoothness are concerned. With the implementation of a by-wire system you are replacing a mechanical system that is smaller, safer and more efficient and by all accounts that is just good engineering. Aircraft and many other defense systems have long switched to by-wire systems because of these very benefits. I can’t wait to the automobile industry fully adopts this technology and starts to implement brake by-wire, steer by-wire and such systems.
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Jul 30, 2004
#30
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #30
I had the impression from driving vehicles equipped with that technology, that there was significant lag, but after re-reading about the technology yesterday, I was wrong.

I'm still not pleased with it though.
 
U

uglyII

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
89
0
0
Jul 31, 2004
#31
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #31
I can’t wait to the automobile industry fully adopts this technology and starts to implement brake by-wire, steer by-wire and such systems.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but you will never catch me driving a car with brake or steer by wire.
Just call it the:
"Crash my @#! into a brick wall when I blow a fuse and cant stop or steer"
system.

I am fairly certain neither one of these technologies is on the way. There is something reassuring when you know that if you have an electrical failure, you wont have to open the door and drag your feet on the ground.
 
W

WrongWay

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
128
0
0
Under the Hood
Jul 31, 2004
#32
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #32
uglyII said:
I am fairly certain neither one of these technologies is on the way.
Click to expand...


Hey don’t get angry at the world just because you rather change the channel on your TV using a rotary knob because using one of those remote things is some form of witchcraft. I beg to differ. Maybe not in the few years but differently within the foreseeable further will some form of these technologies be implemented into passenger automobiles.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Jul 31, 2004
#33
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #33
uglyII said:
Sorry, but you will never catch me driving a car with brake or steer by wire.
Just call it the:
"Crash my @#! into a brick wall when I blow a fuse and cant stop or steer"
system.

I am fairly certain neither one of these technologies is on the way. There is something reassuring when you know that if you have an electrical failure, you wont have to open the door and drag your feet on the ground.
Click to expand...

I believe there are actually a few cars out now that have brake by wire. And everyone knows perfectly well. That noone will be crashing into walls when they blow a fues. It's a little thing called product liability. If the system had that kind of potential problem. It would never be made.
 
U

uglyII

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
89
0
0
Jul 31, 2004
#34
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #34
Wow, didnt intend to come accross as angry or bitter. Instead, let me pose it
as a question:
What kind of backup system does a vehicle with brake by wire have to insure that if the primary system fails, you can still stop the vehicle?
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Jul 31, 2004
#35
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #35
uglyII said:
Wow, didnt intend to come accross as angry or bitter. Instead, let me pose it
as a question:
What kind of backup system does a vehicle with brake by wire have to insure that if the primary system fails, you can still stop the vehicle?
Click to expand...

I'm sure that there would have to be some sort of backup system and / or limp home mode. Remember that until the late 1960's hydraullic brake systems had no backup. If one brake line or cylinder started leaking, you could quickly loose ALL your brakes. I forget the first year but it wasn't until about 1967 that federal regulations mandated dual master brake cylinders so if you lost one of the lines or brakes you could still stop your vehicle.
 
6

63_Fairlane

Founding Member
Jan 22, 2001
215
0
16
Greenville, SC
Jul 31, 2004
#36
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #36
Ok, a few things about by wire systems... This is not a direct electrical connection between the gas petal and the throttle. The signal generated at the petal will be interpreted by the engine managment computer and then the throttle will open in accordance with some form of look up table or other computation.

The benefits are programable throttle response, incorporating cruise control hardware into the throttle assembly, improved gas mileage, and potential improved performance, the TPS sensor is essentialy attached directly to the gas petal, etc...

By wire throttle systems are in the Corvette, upper end Mercedes, BMWs, etc... Everyone is going to this system.

Like any other new technology, if it is properly implemented, we won't even know it's there unless we look for it.
 

nito88stang

Founding Member
May 23, 2002
2,012
0
46
Fullerton, California
Aug 1, 2004
#37
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #37
Greeeeeaaat........so how much are bigger throttle bodies gonna cost now? 300? 400? 500?
 

1Slick5.0

New Member
Jul 21, 2004
132
0
0
Vermont
Aug 1, 2004
#38
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #38
It was so much easier back in the day of simple design. Any joe schmo could work on his car. Now u need code scanners, tools that cost way too much on and on and on. Technology is a good thing. Just think one day many many many years down the road. The worlds oil supply is gonna be completely tapped. Gone done fineto. Then drive by wire throttles wont matter.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Aug 1, 2004
#39
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #39
1Slick5.0 said:
It was so much easier back in the day of simple design. Any joe schmo could work on his car. Now u need code scanners, tools that cost way too much on and on and on. Technology is a good thing. Just think one day many many many years down the road. The worlds oil supply is gonna be completely tapped. Gone done fineto. Then drive by wire throttles wont matter.
Click to expand...

Doesn't all the technology make it easier to work on your car. Since the code scanner will usually tell you what is wrong with you car. Rather than you having to spend time trying to figure out what is wrong. It's simply a code. Go fix it see if there are any other codes. More expensive? Yes, but I as I said. The code reading theoretically makes it easier.
 

1Slick5.0

New Member
Jul 21, 2004
132
0
0
Vermont
Aug 1, 2004
#40
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #40
I guess you could be right if you posses a code reader. But for the majority of people who dont own one. Then its the addeds stress of goin to the shop paying just to have it looked at then going from there. They do take the guess work outta it.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
909
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
M
1991 GT cigarette lighter/port not working (horn is working)
  • MartinM
  • Aug 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
231
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
MartinM
M
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
742
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?