• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Timing Covers & Water Pumps

  • Thread starter Thread starter 66P51GT
  • Start date Start date Sep 27, 2004

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Sep 27, 2004
#1
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #1
I have heard there that specific timing covers are necessary for specific water pumps. In particular...

Early Model: Cast Iron Water Pump
Early Model: Aluminum Water Pump
Late Model: Reverse Rotation

I have the original timing cover off of my '66 that I just bead blasted. I compared it today from the one off my '90 5.0. Everything appears identical in the water pump mounting location including the inlets in and out of the water pump, bolt patterns, and depth behind the water pump.

Years ago I replaced my early iron water pump with an aluminum one and didn't know of a difference between the timing covers and ran it for 120,000 worry free miles.

What gives? If somebody really knows the difference, please reply.

Thanks!
-Chuck
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Sep 27, 2004
#2
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #2
Well, I have a late model cover with an early model iron water pump, drivers side though. I was haveing trouble getting a drivers side aluminum that wasn't reverse rotation. I'm pretty sure if the holes line up it will work. i think the only diffrence is passenger side and drivers side pumps maybe
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Sep 27, 2004
#3
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #3
i am at this cross roads too. I have a late model block im getting ready to put in.....with vbelts.....electric pump....but dont know what cover to use
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Sep 27, 2004
#4
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #4
I'll take some pictures tonight and post. Front side and back side are identical with relationships to the waterpump passages, bolt holes, etc.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Sep 27, 2004
#5
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #5
The early aluminum pumps used a timing cover where the bottom of the pump mounting surface was smooth and straight.
The later versions, cast iron, were nearly identical except the bottom of the water pump mating surface was 'scalloped' inward toward the impeller.
So, theoretically they should not interchange, due to different gaskets/mounting surface, they just might. I have never tried to mix match.
Other than this, all the other differences are more superficial, like changes in dipstick locations, timing pointers, and oil fill tubes found on some earlier versions.
Also, some have no provision for a mechanical fuel pump and very early versions have a road draft tube for case venting.
Dave
 

351LX

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2001
1,007
0
0
Regina, Saskatchewan
Sep 27, 2004
#6
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #6
I had 3 covers in the garage side by side, one from a 1972 302,an 84 351w and an 88 302 H.O. and the only difference I could see was the location of the timing pointer, type of front seal,provision for a dipstick and on the 88 cover the fuel pump boss was there but was blocked off.
 

Attachments

  • 3covers_WEB.webp
    21.5 KB · Views: 165
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Sep 27, 2004
#7
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #7
351LX got it right. They WILL interchange, you can put an early water pump on a 5.0 cover.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Sep 27, 2004
#8
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #8
351LX said:
I had 3 covers in the garage side by side, one from a 1972 302,an 84 351w and an 88 302 H.O. and the only difference I could see was the location of the timing pointer, type of front seal,provision for a dipstick and on the 88 cover the fuel pump boss was there but was blocked off.
Click to expand...
Considering the SBF went from 62-98(?), you have some time frames not represented in your selection. The 20 years missing is more than half the engine's existence.
Your latest part still has a fuel pump boss, your earliest part was 7 years after they stopped using aluminum water pumps and oil fill tubes.
There are distinct differences not represented.
Dave
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Sep 28, 2004
#9
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #9
I attached 2 other examples.
I was looking for a pic of the version with 2, yes 2, fuel pump mounts... one on each side.
 

Attachments

  • Aluminum pump timing cover.webp
    9 KB · Views: 253
  • EFI timing cover.webp
    10.3 KB · Views: 235

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Sep 28, 2004
#10
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #10
Timing cover on left is from the '66
Timing cover on the right is from the '90
The '66 had an iron water pump.
The '90 had a reverse rotation pump.

The '66 has a mechanical fuel pump boss, hole for the dipstick.

In this case, it appears I can use an aluminum standard or reverse rotation pump.
Left '66 Right '90

 

Attachments

  • DSCN1302-01.webp
    19.5 KB · Views: 259
  • DSCN1303-01.webp
    22 KB · Views: 236

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Sep 28, 2004
#11
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #11
I'm starting to see the differences now based on the photos that ratio411 provided.

63-64 Aluminum pump timing cover:


94+EFI Timing Cover
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Sep 28, 2004
#12
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #12
The aluminum pump pic is around 63-64. A year sooner would have the road draft, a year later wouldn't have the fill tube mounted on the timing cover.
The late model cover was put into use around 94 till the end of 5.0 production.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Sep 28, 2004
#13
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #13
I added bold titles to the images above. All we seem to be missing is an example of an early Cast Iron water pump cover and we have ourselves a nice little identification chart.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Sep 28, 2004
#14
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #14
I find it amazing that you can look at the water pump section of the cover and see that it is very similar in design for the first and last 5 years of the SBF's 40. The 30 years in the middle were quite different.
It's like they came full circle with aluminum pumps.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
1997 3.8l v6 timing cover mismatch *eBay guaranteed fit* haha please HELP
  • chasondragons
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
97
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 3, 2026
chasondragons
C
Quick question about water pump / timing chain cover
  • D Durden
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
238
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 6, 2025
GOvert
G
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
780
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
D
Engine Water pump back plate bolts touching timing cover?
  • dqureshi06
  • Oct 27, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
990
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 29, 2024
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?