• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Tire question, stock 235/50 so between these others, what say you?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr_Q
  • Start date Start date Mar 24, 2008

Mr_Q

Founding Member
Nov 5, 2002
721
8
48
Burbank, CA
www.linkedin.com
Mar 24, 2008
#1
  • Mar 24, 2008
  • #1
I am using the stock rim so I can't go too crazy but I would be mounting the tires for race day only. So I am not too concerned with "looks". They'll come off after the race.

My size choices for a usable range are: (tire is the Potenza RE01)

255/35
245/45
245/40

Which would be best, this is for all you auto-x and road course guys/gals. I am leaning towards more rubber on the ground so the 255/35.
 

Redfire 05

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
236
0
0
Lubbock, TX
Mar 24, 2008
#2
  • Mar 24, 2008
  • #2
Do you have a tuner? Because you will need to adjust your speedo for any of those tire sizes. They are all shorter than stock. And be sure you consider ride height as well. The 255/35 17 would lower your car a little over 1.5 inches. If you are using lowering springs as well you could be pretty close to the ground. I think that is why most people are going with 18's or bigger. You can have low profile tires without loosing a lot of ride height. So ideally you should go with 18's.

Having said that the 245/45's will drop you only 3/4 inch lower and I was looking at 255/45 17's which would drop you a little over a half an inch and they are a little wider. They might be better choices if your ride height is already low.
 

Mr_Q

Founding Member
Nov 5, 2002
721
8
48
Burbank, CA
www.linkedin.com
Mar 25, 2008
#3
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #3
Yeah I considered that. A lower center of gravity at the track is a good thing. The Shelby GT already has the complete Ford Racing suspension kit on it and is thus lowered as is. Also the car has 18s on it right now too, again stock.

Since these tires would be mounted *only* for track day I am not too worried about it. it will actually help. And as for the speedo I am not concerned with "watching" my speed at the track, heh.
 

Mr_Q

Founding Member
Nov 5, 2002
721
8
48
Burbank, CA
www.linkedin.com
Mar 25, 2008
#4
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #4
I know everyone is waiting in anticipation so I will post my final choice.

Bridgestone RE-01s in 245-45-18 (140tw)

This will give me .4" more overall width, only .3" lower profile and only a .6" overall drop in the car. Perfect.

And the speedo offset is: 65mph is really 63.4mph. So cop safe for me.

$952 shipped from Tirerack unless I can find better.
 

CBus 06 GT

Active Member
Aug 29, 2006
0
9
29
Columbus, Ohio
Mar 25, 2008
#5
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #5
Mr_Q said:
I know everyone is waiting in anticipation so I will post my final choice.

Bridgestone RE-01s in 245-45-18 (140tw)

This will give me .4" more overall width, only .3" lower profile and only a .6" overall drop in the car. Perfect.

And the speedo offset is: 65mph is really 63.4mph. So cop safe for me.

$952 shipped from Tirerack unless I can find better.
Click to expand...

Umm, wouldn't a .3" lower profile result in a .3" drop
 

Mr_Q

Founding Member
Nov 5, 2002
721
8
48
Burbank, CA
www.linkedin.com
Mar 25, 2008
#6
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #6
CBus 06 GT said:
Umm, wouldn't a .3" lower profile result in a .3" drop
Click to expand...

http://www.discounttire.com/dtcs/infoTireMath.dos
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
51
Long Island NY
www.spartaperformance.com
Mar 25, 2008
#7
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #7
Getting a lower profile tire isn't going to lower the center of gravity, it's going to lower the car. The center of gravity gets lower by control arm pitch and SAI angles.
 

CBus 06 GT

Active Member
Aug 29, 2006
0
9
29
Columbus, Ohio
Mar 25, 2008
#8
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #8
Mr_Q said:
http://www.discounttire.com/dtcs/infoTireMath.dos
Click to expand...

Well, your ride height is affected by the radius of the tire, not the diameter. The center line of the axle to the ground only crosses the sidewall once, thereby dropping your ride height by .3, not .6.
 

Mr_Q

Founding Member
Nov 5, 2002
721
8
48
Burbank, CA
www.linkedin.com
Mar 25, 2008
#9
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #9
So their tire calc is wrong you are saying? That's where I got the numbers.
 

CBus 06 GT

Active Member
Aug 29, 2006
0
9
29
Columbus, Ohio
Mar 25, 2008
#10
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #10
tommyroc said:
Getting a lower profile tire isn't going to lower the center of gravity, it's going to lower the car. The center of gravity gets lower by control arm pitch and SAI angles.
Click to expand...

The center of gravity would drop with a lower profile tire (.3" in this case). I think what you are talking about is roll center. Don't really know what it is except that suspension components affect it (thinking back to the days of following sprint cars and how different length radius rods and mounting points of those rods changed the roll center which changed how the car handled).
 

CBus 06 GT

Active Member
Aug 29, 2006
0
9
29
Columbus, Ohio
Mar 25, 2008
#11
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #11
Mr_Q said:
So their tire calc is wrong you are saying? That's where I got the numbers.
Click to expand...

Not saying their numbers are wrong, I'm saying your application of the numbers is wrong. If the sidewall height is dropped .3", that's how much the ride height will drop. The diameter will drop .6", but half of that (the top sidewall) only shows up as a .3" larger gap to the fender.
 
S

Snooze

New Member
Jan 16, 2008
43
0
0
Mar 26, 2008
#12
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #12
tracking your car. i would keep your 255/35 all around. or 255 rear, 245(or235)/35 front.

1) lower profile, and tighter fitting tire WILL improve handling and feel of the car around a corner. less slopp in the side-wall's. big bonus.

2) wider foot-print in the rear will give you better turn-out potential, and more grip after a hairpin.

3) skinny tire's will carve a corner much better. tire scrub is less of an issue, which gives you potential for more lateral G's.

if you go to the track with custom alignment (i'm not sure what mustangs run for toe to eliminate scrub) but my subaru runs +0.23degree's total on the front toe, and it definatly feel's tighter when taking a corner..
 

Redfire 05

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
236
0
0
Lubbock, TX
Mar 26, 2008
#13
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #13
But mustangs come from the factory with understeer. Wouldn't narrower tires in the front and wider tires in the rear make the understeer worse? Unless you have corrected the understeer issue.

I mean yes, the narrower fronts would turn better at low speeds, but they would loose grip more quickly than the rears right? Unless you have a big horsepower car you really shouldn't need the bigger rear tires. With non-supercharged horsepower levels you should be able to easily control the power on oversteer by slowly applying throttle.
 

Mr_Q

Founding Member
Nov 5, 2002
721
8
48
Burbank, CA
www.linkedin.com
Mar 26, 2008
#14
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #14
With the front heaviness of our cars I am wanting to keep the tire widths the same all around. Skinnier up front is only going to promote understeer. And as long as I behave, power oversteer I can wrangle far better.
 
S

Snooze

New Member
Jan 16, 2008
43
0
0
Mar 26, 2008
#15
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #15
with the traction that the re-01 will supply, i honestly doubt you'll have understeer issues more prominant than running a wider tire.

personal choice i suppose. I'm spoiled with my subaru when i'm on the track, the stang just feels like a dead-weight, while the subi is running 225/35 tires.
 

Mr_Q

Founding Member
Nov 5, 2002
721
8
48
Burbank, CA
www.linkedin.com
Mar 26, 2008
#16
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #16
From my time in the Subi I found it boring honestly. I mean once you mastered it's limits, the damn car practically drives itself!

I love tossing the big V8s around the track, too much fun! Like bull riding!
 
S

s1roush

New Member
Mar 14, 2007
22
0
0
Mar 27, 2008
#17
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #17
Let us know how you like those tires.

This is my next set: Nitto Invo 275/40ZR-18
 
S

Snooze

New Member
Jan 16, 2008
43
0
0
Mar 27, 2008
#18
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #18
Mr_Q said:
From my time in the Subi I found it boring honestly. I mean once you mastered it's limits, the damn car practically drives itself!

I love tossing the big V8s around the track, too much fun! Like bull riding!
Click to expand...

Definatly true. some friends of mine that own other construction business i work with, when we go to the track its always hard competition for fast driving.

i've taken my mustang to have fun before, but when i try to pit it against a friends 05 porsche gt3. or another's fox body with 550hp and a xxx/65 tire. almost pointless!
it can't keep up to a gt3 in a corner (and its very hard pressed to meet it on a straight away without him making an error) and the fox when it hits a straight, makes up for any loss!

the gt3 owner also has a Cascar (cdn nascar) and holy ****.. 400hp, and maybe 1850lbs give or take 500. some of his employee's drive that car when its not broken down. and even for novice/amateur drivers, that car insanly fast.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Wheels-Tires Tire sizes. 18x9 front and rear
  • Mustang5L5
  • Jul 28, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 3, 2023
Mustang5L5
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
606
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Fuel Fuel Pump Rewire, New Fuel Lines, and Installation of New Fuel Pump Hanger with AN6 Connections
  • AeroCoupe
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
13K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 16, 2023
AeroCoupe
S
What tires are good for a base model ‘07 v6?
  • SJF92
  • May 19, 2020
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
7K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 21, 2020
cbxer55
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?