• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

TKO or G-Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88stangmangt
  • Start date Start date Dec 14, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Dec 14, 2003
#1
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #1
i am looking at buying/builidng a new tranny (part of my winter upgrade package)i want a good strong tranny that i wont have to upgrade in a few years once i am done building my gt. i need a good strong tranny that can take abuse and also do great on the highway/street/track g-force seems to be the popular choice and it is lighter than a tko so what do you guys think i should go with? (to be used with a spec stage 2 clutch) also for the g-force do i have to re-place anything i.e bell houseing? can i run a frpp alum drive shaft?

THANKS GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

TrophyHead

15 Year Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,195
11
49
PA
Dec 14, 2003
#2
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #2
Everything will bolt right up to the G-force. You can send your tranny to G-force and the'll build it up. Or you can get the rebuild kit and do it youself.

My vote is the G-force.
 

HO93LX302

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2002
715
0
0
Naugatuck,CT
Dec 14, 2003
#3
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #3
I would go with G-force... thats my choice, i'll be doing the same unless i plan on throwing in a powerglide
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 14, 2003
#4
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #4
My vote is the Tremec, the case on a Tremec is much, much beefier and will take more abuse then the stock case that the G-Force uses and is prone to flex and breakage. I broke a stock case with under 300HP.

The GM spline that the TKO comes with is much stronger as well, and it comes with the yoke for the driveshaft.

The TKO or TKO II will take what ever you throw at it and should hold up to what you do in the future.

I've got a glide, but it is far from a street car anymore
 

hoss331stang

New Member
Jan 17, 2003
453
0
0
Williamston SC
Dec 14, 2003
#5
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #5
Rick91GT is right, but you have to remember that with a TKO you need a new clutch, shifter, bellhousing...etc...the ones off of the T-5 won't work......Its cheaper/easier, the G-force way, unless you car is a full drag car, then i'd put a 2 spd Auto in that bad boy...
 
B

blk306

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
213
0
0
MD
Dec 14, 2003
#6
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #6
I'm going with G-Force, in my 94, when I rebuild.
 
M

mikeoforchard

Founding Member
Mar 31, 2002
301
0
0
Annapolis, MD
Dec 14, 2003
#7
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #7
The G-force needs a 26spline clutch, not sure about the tko's.
The G-forces are much lighter. I have one but no time on it yet I will report back as soon as I give it hell.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 14, 2003
#8
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #8
mikeoforchard said:
The G-force needs a 26spline clutch, not sure about the tko's.
The G-forces are much lighter. I have one but no time on it yet I will report back as soon as I give it hell.
Click to expand...

Mike depending what model of the G-Force you get, the imput may be stock spline, the better more expensive model has the 26 spline like you have It will be nice to finally see some real world testing on one, lot's of hear say and rumors but no real hard numbers and durabilty is known.
 
Q

QBstang87

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
547
0
0
Montgomery Village, Maryland
Dec 14, 2003
#9
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #9
someone on corral is running one but it's in a track car. he has the straight cut g force. says no way in hell he'd drive it on the street daily, but its awesome for the track.
 
3

3spd on floor

Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
1,099
0
0
Acworth, GA
Dec 14, 2003
#10
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #10
go with the G-force. be the guinea pig and tell us what you think of it.
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Dec 14, 2003
#11
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #11
i was in the same boat a few months ago and went with the TKO. It has been proven time and time again and is very underated by tremec. If you plan on putting down alot of power, you should be shopping for a scattershield anyways, not using an aluminum bellhousing. Thats just my opinion though. Im one of many that feel my feet are worth at least 300 bucks or so
 

Xtreme Limits

Founding Member
Nov 30, 2001
375
0
16
Hudson, Florida
Dec 14, 2003
#12
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #12
G-force..
 

what_stanger?

I am the mailman!!
Founding Member
Feb 7, 2002
1,697
0
36
Northern Illinois
Dec 15, 2003
#13
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #13
that Gforce 'straight cut' geared trans looks like it would be awesome to drive, but they outlaw it in NMRA, must be helical (sp?) cut gears
 
R

rockin_rick

Member
Oct 9, 2003
968
1
17
Dec 15, 2003
#14
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #14
The rotational mass of the (stock) T-5 is also less than that of the TKO. I've heard that it's good for about 1.5 tenths in the quarter mile. That means that the rotational mass of the T-5 is about 15 pounds less than the TKO's, if the 'rule of thumb' that a 10 pound reduction equals one tenth, holds up. I'm not sure how much more the G-force gearset weighs, but if it's less than the TKO, there is a performance benefit with the G-force. Something else to factor in to the decision.

I'm not trying to hijack your post, but I've heard that Liberty's Gears also makes a replacement gearset for the T-5. Does anyone know how much torque it can handle? I think that it's a lot less $$ than the G-force. Perhaps it can handle your amount of power, and save you some cash.

www.libertysgears.com


Rick
 

T_5.0_N'works

New Member
Sep 30, 2003
260
0
0
Texas
Dec 15, 2003
#15
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #15
rockin_rick said:
The rotational mass of the (stock) T-5 is also less than that of the TKO. I've heard that it's good for about 1.5 tenths in the quarter mile. That means that the rotational mass of the T-5 is about 15 pounds less than the TKO's, if the 'rule of thumb' that a 10 pound reduction equals one tenth, holds up. I'm not sure how much more the G-force gearset weighs, but if it's less than the TKO, there is a performance benefit with the G-force. Something else to factor in to the decision.

I'm not trying to hijack your post, but I've heard that Liberty's Gears also makes a replacement gearset for the T-5. Does anyone know how much torque it can handle? I think that it's a lot less $$ than the G-force. Perhaps it can handle your amount of power, and save you some cash.

www.libertysgears.com


Rick
Click to expand...

I think the rule of thumb is for every 100lbs you take off you get a .1 in the 1/4.
 

what_stanger?

I am the mailman!!
Founding Member
Feb 7, 2002
1,697
0
36
Northern Illinois
Dec 15, 2003
#16
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #16
T_5.0_N'works said:
I think the rule of thumb is for every 100lbs you take off you get a .1 in the 1/4.
Click to expand...

he was talking about rotational mass....not gross vehicle weight, which is what you're thinking i'm pretty sure
 

T_5.0_N'works

New Member
Sep 30, 2003
260
0
0
Texas
Dec 15, 2003
#17
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #17
what_stanger? said:
he was talking about rotational mass....not gross vehicle weight, which is what you're thinking i'm pretty sure
Click to expand...

 

mr.nitrous

New Member
Dec 13, 2003
54
0
0
Southern California
Dec 15, 2003
#18
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #18
Viper Blueprinted T-56
 
M

mikeoforchard

Founding Member
Mar 31, 2002
301
0
0
Annapolis, MD
Dec 15, 2003
#19
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #19
The G-Force is much lighter then the TKO I think it only weighs like 15lbs more then the stock T5. I was not aware that G-force had different input shafts...
On a side note let me say a little bit about G-Force.
Those guys really are great. Bubba stayed really late on a friday night to get my tranny done for me. I basically drove up there and gave him my T-5 and he gave me the G-force. I bought a used gear set which had only a little time on them and basically no wear. Everything else was new. It cost me right around $1150, (if I'm aloud to say this) which to my knownledge is a lot less then the other trannys out there, however it is semi used. I would definitly reccommend these guys on my initial impression. After I get my car moving and making some power I will let you know how everything goes, however with the power i'm mkain (290rwhp) I don't think the tranny is going to go south on me...
mike
 

TT91

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,536
0
36
Paramus, NJ
Dec 15, 2003
#20
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #20
Where is G-force located?? I may have to swing by sometime..
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
613
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
506
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
HP woes with Sniper Sytem
  • Stang_1973
  • Mar 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
806
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 13, 2025
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?