• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

To GT350 or not...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boss 351
  • Start date Start date May 20, 2006
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
May 20, 2006
#1
  • May 20, 2006
  • #1
I'm wondering about some 1966 style graphics on the notchback. I photochopped the car by lowering the suspension and added the graphics. I would only put the stripes on the hood and trunk (roof is overkill imo) and the stripes over the rocker panels but I'd put the MUSTANG wording in the center stripe near the front fender.

stock, lowered:


stripes


I'm torn between it being a very clean and simple coupe and it being too white. I will leave the pony wheels on there and I won't be adding any type of wing or body kit. The only body mods I'm planning are; better tinting, antenna delete, and I guess that's it...
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
May 20, 2006
#2
  • May 20, 2006
  • #2
My opinion, the stripes dont look that bad... Id think about doing them.

If I were to lower it though I would never lower the back that much. Personally the nose looks good and the stripes actually look good (coming from someone who doesnt like them much) but you would have to lower it much less out back!
 

ALMOSTFINISHED

Member
Jan 8, 2004
315
0
17
Westchester County NY
May 20, 2006
#3
  • May 20, 2006
  • #3
I say . I knew a guy with the same car as you except he had the regular finish ponies on his instead of the white. Had nearly the exact same stripes too. I thought, (along with everyone else who saw the car) it looked badass. I say go for it.

Nick
 

90blacknight

Member
Apr 11, 2006
136
0
18
May 20, 2006
#4
  • May 20, 2006
  • #4
I personally don't like stripes on the fox. I think the car looks good the way it is. The car looks clean, I wouldn't mess with stripes.
 

Hickfied

Member
Nov 9, 2005
413
0
16
Morganton, NC
May 20, 2006
#5
  • May 20, 2006
  • #5
That would look excellent! Expecially with a lighter blue, and no lowering at all
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
May 20, 2006
#6
  • May 20, 2006
  • #6
Boss 351 said:
I'm wondering about some 1966 style graphics on the notchback. I photochopped the car by lowering the suspension and added the graphics. I would only put the stripes on the hood and trunk (roof is overkill imo) and the stripes over the rocker panels but I'd put the MUSTANG wording in the center stripe near the front fender.

stock, lowered:


stripes


I'm torn between it being a very clean and simple coupe and it being too white. I will leave the pony wheels on there and I won't be adding any type of wing or body kit. The only body mods I'm planning are; better tinting, antenna delete, and I guess that's it...
Click to expand...

a guy near me has that. im not too fond of it at all, but to each their own.
 

RWDtech

Member
Feb 28, 2006
119
4
19
central Indiana
May 22, 2006
#7
  • May 22, 2006
  • #7
dude those stripes look sweet on a notchback!
 

sunil6784

Member
Mar 31, 2005
620
0
18
Boston, MA
May 22, 2006
#8
  • May 22, 2006
  • #8
Meh, i dont really like stripes on a notch, and rarely on a hatch. I think your car looks great jsut the way it is.
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
May 24, 2006
#9
  • May 24, 2006
  • #9
Thanks guys... I'm still torn between the two... I may just do the sides "laser stripes" with the MUSTANG font in the middle stripe near the front fender.

I could try vinyl to start with but I would paint them using a blue base with some sort of pearl... The car is going to get repainted next winter anyway (stock white), might as well mess with the factory paint since it won't really matter in the end lol
 

woodyy24

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
290
0
0
illinois
May 24, 2006
#10
  • May 24, 2006
  • #10
i like it
 

Kabuki_notch

Founding Member
Nov 19, 2001
670
394
113
Rochester, NY
May 24, 2006
#11
  • May 24, 2006
  • #11
honest opinion, id say no, stripes look ugly imo but again like people say it's your car do whatever pleases you. nice notch btw
 

5.0 con-vert

No soup for you, Joe Rogan!!!
Jun 7, 2005
244
4
39
Boca Raton, FL
May 24, 2006
#12
  • May 24, 2006
  • #12
looks good. Do it...do it!
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
May 24, 2006
#13
  • May 24, 2006
  • #13
no
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
691
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
821
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
5
What's it Worth? 1990 Notchback 5.0
  • 50notch90
  • Apr 14, 2024
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
4
Views
2K
What is it Worth?!?!? Apr 23, 2024
50notch90
5
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?