• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

TO MASS AIR CONVERSION, OR NOT TO MASS AIR CONVERSION????

  • Thread starter Thread starter ~-Ws50's916-~
  • Start date Start date Aug 7, 2006
W

~-Ws50's916-~

New Member
Aug 5, 2006
27
0
0
I Live in West Sacramento, Soon to be Citrus Heigh
Aug 7, 2006
#1
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #1
OK...I KNOW I HAVE POSTED THIS BEFORE..BUT I KEEP GETTNIG DIFF. OPINIONS. AND IM JUST CONFUSED. SO THIS IS THE LAST ONE..

WELL, AS YOU CAN SEE MY SPECS ON THE BOTTOM, I WANNA PUT ON MY TRICK FLOW, MY 70MM TB/ 70MM EGR PLATE. SOME PEOPLE SAY IF I DONT GET MASS AIR, IT WILL IDLE FUNNY, OR IT WONT RUN RIGHT. WILL IT BE OK IF I PUT ON MY TF NOW, AND JUST MASS AIRED IT LATER? WILL I GET MORE HORSES AND HAVE IT RUNNNING MORE EFFECIENT IF I MASS AIR IT? LIKE I SAID BEFORE GUYS, SORRY FOR THE POSTS OF THE SAME SUBJ. LAST TIME K THNX
 
W

~-Ws50's916-~

New Member
Aug 5, 2006
27
0
0
I Live in West Sacramento, Soon to be Citrus Heigh
Aug 7, 2006
#2
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #2
1987 MUSTANG 5.0
MAC HEADERS
MAC COLD AIR INTAKE
SOON- UPPER TRICK FLOW INTAKE
SOON- LOWER TRICK FLOW INTAKE
OFF ROAD H PIPES (TWO CAT SHELLS WELDED ON)
KING COBRA CLUTH
WORLD CLASS T-5 TRANNY
SHORT THRO
SUB FRAME CONNECTORS
SWAY BARS ON REAR END
KONI FULLY ADJUSTABLE SHOCKS
LOWERING SPRINGS
FORD RACING PLUG WIRES
SOON TO BE MASS AIRED!
SOON- 70MM BBK EGR PLATE
SOON- 70MM THROTTLE BODY
 

88gt

Founding Member
Aug 2, 1999
794
0
0
Drillers cabin
Aug 7, 2006
#3
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #3
I've read that you can change intakes/throttle bodies without too much issue. If you have idle problems, Ford has an idle adjuster plate you can add for less than $20 and solve your idle issues.


p.s.......CAPS LOCK is your friend....
 
W

~-Ws50's916-~

New Member
Aug 5, 2006
27
0
0
I Live in West Sacramento, Soon to be Citrus Heigh
Aug 7, 2006
#4
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #4
ALRIGHT. SO I DONT NEED THE MASS AIR. IF I DO GET THE MASS AIR, WILL IT HAVE MUCH OF A HP/TORQUE DIFF.?
 

1987stangman

Member
Jul 12, 2006
684
24
19
Aug 7, 2006
#5
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #5
You really should have no problem with using SD system installing your intake or any other mod you listed. You should only worry when you start getting agressive on the cam. I have not yet converted to MA and really dont plan too untill later when the need comes for a new motor.
 
W

~-Ws50's916-~

New Member
Aug 5, 2006
27
0
0
I Live in West Sacramento, Soon to be Citrus Heigh
Aug 7, 2006
#6
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #6
ALRIGHT, I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND THAT I DONT NEED THE MASS AIR. BUT IF I HAD THE MASS AIR WITH IT, WOULD IT ADD ANY HP/TORQUE? THNX
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Aug 7, 2006
#7
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #7
No as stated before no...there is no performance advantage to mass air...I stated that before.
 

FoxRod87

Active Member
Feb 1, 2006
243
1
27
Carolina
Aug 7, 2006
#8
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #8
you probably would gain a little hp but not enough to feel.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Aug 7, 2006
#9
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #9
No if anything you'll have alittle more power with speed density, although it wont be enough to feel a difference. You can pretty much do any intake an exhaust mods with SD and be fine, with heads it will run good but the idle will start to suffer, mine idles fine untill I turn on the A/C, then the idle starts to surge pretty bad. With an aftermarket cam, as long as you get one that is speed density safe, or creates quite a bit of vacuum at idle it should be fine.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Aug 7, 2006
#10
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #10
FoxRod87 said:
you probably would gain a little hp but not enough to feel.
Click to expand...
This statement is just wrong.
 
M

mustang6788

New Member
Jan 5, 2006
27
0
0
Aug 8, 2006
#11
  • Aug 8, 2006
  • #11
I went quicker with a bone stock engine and 3:55 gears with SD compared to after I converted to a MAF. Depending on where you plan to go with your engine mods should be the deciding factor to conert your car over. I knew I was going to add a blower and cam is the reason I converted. Your car will be no quicker, although my car did idle slightly better after the conversion.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Aug 8, 2006
#12
  • Aug 8, 2006
  • #12
mass air flow is a good idea if you are going to go to an agressive cam.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

How to convert Speed Density to Mass air - Complete walk thru!
  • TTSaleen
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
157
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
TTSaleen
1987 Mustang GT Mass Air Conversion Help
  • mustangmike6996
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 4, 2025
mustangmike6996
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
574
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Sick of stock TB and EGR spacer...
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
684
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 19, 2024
General karthief
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?