• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Too Wide Rear End - what does it mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Takt
  • Start date Start date Apr 23, 2005

Takt

Member
Jul 14, 2004
48
0
6
Madison, WI
Apr 23, 2005
#1
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #1
I've searched this site, and now know that my 66 mustang needs a rearend that is 57 1/4 wide (flange to flange). I have an opportunity to get a rearend that is 58 1/2 at a great price (free. So, my question is, what does it mean to have the 5/8" too wide on each side? Is it a look thing, is it a tire clearance issue? Other issues?

I appreciate the help! I know its tough and frustrating for you experienced guys to always answer rearend questions, so I tried to search before posting! With no luck.

Thanks

tim
 
U

unluckyengineer

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
45
0
0
Apr 23, 2005
#2
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #2
not too sure about it but that sounds like it should just be different backspacing on the wheels. I am not totally sure on that though so don't quote me.
 

stangman16

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
640
4
29
San Antonio, TX
Apr 23, 2005
#3
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #3
backspacing might work for you in that situation. I have a '67 or so 'stang rear end in my '66 coupe, (measures 54 1/4" when the '66 is 52 1/4") and my tires scrape so badly, it's not even funny. I would've gone with different backspacing, but my rear end sticks out about 1/4" to the pass side more, so that tire gets cut worse. ahh, the symptoms of a previous dumb*$$ owner... gotta love all the mis-matched parts......
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Apr 23, 2005
#4
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #4
this means you could upgrade to new 95+ mustang rims and not have to use a spacer in the back!

i put a 67 rearend in my cousins 66 so he could do the same thing, and run the newer rims.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Apr 23, 2005
#5
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #5
Taxt, you are way off on your width. 65-66 require a 52 1/4" rear. If you buy the one measuring 58 1/2", it will be 6 1/4" too wide!!!! Your wheels will be sticking way out and your car will have to be jacked way up to keep from cutting the tires. You won't find wheels with enough backspacing to make it work.
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Apr 23, 2005
#6
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #6
i think he measured to outside drum to drum and not inner flange to flange.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Apr 23, 2005
#7
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #7
Oh, well shame on him then. May thr fleas of 1,000 camels infest his armpits. J/K Takt.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Apr 23, 2005
#8
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #8
mustangdave said:
Taxt, you are way off on your width. 65-66 require a 52 1/4" rear. If you buy the one measuring 58 1/2", it will be 6 1/4" too wide!!!! Your wheels will be sticking way out and your car will have to be jacked way up to keep from cutting the tires. You won't find wheels with enough backspacing to make it work.
Click to expand...
The 65-66 housing itself measures 52-1/4". The axle to axle flange measurement is 56-1/4". The 67-70 rears are 2" overall wider than the 65-66's, so add 2" to each of the above measurements.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Apr 23, 2005
#9
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #9
Here is a '65 with a '70 rear end set up. Not that big of a deal.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com

 

Takt

Member
Jul 14, 2004
48
0
6
Madison, WI
Apr 23, 2005
#10
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #10
mustangdave said:
Taxt, you are way off on your width. 65-66 require a 52 1/4" rear. If you buy the one measuring 58 1/2", it will be 6 1/4" too wide!!!! Your wheels will be sticking way out and your car will have to be jacked way up to keep from cutting the tires. You won't find wheels with enough backspacing to make it work.
Click to expand...


Yep, sorry, I've been reading about flange to flange, then you can add approx. 5" to get measurement x.... Anyway, I confused myself -- and it isn't hard to do at times

I also better get a better measurement about the new rear-end. I've visited kevinstang.com to read up about the measurements, then went to http://www.ridgenet.net/~biesiade/Fordrears.html
and found a matrix. I obviously need to make sure there isn't a 6" difference in the rearends. Thanks all for the help!

As for camel fleas, man I got enough problems....

tim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
943
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2026
DTCRAWLEY
D
Rear ends? And I don't mean the pretty kind.
  • WORTH
  • Jun 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
877
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 14, 2025
limp
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
406
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
120
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?