took the Bullitt to the track

mrpositraction · Oct 20, 2004

There is no real argument here, it is all opinion. This car is better, than this one. It's wasn't the car, it was the driver. Let me tell you guys something, don't try to argue with stupid people, they will just bring you down to there level and then beat you with experience. I am sure I will catch a ***** load of slack for this one.

codyGT · Oct 20, 2004

Well maybe if eveyone wouldn't operate on BS it would help. You can say all you want but seriously they are the same as a GT in the performance department.

FST BLK Pony · Oct 20, 2004

codyGT said:
Well maybe if eveyone wouldn't operate on BS it would help. You can say all you want but seriously they are the same as a GT in the performance department.

intake, cat-back, and a different tune are worth nothing?

oh and isn't handling performance also? are you going to say a bullitt doesn't handle any better than a GT also?

there's a few people in this thread that have actually owned both a 99+ GT and Bullitt...and they're the only ones that will really ever know how much of a difference there is.

4.6 Rocket · Oct 20, 2004

FST BLK Pony said:
there's a few people in this thread that have actually owned both a 99+ GT and Bullitt...and they're the only ones that will really ever know how much of a difference there is.

That is so true. I dont see why people with GT's get all upset. I mean seriously guys, take a standard GT add an intake plenum and TB, upgrade the springs, shocks, sway bars, brakes, and you pretty much have bullitt performance. Without that, they are not at the same performance level, they are close, but the Bullitt is better equiped stock. Thats why you pay more. GT's are bad ass cars as well, I had never planned on getting a Bullitt but after my 00GT was wrecked it was a good option. Overall, between the two cars, you can feel a difference driving them.

damien2003gt · Oct 20, 2004

God I hate it when people correct there time. To me it's b.s.. My car ran .003 short of a 13.5 almost stock and I don't care what it corrects to. Oh and humidity was over 85% that day.

4.6 Rocket · Oct 20, 2004

damien2003gt said:
God I hate it when people correct there time. To me it's b.s.. My car ran .003 short of a 13.5 almost stock and I don't care what it corrects to. Oh and humidity was over 85% that day.

Thats a strong GT you got there. Keep up the good work.

Jackie Chan · Oct 20, 2004

a bullitt is an awesome package for the money:

c/b
no spoiler
intake
susp
seats
guages
shift knob( )

Jackie Chan · Oct 20, 2004

damien2003gt said:
God I hate it when people correct there time. To me it's b.s.. My car ran .003 short of a 13.5 almost stock and I don't care what it corrects to. Oh and humidity was over 85% that day.

stupid people correcting their times what is that good for, knowing what improvements the cars actually making by taking the weather variable out of it pffffft! stupid. Dumb ass bracket racers use it too to run within .01 of their dial in pfffft

codyGT · Oct 20, 2004

Correcting times =

I never said Bullitt's weren't nice cars and when I was speaking performance I meant acceleration.

I know that when my car was bone stock I could tell a difference vs a stock Bullitt. But only on the really high end.

JonJon · Oct 20, 2004

.....
ridiculous.

Matto · Oct 20, 2004

It's funny how some of you Bullit guys act like your comparing an 03 cobra to a GT. I imagine they run pretty damn close times, Ford rated the GT at 260, the Bullit at 265, correct?

Jackie Chan · Oct 20, 2004

codyGT said:
Correcting times =

I never said Bullitt's weren't nice cars and when I was speaking performance I meant acceleration.

I know that when my car was bone stock I could tell a difference vs a stock Bullitt. But only on the really high end.

so you are saying correcting times are stupid? Like I sarcastically put it, it lets you compare how your car runs before and after mods by taking the weather variable out of the equation. IF YOU CANT COMPREHEND THIS YOU ARE A DUMB ASS!!

Jackie Chan · Oct 20, 2004

Matto said:
It's funny how some of you Bullit guys act like your comparing an 03 cobra to a GT. I imagine they run pretty damn close times, Ford rated the GT at 260, the Bullit at 265, correct?

no one is coming off like that, plus what are fords ratings good for??? 390 for a cobra and 305 for a mach. A bullitt puts down a healthy 10rwhp more stock and has a better power curve. For the money it was an awesome deal. Now they are bringing stupid money iMO

codyGT · Oct 20, 2004

No, I was just saying that what your car runs is what it runs. I live in Nebraska if I run a 13.9 then thats how fast my car is. It doesn't matter what it equals in other elevations. Even on a dyno, what are you really correcting? Like conditions will ever be 100% perfect anyway.

JonJon · Oct 21, 2004

codyGT said:
No, I was just saying that what your car runs is what it runs. I live in Nebraska if I run a 13.9 then thats how fast my car is. It doesn't matter what it equals in other elevations. Even on a dyno, what are you really correcting? Like conditions will ever be 100% perfect anyway.

.... are you kidding me
running at 5000 FT is going to make an 03 Cobra run 14's

are you telling me that means 03 cobras are 14s cars? and GTs at 5000 feet are 16s cars? (esimated times)

FST BLK Pony · Oct 21, 2004

codyGT said:
No, I was just saying that what your car runs is what it runs. I live in Nebraska if I run a 13.9 then thats how fast my car is. It doesn't matter what it equals in other elevations. Even on a dyno, what are you really correcting? Like conditions will ever be 100% perfect anyway.

well lets see, in the summer we have 3000' DA's most days...In january most days are 0-500' DA....

when will my car run faster?

that has to be one of the dumbest comments I've read in a while

damien2003gt · Oct 21, 2004

Hmm? i wonder if I could correct my "looks", to see how I would look had my parents been better looking.

FST BLK Pony · Oct 21, 2004

damien2003gt said:
Hmm? i wonder if I could correct my "looks", to see how I would look had my parents been better looking.

wtf? you're an idiot, please leave this thread asap

JonJon · Oct 21, 2004

damien2003gt said:
Hmm? i wonder if I could correct my "looks", to see how I would look had my parents been better looking.

yes, that helps comparing car to car or run to run

codyGT · Oct 21, 2004

All I am saying is that if your Cobra runs 14's at 5000 feet then that means LS1's run 14's at 5000 feet also. All things are equal. And what you can't measure gain off those numbers anyway?

So basically you make all things 100% then use that number when bench racing?

It's just really stupid when people post " I ran a 13.89 corrected thats 13.78 "
not to mention some people post corrected numbers and compare them to bare numbers to make them look better.

took the Bullitt to the track

mrpositraction

New Member

codyGT

New Member

FST BLK Pony

4.6 Rocket

New Member

damien2003gt

New Member

4.6 Rocket

New Member

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.

codyGT

New Member

JonJon

Matto

New Member

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.

codyGT

New Member

JonJon

FST BLK Pony

damien2003gt

New Member

FST BLK Pony

JonJon

codyGT

New Member

Similar threads

took the Bullitt to the track

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

I didn't read this.

I didn't read this.

New Member

New Member

I didn't read this.

I didn't read this.

New Member

New Member

New Member

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency