• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

trac-loc Vs. Open, chime in and state your case.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91conv
  • Start date Start date Jan 6, 2004
9

91conv

New Member
Sep 15, 2003
59
0
0
fenton, mi
Jan 6, 2004
#1
  • Jan 6, 2004
  • #1
Let's hear the pro's and con's of each.
Thanks
 

blue66tang

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,092
0
0
Medford, OR
Jan 6, 2004
#2
  • Jan 6, 2004
  • #2
I dont think there is much of a debate. Trac loc is the way to go. Open only one wheel spins, so why would you want that over trac loc.
 
3

351pacecar

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2001
644
0
0
Hudson, Wisconsin
Jan 6, 2004
#3
  • Jan 6, 2004
  • #3
Not really even an arguement to make, open is useless on anything, I can get tire spin from the automatic tranny 4cyl ranger pickup we have at work with anything other than dry pavement.

Factory clutch type traction locks need rebuilding every now and then depending on use, if you want to avoid that go with something like the powertrax no slip, you hardly know its there but it doesnt have any parts to wear out so it always will work for you.

Car craft loved theirs, until they blew it up with drag slicks and racing. I think that was more due to flex in the rear end though, if you axles start hula dancing itll rip a locker apart real fast.

looks like u have a 91, probably with an 8.8, you could get a traction lock carrier from the junkyard and have it rebuilt and put in you rear end if its an open one for some odd reason. a f150 preload spring will make the tires lock up a little faster too.
 
9

91conv

New Member
Sep 15, 2003
59
0
0
fenton, mi
Jan 6, 2004
#4
  • Jan 6, 2004
  • #4
351pacecar said:
looks like u have a 91, probably with an 8.8, you could get a traction lock carrier from the junkyard and have it rebuilt and put in you rear end if its an open one for some odd reason. a f150 preload spring will make the tires lock up a little faster too.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the detailed reply. This is actually for my 65 with a warmed-up 302 and c4.
 

DarkBuddha

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
2,215
1
47
Seattle & Tampa
Jan 6, 2004
#5
  • Jan 6, 2004
  • #5
This is actually a more tricky question than it seems... Sure there are lots of benefits for a Tracloc or any kind of LSD for cars with limited traction issues. However, if you're not suffering any traction issues then I don't really can't see justifying the extra cost. LSDs have their drawbacks also, like extra heat, stress on gears during turns, etc. These are not an issue with an open diff.

So, if you don't have traction issues, then I would think an open diff should be perfectly fine.
 
R

rmrfstar

New Member
Dec 19, 2003
31
0
0
Chico, CA
Jan 6, 2004
#6
  • Jan 6, 2004
  • #6
In the rain, I got very little traction with an open dif. Trac-Loc means I can do super fast u-turns. Also, it helps to push the car around the turn when driving in the mountains.
 
G

GaPonyFarm

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
663
0
0
Columbus, GA
Jan 6, 2004
#7
  • Jan 6, 2004
  • #7
91conv said:
Thanks for the detailed reply. This is actually for my 65 with a warmed-up 302 and c4.
Click to expand...

Its really a pretty simple formula for the car you have. If you plan on doing normal driving, some city-some highway, and not racing, just use a conventional (open) rearend with around 3.0 gear set (factory type). If you plan on hot rodding on the streets, get yourself a 8.8" or 9" rearend with around 3:55 gear ratio. Anything higher will have your revs too high for comfortable highway driving. I doubt you have plans on taking this car to the strip any time soon.

Hope this helps...
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jan 6, 2004
#8
  • Jan 6, 2004
  • #8
Clutch type diffs offer much more acceleration than opens w/o any real draw backs. My S10 has 195k on it and no problems from the stock lsd. Lockers have some handling quirks about them, but full engage both axles when one is overpowered. The only andvantage I see for open diffs is you can let your wife/gf drive them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Transporting a car question
  • '69Stang
  • Feb 12, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
347
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2025
Jarhead67
J
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
731
Digital Self-tuning Forum Wednesday at 11:51 PM
infamous
Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
D
Foxbody Misfire 5.0 Swap
  • DPORTER0729
  • May 2, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
613
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 13, 2025
90sickfox
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?