• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

tranny questions..

  • Thread starter Thread starter Keasbey
  • Start date Start date May 12, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Keasbey

Member
Jun 12, 2003
915
0
16
Montreal
May 12, 2004
#1
  • May 12, 2004
  • #1
I'm thinking to do a A4LD- T-5 swap.. so I wanted to know if a 85 mustang manual tranny will fit on my 87 stang?

And I wanted to know from the people who do the swap, if it is really hard to do?

thanks
 

ninety2.3

Founding Member
May 4, 2002
186
0
16
PA
May 12, 2004
#2
  • May 12, 2004
  • #2
I may be wrong, but I thought that the pre 87s had a 4 speed manual tranny. So if thats true, I wouldnt want to do that. Someone should say something though.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 13, 2004
#3
  • May 13, 2004
  • #3
The Borg-Warner T-5 came out in 1983 from what I've read but I'm not sure how true that is.

Check out Stingers site he's got some pretty cool imfo on this swap that can help.
 
J

Jayber

New Member
May 9, 2004
32
0
0
May 13, 2004
#4
  • May 13, 2004
  • #4
The 2.3 didnt get the 5spd in N/A form until 87.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 13, 2004
#5
  • May 13, 2004
  • #5
Jayber said:
The 2.3 didnt get the 5spd in N/A form until 87.
Click to expand...

I got two different site on it and they all say 1983 mustang but don't say nothing about 2.3L or 5.0L.

http://www.moderndriveline.com/Technical_Bits/t5_history.htm

http://home.pon.net/hunnicutt/history_79_93.htm

That second one screws up a lot but if its works its got some cool mustang imfo. I also got a few more links on this but I can't find them right now.
 
J

Jayber

New Member
May 9, 2004
32
0
0
May 13, 2004
#6
  • May 13, 2004
  • #6
Mid/Late 83 5.0s got the T5. Until then the SROD 4spd was in the V8 models. I know as I exploded one on starting line back in 83 .
Im not 100% sure of the ID of the 2.3 trannys but it was definately a 4spd.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 13, 2004
#7
  • May 13, 2004
  • #7
Well I found my other imfo site and it had the gear boxes, years, and motors. All the earlier than 85' mustangs that had T-5s was 5.0Ls like everyone said The oldest 2.3L with a T-5 was 1985.
 

ninety2.3

Founding Member
May 4, 2002
186
0
16
PA
May 14, 2004
#8
  • May 14, 2004
  • #8
Pro-Hawk said:
The oldest 2.3L with a T-5 was 1985.
Click to expand...
1984 SVO? It had a T5.

Def check out Stingers site, you should be fine if you can read and know how to use your head and your tools. I dont hear a lot of problems for the T5 to auto swap. I dont know about the 85 tranny into your 87...
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 14, 2004
#9
  • May 14, 2004
  • #9
ninety2.3 said:
1984 SVO? It had a T5.

Def check out Stingers site, you should be fine if you can read and know how to use your head and your tools. I dont hear a lot of problems for the T5 to auto swap. I dont know about the 85 tranny into your 87...
Click to expand...

We was or I was anyways talking N/A 2.3Ls but the site where I got that imfo doesn't say anything about the 1984 SVO having a T-5.

I checked out SVOCA's facts site and its says the 84' SVO had a T-5 and the rest a world class T-5. I'm sure its right since these guys have put a lot of work in restoring these cars and collecting data through the years.

http://www.svoca.com/mainframe.html

Here is that other imfo link that didn't say anything on a 84' SVO having a T-5.

http://www.coolcats.net/tech/advanced/t5data.html
 
D

Demented4.6

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2001
1,055
1
38
DAYTON, OHIO
May 14, 2004
#10
  • May 14, 2004
  • #10
my 86 2.3 has a four speed
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 14, 2004
#11
  • May 14, 2004
  • #11
BOWTIEKILLER said:
my 86 2.3 has a four speed
Click to expand...

That is proof that doing drug on the job is bad or maybe that worker didn't get the memo that Ford was swaping gear boxes Who knows with Ford its all ways something weird.
 
K

ka0tyk

Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
1,610
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
May 15, 2004
#12
  • May 15, 2004
  • #12
dont put a SVO, or 5.0 T5 into your 2.3... the gear ratio's are different... find one from a 2.3 NA mustang...
 

Keasbey

Member
Jun 12, 2003
915
0
16
Montreal
May 15, 2004
#13
  • May 15, 2004
  • #13
ka0tyk said:
dont put a SVO, or 5.0 T5 into your 2.3... the gear ratio's are different... find one from a 2.3 NA mustang...
Click to expand...



okay.. but the one that I could get is a tranny from a 85 mustang N/A

And what about the TC one? it is the same that the SVO I think? right?

thx!
 

i4power

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
1,083
0
0
Eglin AFB, Florida
May 15, 2004
#14
  • May 15, 2004
  • #14
86 and back all had 4-spds in 4 bangers.

Do you want a 4spd? The transmission will work, but be sure to get the bellhousing as well.

The TC and SVO had the same T-5. You won't want to use that one on your car because the gears are taller, which would make the car even slower, and a N/A 2,3 anyways.
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Jul 15, 2004
#15
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #15
RESURECTION>>>>>>>>>

Can you take a non WC tranny and make into a WC?
 

Keasbey

Member
Jun 12, 2003
915
0
16
Montreal
Jul 23, 2004
#16
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #16
I don't know seriously..

I just read all the threads a second time, and I was wondering about what
could happen if I put a N/A transmission with a turbo engine? Does the car will run faster?
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Jul 23, 2004
#17
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #17
Keasbey here is the facts. Any T-5 will work as long as you have the correct parts. 5.0 T-5 needs a different input shaft to work on a 2.3. As for the NON turbo T-5 ???? I have never heard of this animal myself. There is a NON WC and a WC tenas though (World Class) I have been told that the NON will work in the turbo car just fine and 351wcoupe has been beating on his daily and the trans is fine although he keeps messing up the clutch. I am putting in a Non WC T-5 into my car as soon as I get all of the parts.
 

Asha'man

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,909
0
0
Denver
Jul 24, 2004
#18
  • Jul 24, 2004
  • #18
i4power said:
The TC and SVO had the same T-5. You won't want to use that one on your car because the gears are taller, which would make the car even slower, and a N/A 2,3 anyways.
Click to expand...

Achoo!! Sorry, I'm allergic to bull$h!t. (random "I, Robot" reference ).

First gear in the TC/SVO T5 is 3.97, same as the n/a 2.3's. If there is any difference, it's that the TC/SVO unit has a lower first gear, which gives better response off the line. A V8 T5 does have a much steeper first, which will kill a 2.3, but the TC/SVO tranny is definitely desireable.

Ash
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Jul 24, 2004
#19
  • Jul 24, 2004
  • #19
ka0tyk said:
dont put a SVO, or 5.0 T5 into your 2.3... the gear ratio's are different... find one from a 2.3 NA mustang...
Click to expand...

A Human would understand that an 11% chance is enough.

Ash, did I miss something in all that I have read about a T-5 when did the SVO and N/A have a different T-5? The Non Wc was pre 85.5 and arent all T-5 WC post 85.5? Or am I wrong?
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
Jul 24, 2004
#20
  • Jul 24, 2004
  • #20
kiddiccarus said:
A Human would understand that an 11% chance is enough.

Ash, did I miss something in all that I have read about a T-5 when did the SVO and N/A have a different T-5? The Non Wc was pre 85.5 and arent all T-5 WC post 85.5? Or am I wrong?
Click to expand...



Its the gear ratio in the gear boxes thats different A 5.0l T-5 will work in a N/A 2.3L car ( pervided you do something about the imput shaft)but its a different gearing ratio. Thus you run a risk of it being a pain to drive. The same with a SVO gear box in a N.A 2.3L. This stuff is in that link I posted but I guess no one read any of it

Where are you getting your imformation on the 85.5 WC anyways
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Opinions on a possible project car w/ pics
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
10
Views
201
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Mar 30, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
J
Cam for 1989 2.3 4 plug
  • Jaycee1964
  • Dec 12, 2025
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
197
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Dec 14, 2025
AeroCoupe
J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
478
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
K
351w engine swap
  • Killer351w
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
201
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 21, 2026
Killer351w
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?