• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

tri-ax, low or high?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 03redfiregt
  • Start date Start date Feb 11, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

03redfiregt

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
290
0
0
Dracut Ma
Feb 11, 2004
#1
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #1
tir ax, low or high

I have;nt installed my tri ax yet since the car is in hibernation in the garage but i don't know if i should mount the handle in the lower or higher position? I know the higher position is probably the most comfortable wich is why i'm leaning that way but i;m sure alot of people put them in the low position. What are the pros and cons?
 

mrvax

Stay thirsty my friends
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,225
3
79
SN Moderator: Orlando, Fl.
Feb 11, 2004
#2
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #2
Start with the tri-ax installed on it's lowest setting. If you can reach it then stay that way.
 

forpit2000gt

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
2,490
0
0
Columbia, SC
Feb 11, 2004
#3
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #3
IMO you should try it in both and decide for yourself. I don't know of any cons either way. The pro side is that you should not miss a 2-3 shift.
 

Wil

New Member
Jan 2, 2003
581
0
0
Burke, VA
Feb 11, 2004
#4
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #4
I've got mine set on low, I figure the lower the less distance my shifter has to travel for each gear. Come to think of it, I forgot why I chose to go that way. It takes time getting used to from the stock height of the shifter.
 

scalder

Member
Aug 1, 2003
375
0
16
Dallas/Plano TX
Feb 11, 2004
#5
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #5
Go low if you can deal with it. The throw is much, much more positive...and for whatever reason it seemed to make mine a little quieter.
 
X

XStanger

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
383
0
16
Feb 11, 2004
#6
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #6
Low was too low for me. I personally like it in the upper of the 2 postions. You still have a very positive feel when shifting, but you don't have to move your seat up to adjust for the lower setting.
 
3

350HPZ

New Member
Jul 18, 2003
68
0
0
Feb 11, 2004
#7
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #7
High for comfort driving,low for aggresive shifting. mine is high.On the low setting Im working to shift.
 

Venom4.6

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
1,356
0
0
Saint Louis, MO
Feb 11, 2004
#8
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #8
Like someone said before, it's all personal preference.
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Feb 11, 2004
#9
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #9
i tried both settings, found i liked the low setting over the high setting, and went with it
 

downsouthman1

Member
Dec 16, 2003
643
0
16
Texas
Feb 11, 2004
#10
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #10
I also tried both. W/ the lower setting I hear more tranny noise inside my car but I left it that way cuz shifting's somewhat easier & more direct.
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Feb 11, 2004
#11
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #11
I tried both..

first low - loved it..
then switched to high - the throw got longer (longer than the stocker) It shifts easier(doesn't require as much effort) than the low setting but I don't like a long throw..

So I switched back to low and never went back to high.

Bottom line is to try them both and see which you like best.
 

Redfire03GT

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
395
0
0
Newark, CA.
Feb 11, 2004
#12
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #12
Lowest, only way to go. Although, I shift just as fast with the short throw as I did with the stock shifter I don't think there's any way for me to shift faster unless I get an adjustable clutch cable or something of that nature. 0_o
 

01BlkGT

Founding Member
Jan 22, 2002
1,015
0
36
ATX
Feb 11, 2004
#13
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #13
Installed it with the low setting and never looked back...
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Feb 11, 2004
#14
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #14
01BlkGT said:
Installed it with the low setting and never looked back...
Click to expand...

 

Dallasgt01

New Member
Dec 31, 2003
204
0
0
Dallas, Texas
Feb 11, 2004
#15
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #15
I Have a 5.0 shifter in my gt and i bought a aftermarket shifterhandle and they make it sit REALLY low and in the cobra i have a tri-ax it also is on low... IMO i would say low shorter throw distance.
 

warment

Founding Member
Aug 23, 2000
339
0
0
Spotsylvania, VA
Feb 11, 2004
#16
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #16
I tried both. Lowest first, then highest. Liked the highest much better. It is easier to reach, and my tranny seems to shift easier at the highest setting. The 1-2 shift in the lowest setting is more difficult than the highest. Just my opinion...

Bill
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
Feb 11, 2004
#17
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #17
Low setting here!!!
 
T

tripsober

New Member
May 18, 2003
217
0
0
massachusetts
Feb 11, 2004
#18
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #18
is there a happy medium?
 

GTblack_00

New Member
Mar 23, 2003
494
0
0
Tampa Bay Area, FL
Feb 11, 2004
#19
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #19
Low setting Again!!
The low setting makes shifting a breeze for me and trannys last longer! The low setting gives you more positive shifts and shorter throw. I have noticed that it isnt as noisy as it was when it was mounted high.
 

98LazerGT

New Member
Sep 17, 2003
47
0
0
San Diego
Feb 11, 2004
#20
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #20
I have mine on the low setting. I don't really have any problems reaching it or anything but I do have long monkey arms.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
High idle issue and leaking after running.
  • PHoffman
  • Dec 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
469
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 24, 2024
General karthief
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
503
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?