• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Trick Flow Vs gt40 Manifold

  • Thread starter Thread starter gungfusemaj
  • Start date Start date Dec 14, 2003

gungfusemaj

Member
Dec 13, 2003
211
0
16
Bradenton Fl
Dec 14, 2003
#1
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #1
which is better I bought the Trick manifold Kit "street" I have stock cam,heads etc. I<m going to use a BBK 65mm TH BDY.... Also SHould i go mass air what's the point with stock?????
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 14, 2003
#2
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #2
Both perform well on stock style cars but the GT-40 is limited to porting the lower only in the future.

What year is the car? MAF is a great thing and really needs to be considered when you start changing the heads and cam.
 

1Stang2Go

Founding Member
Feb 4, 2002
389
16
39
CT
Dec 14, 2003
#3
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #3
They are both good intakes. The GT-40 intake is probably better on a mild (stock heads, cam) engine. The TFS may make a little more power on a modified motor over the GT-40. It really depeneds on how modified you go though.
I run a GT-40 intake on my car and it runs really great. I've thought about swapping to a performer or performer II intake but I'm really happy with how the car is running.
Mass Air is the way to go. Cars with Mass Air respond to mods much better than SD. So I'm told. Never had a SD stang...
Hope this helps..
 

gungfusemaj

Member
Dec 13, 2003
211
0
16
Bradenton Fl
Dec 14, 2003
#4
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #4
sorry 87 gt
 
M

Mean88

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
656
0
16
Dec 14, 2003
#5
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #5
Posted by 1Stang2Go - Today at 10:29 AM

Mass Air is the way to go. Cars with Mass Air respond to mods much better than SD. So I'm told. Never had a SD stang...
Hope this helps..

Who told you that? I have an 88gt sd with h/c/i, 1.7's, and a 70mm tb that pulls 105.06, and runs 13.228. I was bogging bigtime on the line (new to the strip, need to learn how to launch. I have 255/50/16 bfg drs, and I pulled a 2.0 60ft on the 13.2 run(crappy driving). The only thing I adjusted on the engine was the fuel pressure. The car should run 12's with the right driving, it wieghs 3360 with me in it.

There is another member on here, I think his name is stock50lx, he runs 12.66 and 110mph, with an 87lx sd that has ported explorer heads and intake, he still has the stock suspension, injectors, and the stock cam. His 60fts are about 1.7 range or so.

Why would you say that sd is bad? My car runs like a raped ape, and idles as smooth as stock with the crower cam I have. It isnt hard at all to make a sd fly.
Ted
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Dec 14, 2003
#6
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #6
i have a gt-40 intake and im extremely happy with it, couldnt ask for anything more
 

1Stang2Go

Founding Member
Feb 4, 2002
389
16
39
CT
Dec 14, 2003
#7
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #7
I never said it was bad..I have no experience with SD cars. I'm just going by what I've heard. I know you can make anything fast...But if SD is just as good as Mass Air, why do so many people convert thier SD cars to Mass air? Especially with blowers and turbos...
the motors from 88-89 are exactly the same besides the 88 being SD, and the 89 being MA. Hp ratings were up between the two years. Ratings are ratings, and paper numbers are just that. I know stock for stock, SD cars may be a little faster (MAF meter being a restriction in the intake...again, nothing to base this on other than what I've been told) Again, if SD was sufficient, why did ford switch to MA? Gas milage? Performance? drivability? All three...
There is nothing wrong with SD...But from what I've heard and read, mass air is superior....
 

1Stang2Go

Founding Member
Feb 4, 2002
389
16
39
CT
Dec 14, 2003
#8
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #8
The Gt-40 upper can be improved. Extrude honed. Its expensive, and really doesn't yield that much more of a gain.
There are also people out there that cut the dog leg out of the runner between the tb and plenum. Its easier and more cost effective just to by an intake that has higher flow numbers...
I like my GT-40...
just thought I'd mention that
 

gungfusemaj

Member
Dec 13, 2003
211
0
16
Bradenton Fl
Dec 14, 2003
#9
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #9
How much Hsp will I gain...

How much Horspower will I gain From Adding a Trickflow Manifold kit,BBk Throttle body 65MM Stock everything else no smog,87 gt cervinis ram air kit ....would Igain more to upgrade my fuel injectors.
 

1Stang2Go

Founding Member
Feb 4, 2002
389
16
39
CT
Dec 14, 2003
#10
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #10
The 19's will be ok until you swap heads. Even then, you may still be able to get away with them.
The intake, TB, and a new MAF will add a good amount of power. You'll defiantly notice it. I'm guessing maybe 25-30 hp over stock...
Anyone else?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Dec 14, 2003
#11
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #11
The GT40 has smaller cross section runners. For power bands less than 6,250 rpm, the GT40 will probably make more average torque and HP than the larger runner Track Heat.

You can mod SD quite far, you just have to be careful about your choice of cams. Mean88 - which Crower do you run? The 15511 and the 15510 are favorites in the SD community.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
526
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Engine EGR spacer for explorer 65mm TB?
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
386
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2024
Noobz347
8
Fox Mass Air Flow 42lb injectors
  • 89wreck
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
774
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
Scrapla347
Engine Sick of stock TB and EGR spacer...
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
668
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 19, 2024
General karthief
For Sale Ford 331 stroker engine for sale - with options!
  • TTSaleen
  • Wednesday at 8:21 AM
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
158
Engine and Power Adder Thursday at 10:03 PM
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?