• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

turbo kit modification

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95stangGT
  • Start date Start date Sep 14, 2004
9

95stangGT

Founding Member
Jan 13, 2002
513
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Sep 14, 2004
#1
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #1
I have been looking at my kit installed and have had a few ideas.
For one, my bypass valve is pressed right up against my fender. Would make mounting another BOV very difficult. Then I have wanted to convert to a fox body intake/throttle body setup. Lastly with the draw-through meter, it places the air filter low to the ground and exposed. Since this is an everyday summer driver, I would like to move it. So here is what I came up with.
With the fox body intake I should be able to creat enough of a straight pipe to the throttle body to mount a Pro-M bullet or universal. (Haven't researched this part yet) But whatever blow through meter would work best. Then I would be able to move and switch to a Greddy type S BOV and mount it pretty much anywhere there is room. With the meter gone then, I should be also able to seclude the air filter out of the elements more.
Whats everyone think? Any pros or cons to this? Would really like to hear some imput on this. Thanks
 

Big Jay

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
130
0
0
Tucson, Az.
Sep 14, 2004
#2
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #2
Need pics. I would love to help. What kit are you running?
 
9

95stangGT

Founding Member
Jan 13, 2002
513
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Sep 14, 2004
#3
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #3
It is a PTK street kit with a T67. Try to get pics up shortly.
 

donjohn

New Member
Feb 7, 2004
1,757
0
0
Irvine - Southern California
Sep 14, 2004
#4
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #4
sounds fine and looks like you already have it figured out... kinda hard to picture everything together without pics.

the fox tb will give you a few extra inches, i dunno, i'd like some pics so i don't say something retarded like - why can't you just shorten the pipe to the maf so the filter clears fine
 
9

95stangGT

Founding Member
Jan 13, 2002
513
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Sep 14, 2004
#5
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #5
[/IMG]

This is the only picture I have at the moment.
 

donjohn

New Member
Feb 7, 2004
1,757
0
0
Irvine - Southern California
Sep 14, 2004
#6
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #6
this looks a lot like a single kit and i can't help but ask why it's not on the apposite side... but i'm sure it's a twin, just can't see the other side

anyways, i see what u mean about the fox tb giving you that extra room. can't really see everything happening down there but it sounds like u've got everything in order already

doesn't march(or somebody) have a kit which relocates the alternator to the opposite side (don't know what it's like over there, and i think it's if u've already given up ur ps) because that would give you a ton more room
 
9

95stangGT

Founding Member
Jan 13, 2002
513
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Sep 14, 2004
#7
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #7
nope, its a single. PTK and HP both place their turbos on the passenger side.
 

donjohn

New Member
Feb 7, 2004
1,757
0
0
Irvine - Southern California
Sep 14, 2004
#8
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #8
95stangGT said:
nope, its a single. PTK and HP both place their turbos on the passenger side.
Click to expand...

that's completely retarded (probably easier to cross over the tubes there and less tubing to route everything). a battery relocation would be much easier/nicer than trying to stuff everything on the passenger side i'd think.

is there anyway you could relocate it to the drivers side... i don't know if that's even an option but it would open up a lot of room, or even the alternator relocation like i said

i dunno, maybe it's just that i like things not to be all cramped together but if it works like it is now, i guess it's fine. luck
 
9

95stangGT

Founding Member
Jan 13, 2002
513
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Sep 14, 2004
#9
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #9
donjohn said:
that's completely retarded (probably easier to cross over the tubes there and less tubing to route everything). a battery relocation would be much easier/nicer than trying to stuff everything on the passenger side i'd think.

is there anyway you could relocate it to the drivers side... i don't know if that's even an option but it would open up a lot of room, or even the alternator relocation like i said

i dunno, maybe it's just that i like things not to be all cramped together but if it works like it is now, i guess it's fine. luck
Click to expand...

I would have loved if the turbo was mounted on the drivers side where the battery was. But it would be like starting over. The intercooler would have to be changed along with all the piping. I'd be better off selling the kit then.
 

SorsCode

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 10, 2003
1,020
428
113
St. Louis, MO
Sep 14, 2004
#10
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #10
Cartech is on the Passanger side also
 

donjohn

New Member
Feb 7, 2004
1,757
0
0
Irvine - Southern California
Sep 14, 2004
#11
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #11
95stangGT said:
I would have loved if the turbo was mounted on the drivers side where the battery was. But it would be like starting over. The intercooler would have to be changed along with all the piping. I'd be better off selling the kit then.
Click to expand...

hell no am i tryng to discourage you here, keep the thing, it'd be a lot of work the other way (of course ur gonna have to do some work this way too). i'd say throw on the fox tb and gauge what to do from there! they're relatively cheap to do a swap anyhow right?

edit: hmm, i just noticed u have the stock maifold which has the huge elbow, u'd have more room wiht the fox tb and an aftermarket manifold. besides, i think ur gonna need a new manifold to let all that air from the turbo in

u could also look into a stand alone system. all i know about this system is that there is no more need for a maf... worth checking up on. i researched it a while back and some will swear by it and others it has only given them problems.

just things to think about, if you already have a good idea as what to do, go for it
 

Big Jay

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
130
0
0
Tucson, Az.
Sep 14, 2004
#12
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #12
The space limitations are slim on the driver side. Hence the pass side location is ideal.
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Sep 14, 2004
#13
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #13
on the drivers side, you have to worry about the bottom radiator hose, PS line, brake booster, master cylinder, steering shaft, fuse box, and some wires... Keep it on the pass side since its allready there.

You'd have to start all over form scratch if you were to change the location of the turbo, plus theres very little room on the drivers side for a downpipe.
 
9

95stangGT

Founding Member
Jan 13, 2002
513
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Sep 14, 2004
#14
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #14
donjohn said:
hell no am i tryng to discourage you here, keep the thing, it'd be a lot of work the other way (of course ur gonna have to do some work this way too). i'd say throw on the fox tb and gauge what to do from there! they're relatively cheap to do a swap anyhow right?

edit: hmm, i just noticed u have the stock maifold which has the huge elbow, u'd have more room wiht the fox tb and an aftermarket manifold. besides, i think ur gonna need a new manifold to let all that air from the turbo in

u could also look into a stand alone system. all i know about this system is that there is no more need for a maf... worth checking up on. i researched it a while back and some will swear by it and others it has only given them problems.

just things to think about, if you already have a good idea as what to do, go for it
Click to expand...

No worries, there is no way I'm selling this and starting over. lol I have plans to had a systemax II intake this winter with a fox throttle body. Hence the whole reason for this post. I just wanted opinions on whether I would be able to throw a blow-through meter on that pipe to have it work right.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 14, 2004
#15
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #15
If you actually look at the motor, it is easier to route the exhaust up the ride side. The left side has the AC compressor, and hoses in the way. Makes it tougher when you have to run a lot of exhaust pieces through there.

Kurt
 

donjohn

New Member
Feb 7, 2004
1,757
0
0
Irvine - Southern California
Sep 14, 2004
#16
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #16
well i was thinking ps delete, battery relocation and wire hide (including the fuse box) so that's why i like the driver's side
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
Sep 15, 2004
#17
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #17
is your car completly stock with the turbo kit? if so what power are you making? what are you trapping at?
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 15, 2004
#18
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #18
donjohn said:
well i was thinking ps delete, battery relocation and wire hide (including the fuse box) so that's why i like the driver's side
Click to expand...

Perfectly logical to do so, but usually when they make a turbo kit, they usually make it to accomodate most stock equipment.

Kurt
 
9

95stangGT

Founding Member
Jan 13, 2002
513
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Sep 15, 2004
#19
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #19
BlueOvalStangGT said:
is your car completly stock with the turbo kit? if so what power are you making? what are you trapping at?
Click to expand...

Car is stock minus ASP underdrive pullies, mac prochamber, and flowmaster catback. No dyno numbers or track times yet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
Fox Mass Air Flow 42lb injectors
  • 89wreck
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
701
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
Scrapla347
H
turbo advice
  • hawkinsdrag
  • May 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
421
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2025
hoopty5.0
Who the hell puts the wrong spark plugs in a 3.8L?
  • snowstang
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
367
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
LILCBRA
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
566
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Engine Sick of stock TB and EGR spacer...
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
619
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 19, 2024
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?