• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

turbo vs supercharged

  • Thread starter Thread starter snakedoc98
  • Start date Start date Nov 11, 2009
S

snakedoc98

New Member
Sep 27, 2009
30
0
0
oceanside, CA
Nov 11, 2009
#1
  • Nov 11, 2009
  • #1
hey guys, I know exactly what I am doing with my car except the engine. My goal is 700 rwhp. I will get back from deployment next october and then I am going to build my motor. My budget for the motor is 13K so I hope I can reach my goal with this amount. I had a 91 sc in college and really like the sound of them but I dont think I will be able to reach my hp goal with a supercharger. Any shop I have talked to they say go twin turbo but I think the sound of the blow off valve sounds... well gay. Can anyone point me in the right direction.
 

88blowngt

New Member
Jun 29, 2009
68
0
0
Dover, Delaware
Nov 11, 2009
#2
  • Nov 11, 2009
  • #2
Yeah you CAN reach 700 hp with a supercharger. A very large unit can do the trick.
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Nov 11, 2009
#3
  • Nov 11, 2009
  • #3
Single turbo. Most power for the money easily. As far as the turbo sounding "gay" you obviously haven't heard a mean ass turbo 5.0 before. Nothing "gay about it
 

faststang90

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2007
522
16
49
baytown texas
Nov 12, 2009
#4
  • Nov 12, 2009
  • #4
r u going to a different block or do u have a good 1 already.what fuel system
do u have,what tranny,what rear end. do u have a good 8.8.does it have bigger axles in it. if u have all that i would go to a single turbo about a t-76. thier are some nice kits out there.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Nov 12, 2009
#5
  • Nov 12, 2009
  • #5
snakedoc98 said:
hey guys, I know exactly what I am doing with my car except the engine. My goal is 700 rwhp. I will get back from deployment next october and then I am going to build my motor. My budget for the motor is 13K so I hope I can reach my goal with this amount. I had a 91 sc in college and really like the sound of them but I dont think I will be able to reach my hp goal with a supercharger. Any shop I have talked to they say go twin turbo but I think the sound of the blow off valve sounds... well gay. Can anyone point me in the right direction.
Click to expand...

If you want you motor to sound like its got 700 hp, get a pair of 3.5 inch spintech pro streets. Blowoff valves dont have to sound like paul walker or vin diesel is driving the car...

Do some reading. Its pretty obvious by the way you asked your questions that you dont know much about turbos. Go single, 351+cubic inches and a 76mm or 88mm compressor size. You can do it with a 8.2 deck motor, but expect to be getting your hands dirty, cause with high boost numbers come big headaches.

Not trying to be a dck here just to clear that up, im probly coming off like that, but seriously its the internet There is alot to turbos, and there are a TON of places to do research on them, lots of books you can buy, and other tubro specific forums that you can search on.
 

rbonella

Member
Dec 15, 2008
409
6
19
@ home
Nov 12, 2009
#6
  • Nov 12, 2009
  • #6
351+ and vortech ysi/Novi2000/TFS or AFR's= done
 
S

snakedoc98

New Member
Sep 27, 2009
30
0
0
oceanside, CA
Nov 15, 2009
#7
  • Nov 15, 2009
  • #7
well I made up my mind, I'm going with the supercharger route. I got the rear end built I just dont know if a tremec tko 600 will hold down 750hp. I have a local dealer building me the motor while I am deployed for 7 months. The car is getting a new interior and getting painted. I dont know if I want to go a deeper red or go with a ford factory orange. Is there anyone out there making this kind of power than can steer me away from some of the mistakes they made?
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Nov 15, 2009
#8
  • Nov 15, 2009
  • #8
Big horsepower is the best way to find flaws in your setup. At 750hp any TINY weak link will be seen. 750hp is a huge investment, just making it into that range is only half the battle. Sounds like your going to be doing a lot of research, and 750 would be easier on a more efficient power adder(turbo), but it's not my car
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 16, 2009
#9
  • Nov 16, 2009
  • #9
what are you gonna be doing with the car?
 

dcurtis

10 Year Member
Jan 19, 2006
688
7
39
Nov 16, 2009
#10
  • Nov 16, 2009
  • #10
Procharger.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 16, 2009
#11
  • Nov 16, 2009
  • #11
500hp shot of the sauce
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,109
2,726
224
Vass, NC
Nov 16, 2009
#12
  • Nov 16, 2009
  • #12
ask more specific questions. My car dynoed 762rwhp on pump gas and has a whole hell of a lot more left in the motor. I'd be happy to answer any questions you have, but I don't have any answers to the blanket "what did you do wrong" question.

The TKO600 will hold up just fine at 750hp or even 750 rwhp. My "TKO" - the old one that isn't the TKO500 or 600 - is rated at 450 ft-lbs of torque and I've been abusing it on ET Street radials without any issues. Of course the car doesn't hook worth a damn when the pedal is on the floor, which is probably beneficial to the tranny since the spinning rear tires keep from putting all of the force through the ttranny.

Chris
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,037
1,625
194
NJ
Nov 16, 2009
#13
  • Nov 16, 2009
  • #13
If you are speaking rwhp, and you are paying for all the work, i don't think you are going to get it done for 13 grand.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Nov 16, 2009
#14
  • Nov 16, 2009
  • #14
tannerc91gt said:
Big horsepower is the best way to find flaws in your setup. At 750hp any TINY weak link will be seen. 750hp is a huge investment, just making it into that range is only half the battle. Sounds like your going to be doing a lot of research, and 750 would be easier on a more efficient power adder(turbo), but it's not my car
Click to expand...

true... turbo will be the easiest on the motor... but cost the most...

blower 2nd but it puts a pretty good strain on the crank...

nitrous being the cheapest but it will hit the drive line the hardest and be the hardest on everything

funny how all that works out

2000xp8 said:
If you are speaking rwhp, and you are paying for all the work, i don't think you are going to get it done for 13 grand.
Click to expand...

nope... and even if you do it yourself 13K is might get you through the first build... but your going to break ****

Shaolin Crane said:
500hp shot of the sauce
Click to expand...

hitting a motor with a shot that big is more of a head ache then people think
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Nov 16, 2009
#15
  • Nov 16, 2009
  • #15
srtthis said:
hitting a motor with a shot that big is more of a head ache then people think
Click to expand...

sarcasm is normally lost on the forums...
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Nov 16, 2009
#16
  • Nov 16, 2009
  • #16
Shaolin Crane said:
sarcasm is normally lost on the forums...
Click to expand...

yea... there needs to be a font for that... ive seen people joke about stuff like that and people try it and... well im sure you get the picture
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
862
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
667
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
B
2001 v6 New compressor issue
  • badmech
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
99
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2026
badmech
B
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
752
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?