• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Unisteer Rack & Pinion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stangninjak
  • Start date Start date Oct 17, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Next
First Prev 7 of 10 Next Last
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Dec 4, 2006
#121
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #121
LMan said:
"photos not found"
Click to expand...


me too.
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Dec 4, 2006
#122
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #122
this darn machine.
give me something mechanical any day.

it won't work.
and it says my pic's are too big to upload here.
 

LW_horse

Member
Oct 31, 2006
37
0
6
Sweden
Dec 5, 2006
#123
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #123
Unisteer installation instruction manual

I got my Rack yesterday.

I've made a PDF version of the "Unisteer installation manual" in case I'd misplace the paper version that was in the box.

The Unisteer manual covers alot of questions asked in this thread, and the pictures are very "illustrative". Manual covers 65-66 & 67-70 kits.

If someone would like a copy of the manual in PDF; please send me an email, and I'll be happy to reply the manual.

Please observe that the size of the PDF-file is approx. 9,5MB.

Merry Christmas to all of you.
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Dec 5, 2006
#124
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #124
Ok, the steering column rework came next.
Using a 4 in cutoff wheel in the hand held worked great.
but here are a few tips that the instructions did not cover,
after you cut the column cover there is an inner sleeve that needs to be cut as well. it MUST be cut shorter than the outter cover because the new end roller bearing must be pressed into the outer cover.
Use a round file to bevel the lip and the shaft end. And use sandpaper on the shaft to clean it will make installation much easier.

Now pin the U-joint making sure the end does not stick past into the opening or you Will have binding in the joint. reinstall column to start the mock up for shaft measuring.
This will be a long trial and trim to make the u-joint as close to straight as possable.
After at least 6 times in and out it became apperent that there was no way to make a smooth connection from U-joint to U-joint because of the header tube clearence.
Now this is where having a porta-power tool came in handy,
I used it to spread the header tubes to allow room so the shaft did not catch on the tubes.

Once clearence was made, it allowed the shaft to be slid in and measured with ease, I only had to trim off about 1/4in and make the screw landing to lock the joint down.
Now you can install the H-joint and adjust it to hold the shaft at the proper angle.
Centering the rack to make phasing the U-joints is very important.
IF you don't have the joints at least 45 degrees out,
You Will have binding when turning left or right.
a very easily over looked part of the install.

I installed the tie rod ends and set the toe by eye for now, it will be fully alined later.

With a couple of mile test drive done, it is not too hard to steer.
If I had a standard steering wheel ( has a small Grant wheel now)
the effort to turn is not the bad at a standing stop.
Road feel is greatly improved and there is no lag like the stock power unit had.
Steers quite well when moving, not much more effot than the stock unit,
maybe less with a larger steering wheel.

Bottom line...........
The unit does work.
Now it does take some thinking and planning to install and could be frusterating to some. Not a task that all should take on if you don't have the right tools.
But it does work and even removing the power steering pump gave it a little quicker throttle responce so there is a extra plus.

PB
 
6

68efisuper

New Member
Nov 29, 2005
32
0
0
Dec 5, 2006
#125
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #125
Just got back from a test drive with the new rack installed. All I can say is wow. The car drives so much better. 3 turns lock to lock is unbelievable. It turns at low speed easier then it did before and at highway speeds it is now a pleasure to drive. The ratio is fast enough so you barely turn the wheel at speed and the car moves. It was worth all the effort. Have a great Holiday.
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Dec 5, 2006
#126
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #126
P.S. I have pic's of complete install if someone can show me how to post them so they are not so small you can't see the details.


Come on! :SNSign:

PB
 

geostang351

Member
Mar 30, 2005
946
0
17
Danb., CT
Dec 5, 2006
#127
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #127
Put them on photobucket.com then call them up on your thread/post.
 

dbfarr

Member
Sep 17, 2005
191
0
17
Boise ID
Dec 5, 2006
#128
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #128
it won't work.
and it says my pic's are too big to upload here.
Click to expand...

Your camera probably takes picts at high resolution. You'll need some imaging editing software to shrink the images down a bit.

Try this software:

http://www.download.com/Pixia/3000-2192_4-10515468.html?tag=lst-0-3

open your photo

got to image>make resized duplicate

screen shot
http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l212/dbfarr/help1copy.jpg

a dialogue box will pop up

screen shot
http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l212/dbfarr/help2.jpg

enter 500 for the width

hit "ok"

your new resized photo will show up

screen shot
http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l212/dbfarr/help3.jpg

go to file>save as

a dialogue box will pop up

give the photo a name

*** CRITICAL : in the drop down menu, make sure you change the file type to jpeg: of course I didn't think of this when I made the screenshot.

screen shot
http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l212/dbfarr/help4.jpg
Upload the photo you just made to photobucket.

They should be small enough in pixel and disc size to upload.

Hopefully this helps.

My guess is, your camera's resolution is so high that the actual size of the photo is not supported by photobucket
 
P

Protowrxs

Member
Jul 20, 2005
93
0
6
Oklahoma
Dec 5, 2006
#129
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #129
I think this is the link no?
http://s145.photobucket.com/albums/r237/mach1rider/

I just searched for mach1rider from the search box.

Nice to hear one installed and working. Still nobody with a 69/70 I don't guess?

The header issue is going to bite me I'm pretty sure. Guess I need to drop a block/head/tranny in and get ready. I think my Cobra pan might be an issue too??

Edit: Oh, forgot to say if you're using WinXP you should be able to just RIGHT click on the image and use RESIZE PICTURE option. Use 800x600 or 640x480 and they should work.

-Stephen
 

stangman67

Member
Feb 8, 2003
294
0
17
connecticut
Dec 5, 2006
#130
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #130
What headers did the both of you use? Thanks.
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Dec 5, 2006
#131
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #131
I have FlowTech long tube headers on.
and only needed to open the tube space slightly.

Now if this works, I typed in the address bar.

http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r237/mach1rider/

and I see all 11 pic's that I have posted there without logging on.

The 69-70 should be the same as my 68, from what I could tell.

I just couldn't bring myself to chop into the Mach right now.

But the price for the rack system was too good to pass,
585.65 delivered to my door.

PB
 
P

Protowrxs

Member
Jul 20, 2005
93
0
6
Oklahoma
Dec 5, 2006
#132
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #132
Mine is back ordered with the rest of them I guess.

First ship date of 12/04, then 12/08, now 12/09?? <shrugs>

I think you're missing a 'dot' up there.. this still works:

http://s145.photobucket.com/albums/r237/mach1rider/

Thanks for the pics!
-Stephen
 
6

68efisuper

New Member
Nov 29, 2005
32
0
0
Dec 8, 2006
#133
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #133
What angles did you end up with on the u-joints?
 

SnakeStang65

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
160
0
0
Jasper, Indiana
Dec 12, 2006
#134
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #134
Delayed!!!

Sorry for the delay on the Rack. I have been unable to get any time off from work due to the holidays. On the bright side, I will have 2 weeks starting next week to get it installed. I should have a detailed update at that point.

John
 

Stangninjak

Member
Apr 16, 2004
324
2
19
Dec 12, 2006
#135
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #135
Delayed as well

Yeah I have been swamp with projects and updates, plus my mechanic been backlog, so I have not been able to get my car on the lift..Hopefully though I will get my car up soon and get his done !
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Dec 12, 2006
#136
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #136
68efisuper said:
What angles did you end up with on the u-joints?
Click to expand...

The rack joint has about 28* angle and there is 12-14* on the colume joint that is first on the shaft,
the secound half of the joint (67-70) has a 3-4* angle to it But,
When I pull the engine out I think I can shorten the colume shaft slightly to remove it.

So far it's only problem is, It has caused me to plan a coil drop and rear suspension upgrade.
 

SnakeStang65

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
160
0
0
Jasper, Indiana
Dec 18, 2006
#137
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #137
Good news and bad news...

I finally got started on the rack install.

Good news for the 65-66 owners... It clears the oil pan without issue. Over 3/8" clearance.

The bad news is that tube number 5 is completely in the wrong position to run the steering shaft. The shaft needs to run between tubes 5 and 6 and there is no space on my Hooker Comps to run the tube. The photos that I have seen of Comps before have a space between them like the ones in the manual, but my set does not have any space between 5 and 6. Looks like I will have to buy a new set of headers to get the rack to install. At this point, I am not willing to do that.


Here is a photo of my header and what the instructions show.

Check your headers before ordering. Good luck to others...
 

Attachments

  • Header.webp
    21 KB · Views: 447
  • Shaft.webp
    53.7 KB · Views: 466
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Dec 18, 2006
#138
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #138
i think Pabear just wenr through that on his install and he used a port a power to seperate the tubes enough for the shaft. also i think the difference is that one of those sets of headers is hooker comp headers and the other set is of hooker super comps, there is a big difference between the 2
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Dec 18, 2006
#139
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #139
Yes, there was a slight gap between the tubes to start.
But working slow and moving it down the tubes I spread them enough to make room+ for the shaft without denting or cracking the coating and no leaks eather.



PB
 
A

andrewVA

New Member
Oct 13, 2004
20
0
1
Dec 19, 2006
#140
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #140
This is one of the reasons Im happy Im building a turbocharged straight 6 200. No exhaust tubes to contend with on the steering shaft side.

Has anyone else gotten this rack installed though and can give us some more real world feedback on steering effort and road feel?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Next
First Prev 7 of 10 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3.73 Install
  • sen2two
  • Dec 21, 2013
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 23, 2013
84Ttop
help me pick a shifter...with options!
  • robertdeuce
  • Jul 18, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
47
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 26, 2011
Mustang5L5
my cart at jegs! should I checkout?
  • robertdeuce
  • Jul 18, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 19, 2011
Noobz347
Long..Would like some opnions on products for rebuild
  • Pops Fun
  • Nov 27, 2009
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jan 15, 2010
ProKiller
NASCAR style belt drive, where?
  • DK832
  • May 12, 2008
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 14, 2008
DK832
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?