• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

UPR K member kits....good or bad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98blackstallion
  • Start date Start date Sep 16, 2006

98blackstallion

Member
Mar 30, 2005
602
0
17
mtn home arkansas
Sep 16, 2006
#1
  • Sep 16, 2006
  • #1
Hey guys what the deal on the UPR k member kits? Are they good or do i need to stay away from them? Im considering doing this while i put the new motor in my car ya know...Just let me know guys thanks
 

nwapache

New Member
Jun 27, 2006
313
0
0
Seattle,WA
Sep 16, 2006
#2
  • Sep 16, 2006
  • #2
are you trying to save money? Why not go with MM and not have to worry about QC?
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Sep 16, 2006
#3
  • Sep 16, 2006
  • #3
i have read more then a few people complain about the fitment on them.
I would go with the Griggs Racing or MM
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Sep 16, 2006
#4
  • Sep 16, 2006
  • #4
you get what you pay for, most people complain about fitment issues, grinding away etc..
 

uhoh5.0

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
354
0
17
Montgomery, AL
Sep 16, 2006
#5
  • Sep 16, 2006
  • #5
I just purchased their kit with the tubular a-arms, k-member, and coil overs. It was very well made. I'm happy with it so far, but only had it for a couple of days.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Sep 16, 2006
#6
  • Sep 16, 2006
  • #6
ya, they are only good for drag racing. i installed one of hteir older ones on a car about a year ago, and i wasnt very pleased with the construction(note, not on my car). the welds were very poor and it just looked weak.
 

jasonh_86

I
May 20, 2005
1,156
2
48
Arkansas
Sep 17, 2006
#7
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #7
Maximum Motorsports, AJE and PA racing would be good setups.. However, MM won't save you a whole lot of weight.

I'll be going with PA Racing K-member/A-arms this winter tho
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Sep 17, 2006
#8
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #8
true, you dont save a lot of weight with teh MM one, however you do gain better suspension geometry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension UPR Coilover sleeve dosent drop down over strut
  • Creomod
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
424
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2025
RaggedGT
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
511
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
D
Resolved Vortech hitting hood
  • Dchichizola
  • May 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 18, 2025
General karthief
P
Air Fuel ratio bung location.
  • Praetorious
  • Feb 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
960
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 11, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?