• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Urethane vs Rubber tranny mounts

  • Thread starter Thread starter dirty slut
  • Start date Start date Nov 15, 2005

pick one

  • Urethane is better for the tranny

    Votes: 13 92.9%
  • Rubber is better for the tranny

    Votes: 1 7.1%

  • Total voters
    14
D

dirty slut

New Member
Nov 12, 2005
59
0
0
Nov 15, 2005
#1
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #1
Im not too concerend w/ a rougher ride I just want what is absolutley best for the tranny, is it a urethane or a factory replacment rubber mount, as mine are blown. Thanks!! :SNSign:
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 15, 2005
#2
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #2
Urethane will last longer, rubber will be more plush ride.

I would suggest sending a private message to a moderator to get your screenname changed...that isn't to suitable. Or just reregister
 
D

dirty slut

New Member
Nov 12, 2005
59
0
0
Nov 15, 2005
#3
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #3
ok but which is better for the tranny? Urethane will obviously be much stiffer, but will it cause drivetrain shock or is it recomended over rubber.
 
8

87gtconv

ragtopman
Founding Member
Feb 11, 1999
2,595
0
0
Southern Calif
Nov 15, 2005
#4
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #4
I am a poly man and for the tranny can't think of a single reason not to use it for street cars. I use it and really it is as smooth as my rubber mount which was old but functional. Tranny mounts are not quite as critical as motor mounts as far as smothness is concerned anyways. Mine is NOT harsh at all.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Nov 16, 2005
#5
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #5
I have poly tranny and motor mounts and I like them a lot.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Nov 16, 2005
#6
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #6
I agree with all of the above. As said, the trans mount is not as crucial in transferring vibration as the motor mounts. And having it hold up better is a nice plus. They are cheap too (I would have gone all poly had poly motor mounts not been so expensive).

Dont forget the crossmember bushings too.

Good luck.
 
8

87gtconv

ragtopman
Founding Member
Feb 11, 1999
2,595
0
0
Southern Calif
Nov 16, 2005
#7
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #7
HISSIN50 I did replace my crossmember bushing with poly but after 120,000 miles and 17 years they were really in good shape. Now my tranny mount was showing its age.
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Nov 16, 2005
#8
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #8
My rubber tranny mount didn't seem bad when I took it out - no cracks or anything - but with the poly in there, WOW, it made a heckuva difference in shift feel and regular driving. My gearshift isn't wobbling all over the place going down the road, and I don't see my shifter doing a funny dance every time I hit a bump/dip in the road. You do get a tad bit more vibration through the shifter, but nothing that resonates throughout the car or anything that serious.

Now, I just gotta figure out why it looks as though my whole drivetrain is cocked a few degrees clockwise, like I got a droopy passenger-side motor mount, and thereby threatening to tear up my new ES poly trans mount...
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Nov 16, 2005
#9
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #9
5spd GT said:
I would suggest sending a private message to a moderator to get your screenname changed...that isn't to suitable. Or just reregister
Click to expand...

What is this, kindergarten? Who cares what his name is, we're all adults
 

CoupedUp

Banned
Aug 26, 2005
260
0
0
Gone Fishing
Nov 16, 2005
#10
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #10
vikingpower said:
What is this, kindergarten? Who cares what his name is, we're all adults
Click to expand...

... well, some of us are (interpret this whichever way makes you feel good) ...

Poly is better for the tranny in the sense that it absorbs enough energy to thwart of bad vibes, but it's also rigid enough to fight off conflicting changes in motion ...
However, if the other attaching pieces are rubber it loads the bearing in the tailshaft with a little more force ... nothing dramatic though.

I run poly at the engine, tranny (w/ X) and control arms ... at first they feel stiff, but they break in nicely, and like said above: your shifter won't dance around. It's much nicer when the drivetrain feels attached to the chassis
 

95COBRA241

New Member
Sep 3, 2005
339
0
0
Delray Beach, FL
Nov 16, 2005
#11
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #11
I guess I am the one guy that voted for the rubber tranny mount. I am not sure about the tranny I was thinking more of the motors mounts. I did a seach as I was wondering which to use when i drop in the 347. From what I've read ppl are saying there is more vibration with the poly's than the rubber which is weird 'cause I thought that's what the poly's were supposed do...stop vibration better than the rubber
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 16, 2005
#12
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #12
Funny screen name

I use urethane x member bushings, trans bushing and motor mounts. No issues what so ever except the motor mounts I have raise the engine a tad which I didn't know.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Nov 16, 2005
#13
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #13
95COBRA241 said:
I guess I am the one guy that voted for the rubber tranny mount. I am not sure about the tranny I was thinking more of the motors mounts. I did a seach as I was wondering which to use when i drop in the 347. From what I've read ppl are saying there is more vibration with the poly's than the rubber which is weird 'cause I thought that's what the poly's were supposed do...stop vibration better than the rubber
Click to expand...
The poly has a greater durometer rating, which means that a byproduct is that it transmits more vibration to the chassis (the next step, solid mounts, does this even more-so). Rubber is soft and pliable so it absorbs more vibrations, but that quality (its softness) also means that it also allows more flex and does not 'anchor' the motor as well, which results in a slight drop in HP to the RW over a more rigid mount).

For folks considering rubber mounts, the mounts for a '93 (which are captured vert mounts) are the way to go IMHO.
 

Woodrow

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
183
0
0
Atlanta/Auburn
Nov 16, 2005
#14
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #14
Grn92LX said:
Funny screen name
Click to expand...
:Word:

Sorry for the hi-jack but what were you thinking when you registered that name?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 16, 2005
#15
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #15
vikingpower said:
What is this, kindergarten? Who cares what his name is, we're all adults
Click to expand...

Nope, preschool.

I have seen users get banned because of their names. It was just a warning, not a negative comment sir. I mean "dada" (keeping with the preschool theme).
 
D

dirty slut

New Member
Nov 12, 2005
59
0
0
Nov 16, 2005
#16
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #16
Ok, guess im ordering the Urethane's. Thanks all!!

btw- dirty was the first thing that popped in my head when it asked me for a S/N so I put it
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Nov 16, 2005
#17
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #17
I've been through a bunch of rubber mounts, get the energy suspension urethane and be done with it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
704
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
638
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
Forced Induction Total Timing under boost
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
312
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2025
Dontknowchit
Tightening upper control arm bushings at ride height dilemma… need some help
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Dec 27, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
51
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?