• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Vacuum issues....

  • Thread starter Thread starter restomod22
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2005
R

restomod22

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
87
0
0
Cincinnati, Oh
Apr 11, 2005
#1
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #1
I've been having vacuum issues since my rebuild. I cannot find any leaks in the seals of the intake or carb. I hook a vacuum gauge up the the intake (port where old C4 tranny connected) and while at idle the gauge reads around 15. When I hit the gas, the gauge jumps up. Is it possible that my pathetic little Edelbrock Performer intake can't handle the demands of my set up? I recently replaced my short block with a remfg'd 302 bored .30 over, added the AFR heads, cam, and other mods listed below. 9.5 to 1 compression. I will be replacing my carb/intake soon, but would like to solve this problem first. I'm really stabbing in the dark here, but am at a total loss. Could improper roller rocker adjustments affect the vacuum? Say if the valves weren't closing properly due to overtightened rockers?

Thanks for any help!
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Apr 11, 2005
#2
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #2
what issue(s) is this vacuum problem causing?
 
R

restomod22

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
87
0
0
Cincinnati, Oh
Apr 11, 2005
#3
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #3
6Stang7 said:
what issue(s) is this vacuum problem causing?
Click to expand...

Well, it's hard to say. The car is running OK. I know I have a carb problem, which is giving me some grief, but nothing I can attribute to the vacuum issues. I only have about 200 miles on my rebuild, so I haven't really run her hard yet. So far the throttle response is good and other than some carb issues, it seems to be OK. I just know that I shouldn't have this problem.
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Apr 11, 2005
#4
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #4
hmmm. well, it sounds like you really dont have a vacuum issue then if you are not having anything actting up and not work correctly. you might just be under-carbed. o, and not to get off topic here, but you can go ahead and run the hell out of your motor. the 500 break-in is worthless from the tech articles i have read. the cylinder wall hone is like a file to your piston rings, so if you run your motor hard, you get better seating. my old boos when i worked in a shop built up a 347 race motor, and once we finished it we filled it with moblie1 synthetic oil, broken in the cam, then did a fat burn out and ran the piss outta the engine. has yet to have a single problem.

but, take it as you want it. some people are uncomfortable with doing this, which is understandable.
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
Apr 11, 2005
#5
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #5
im not, i have 20 miles on my rebuild and ive already beat the sh&* out of it.. kind of... i will wait to put synthetic in it until the first oil change at around 500 miles
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Apr 11, 2005
#6
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #6
ya, the whole synthentic oil on the break in is still a big debate. i can understand how regular oil would let the rings wear better, but i dont see synthetic preventing the rings from seating.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Apr 11, 2005
#7
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #7
Even some of the synthetic mfgs. suggest bearking in on dino.

The only time you sould see vacuum increase when cracking the throttle is when you are hooked to a ported source. Valve, carb and ignition adjustments can all effect vacuum readings. 15" is pretty good, really.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Apr 11, 2005
#8
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #8
I will be breaking in my engine by running it hard. You shouldn't run synthetic oil for the break in. The oil is a lot thinner and lubes a lot more. Making the walls a lot more slippery hence making the rings not seat as well. Dino will not lube as well allowing the rings to file better and seat.
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
Apr 11, 2005
#9
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #9
Max Power said:
Even some of the synthetic mfgs. suggest bearking in on dino.

The only time you sould see vacuum increase when cracking the throttle is when you are hooked to a ported source. Valve, carb and ignition adjustments can all effect vacuum readings. 15" is pretty good, really.
Click to expand...
I was also gonna mention that. shouldnt the vacuum level decrease when you rev the motor, not increase. well at least under load i know it would decrease and eventually be 0, right???
 
R

restomod22

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
87
0
0
Cincinnati, Oh
Apr 11, 2005
#10
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #10
Thanks everyone.

I'm not using synthetic oil for the first 500 miles or so. I have read about breaking in engines with high RMP's to help seat the rings. I've driven the car somewhat aggressively but have yet to get on her. The carb isn't tuned that well or just plain not working effectively. This is my first build and I guess I'm just nervous

Max Power, when you say ported source, the connection I'm using for the gauge would apply? So 15 at idle is normal and vacuum increasing with throttle is OK? I always thought the needle would drop to 0 with acceleration...

Will switching to a larger cfm carb help?
 

Blown4.6

Founding Member
Aug 19, 2002
351
0
0
Orlando, FL
Apr 11, 2005
#11
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #11
restomod22 said:
Thanks everyone.

I'm not using synthetic oil for the first 500 miles or so. I have read about breaking in engines with high RMP's to help seat the rings. I've driven the car somewhat aggressively but have yet to get on her. The carb isn't tuned that well or just plain not working effectively. This is my first build and I guess I'm just nervous

Max Power, when you say ported source, the connection I'm using for the gauge would apply? So 15 at idle is normal and vacuum increasing with throttle is OK? I always thought the needle would drop to 0 with acceleration...

Will switching to a larger cfm carb help?
Click to expand...


15 inches at idle is okay. Depending on the cam and compression ratio, maybe 17 is a little better; but, I would not have an issue with 15. When you rev the engine, it should go up to 25 inches or more. At WOT under load, that's when you see big drop off in vacuum.
 
R

restomod22

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
87
0
0
Cincinnati, Oh
Apr 11, 2005
#12
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #12
Blown4.6 said:
15 inches at idle is okay. Depending on the cam and compression ratio, maybe 17 is a little better; but, I would not have an issue with 15. When you rev the engine, it should go up to 25 inches or more. At WOT under load, that's when you see big drop off in vacuum.
Click to expand...

WOT?
 

Blown4.6

Founding Member
Aug 19, 2002
351
0
0
Orlando, FL
Apr 11, 2005
#13
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #13
restomod22 said:
WOT?
Click to expand...

Wide Open Throttle= WOT
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Apr 12, 2005
#14
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #14
Manifold vacuum should give you a baseline reading at idle. When opening the throttle, it may increase a little if the throttle is opened gently, but it will usually drop a little. WOT should get you close to zero. Under load, it will almost always drop, regardless of the rate of throttle opening.

Ported vacuum should read zero at idle, rise immediately when opening the throttle, and gradually drop off as rpms and load increase. Ported vacuum almost always comes from a fitting on the carb. About the only thing ported vacuum is used for is the vacuum advance on your distributor.
 

ozstang65

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
313
0
0
Queensland, Australia
Apr 13, 2005
#15
  • Apr 13, 2005
  • #15
restomod22 said:
...I have read about breaking in engines with high RMP's to help seat the rings. I've driven the car somewhat aggressively but have yet to get on her.....
Click to expand...

It's not high revs that get the job done, its high load. High revs should be avoided initially. Get the tuning done quickly, then hammer it. You only get one go at the run-in, do it before it's too late.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Edelbrock 1405 Setup
  • nathantaylor200
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
190
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
nathantaylor200
N
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Vacuum line question?
  • Mustang Momma
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
135
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
D
Engine 85 GT Backfires through Carb
  • DienstXIV
  • Oct 3, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
576
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 7, 2025
85GTStangGuy
H
Engine 1987 5.0 HO vacuum hose locations
  • harryhaber
  • Jun 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
467
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 21, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?