• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Valve Cover Clearances

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustang5L5
  • Start date Start date Dec 29, 2017
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,196
17,889
224
Massachusetts
Dec 29, 2017
#1
  • Dec 29, 2017
  • #1
I'm torn between two sets of valve covers, and trying to understand if i'll have any clearance issues with my setup (TFS170's w/Crane Gold 1.6's).

I like the set of TFS black covers, and I am going to assume these will clear. Increased height is a concern for me as I'm running a 3/8" spacer with my cobra intake, but can't go much more without needing a hood.

TFS-51411801 valve covers
TFS-51400800 oil fill neck

But I've always liked these too. Description says these are taller, so I assume they will clear as well

M-6000-E302

Any direct experience or opinions on one over the other? Cost is about the same considering I need to buy the oil fill neck for the TFS covers and install it. Like I said before, I'm already running a 3/8" spacer on my Cobra intake, so they should be enough clearance I assume?
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Dec 29, 2017
#2
  • Dec 29, 2017
  • #2
No experience with those particular valve covers but figured I'd throw my 2 cents in....maybe it will help.
I run stock valve covers w/baffles removed, no intake spacer, 1.6 Crane gold rollers on RHS200 heads
and have no clearance issues.
 

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
Dec 29, 2017
#3
  • Dec 29, 2017
  • #3
I know the tfs covers will clear, but you will need to drill for the oil fill/vent and there's no baffle.

Frpp ones (the short/efi-labeled ones) may need a little clearancing on the baffles but otherwise should work fine.

The tf heads do have the cover rail raised 1/4" or so above stock so that will help. May need to trim/fiddle with the throttle bracket as well depending on egr/tb spacer setup.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,196
17,889
224
Massachusetts
Dec 29, 2017
#4
  • Dec 29, 2017
  • #4
I knew i'd need to mess with the throttle cable bracket. I have access to a laser cutter and brake so i could just cut/bend myself up a custom setup if needed. Concerned more with clearance on the covers with the cobra intake plenum w/ 3/8" spacer.

Between the two covers, it's really more of personal preference. I actually planned on coating the cobra upper in black as well, so just trying to think which one supplements the look i am going for.

How difficult is installing the oil fill on the TFS heads? Does it need to be located in a specific spot to clear the rockers, or just drill where i please (within reason)
 

Dan02gt

mazing how much gas smell came from that tiny hole
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
909
415
113
Greenville, NC
Dec 29, 2017
#5
  • Dec 29, 2017
  • #5
I currently run the Ford Racing ones with a Cobra intake and no intake spacer. You do have to enlarge the mounting holes in the TB bracket about 1/8" to clear but that's it. With a intake spacer you shouldn't even need to do that.

I would like to know what rockers will clear too. I have used the Ford Racing ones with the old Steeda 1.7 adjustable pedestal style rockers before and they clear after working on the oil baffle, but I have no clue if a stud mount rocker will clear or not.
 

eighty5fox

Mustang Master
Sep 29, 2016
286
303
83
mass
Dec 29, 2017
#6
  • Dec 29, 2017
  • #6
Not sure if you are set on those 2 sets. But i have a set from my car that are brand new ive mounted on motor and only ran the car never drove. They are holley/ mr gasket baffled valve covers. The finish is black and looks awesome im starting to strip my car and sell everything to start the coyote swap.They clear my systemax with no issues and also my 1.6 comp roller rockers. If your interested let me know ill give you a great deal im located in new bedford ma.

https://www.holley.com/products/accessories/valve_covers/small_block_ford_valve_covers/parts/6846BG
 
Reactions: Mustang5L5

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,196
17,889
224
Massachusetts
Dec 30, 2017
#7
  • Dec 30, 2017
  • #7
Hmm. I'll let you know. I was set on the looks of those two sets but I didn't know those existed. Let me think about which one I want to go with a bit.
 

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,734
3,178
203
Taylorsville ky
Dec 30, 2017
#8
  • Dec 30, 2017
  • #8
eighty5fox said:
Not sure if you are set on those 2 sets. But i have a set from my car that are brand new ive mounted on motor and only ran the car never drove. They are holley/ mr gasket baffled valve covers. The finish is black and looks awesome im starting to strip my car and sell everything to start the coyote swap.They clear my systemax with no issues and also my 1.6 comp roller rockers. If your interested let me know ill give you a great deal im located in new bedford ma.

https://www.holley.com/products/accessories/valve_covers/small_block_ford_valve_covers/parts/6846BG
Click to expand...
Those are good looking valve covers
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,481
8,677
234
S.I.NY
Dec 30, 2017
#9
  • Dec 30, 2017
  • #9
I run the FRPPs you put up with 1.6 Harland sharps on my TFS 170s . No issue

 
Reactions: Chuckman

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,933
21,110
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 30, 2017
#10
  • Dec 30, 2017
  • #10
I vote that these covers are Mustang:



I've seen these painted many colors and they look damned nice.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Dec 30, 2017
#11
  • Dec 30, 2017
  • #11
Mike, they also sell douoble thick valve cover gaskets to help with clearance.
 
Reactions: 94tang, RaggedGT and Mustang5L5

Jersey Joe

I remember blowing that Monkey's ass
10 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
760
1,280
154
Bloomingdale N.j.
Dec 30, 2017
#12
  • Dec 30, 2017
  • #12
Oil fill hole is not so bad, i drilled it between the intake and exhaust rocker and haven't had a issue with sucking oil.
 
Reactions: Bird76Mojo
N

Nickl223

New Member
Jul 6, 2021
4
0
1
Mass
Feb 12, 2022
#13
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #13
TOOLOW91 said:
I run the FRPPs you put up with 1.6 Harland sharps on my TFS 170s . No issue

Click to expand...
Do you have a stock hood or Are you running a spacer on the intake ?
 

derek1993

Active Member
Sep 13, 2020
162
79
38
Thompson's Station, TN
Feb 12, 2022
#14
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #14
Nickl223 said:
Do you have a stock hood or Are you running a spacer on the intake ?
Click to expand...
5 yr old thread??
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,856
10,533
203
polk county florida
Feb 13, 2022
#15
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #15
derek1993 said:
5 yr old thread??
Click to expand...
I've seen worse, sometimes, well, most times the OP does not post the resolution, they come here looking remedies and solutions mostly from a Google fu search, if lucky the member is still here and can answer, sadly mostly one hit wonders that found they left a wire off or used the wrong part and don't want to admit their problem was self inflicted.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,196
17,889
224
Massachusetts
Feb 13, 2022
#16
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #16
Damn. I forgot I made this thread.


What I ended up doing was the Ford Racing valve covers. I had to remove the internal oil fill baffles and grind down the casting bosses on the inside to clear my Crane Gold 1.6 rockers.

For the intake, I needed a 3/8” spacer to allow the throttle bracket and the drivers side PCV fitting to clear

Should clear the stock hood. I say that because I have run the 3/8” spacer and this intake and it cleared fine. The only major change however is that I went from worn 1988 engine mounts to new energy suspension poly mounts. About to confirm if the stock hood still clears
 
Reactions: Nickl223

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Feb 13, 2022
#17
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #17
Mustang5L5 said:
Damn. I forgot I made this thread.


What I ended up doing was the Ford Racing valve covers. I had to remove the internal oil fill baffles and grind down the casting bosses on the inside to clear my Crane Gold 1.6 rockers.

For the intake, I needed a 3/8” spacer to allow the throttle bracket and the drivers side PCV fitting to clear

Should clear the stock hood. I say that because I have run the 3/8” spacer and this intake and it cleared fine. The only major change however is that I went from worn 1988 engine mounts to new energy suspension poly mounts. About to confirm if the stock hood still clears
Click to expand...
Glad you are still around to follow it up. Those covers look good, but it sounds like a PITA install.
 

02 281 GT

Agreed...My wife has great Boobs
15 Year Member
Feb 3, 2009
3,208
1,972
194
Cabot, AR
Feb 13, 2022
#18
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #18
You would think that Ford would have modified those valve covers at some point so that they would clear roller rockers.
 
Reactions: Nickl223

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,196
17,889
224
Massachusetts
Feb 13, 2022
#19
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #19
02 281 GT said:
You would think that Ford would have modified those valve covers at some point so that they would clear roller rockers.
Click to expand...

They clear some. For my stud-mounts the interference wasn’t on the rockers themselves, but clearing the actual tops of the studs. It’s was only 1 or 2 that actually made contact.

Pedestal mounts might be perfectly fine.

 
Reactions: Nickl223, 02 281 GT and 7991LXnSHO

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,196
17,889
224
Massachusetts
Feb 13, 2022
#20
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #20
Here’s what hit. The boss along the center line was contacting. Like said, only 2 actually hit but I took my grinder and took down more than needed just to be sure. After grinding, need to really clean the shavings out.




With a 3/8” intake spacer, here’s my clearance.

If i slotted the throttle bracket, and eliminated the PCV connection under the plenum, probably could have gotten away with no spacer.


 
Reactions: BoostedRed89gt, Nickl223 and General karthief
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Leaking top of intake
  • Bertan
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
301
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2026
manicmechanic007
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
153
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
713
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
527
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
94-95 Cobra Intake
  • Va89Stang
  • Jul 15, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
824
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 29, 2024
rednotch
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?