• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Variant of the 2005 Mustang to be unveiled?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheOgre
  • Start date Start date Jan 30, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
T

TheOgre

New Member
Jan 30, 2004
1
0
0
Jan 30, 2004
#1
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #1
First post here.

I looked through the threads but didn't see any existing threads mentioning this. Have you guys seen this? Its about a new variant of the 2005 Mustang being unveiled at the Chicago Auto Show.

http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/shows/chicago04/index.htm

What do you guys think?
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
49
Maryland
Jan 30, 2004
#2
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #2
I'm eagerly awaiting that one. I'm bettin on a vert though.
 

vyto2

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
245
0
0
Jan 30, 2004
#3
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #3
Shelby! Please!
 

GelatiCruiser

Founding Member
Jun 7, 2002
1,054
0
0
49
1 Mile South of Somewhere.
Jan 30, 2004
#4
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #4
Shelby Shelby ShelbyShelby.....p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeassssseee?!?!?!?1
 
O

Omegalock

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
616
0
0
Jan 30, 2004
#5
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #5
Yeah I was reading about this on BON. Seems like half the folks think it'll be a Vert a quarter thing it'll be an LX cheapy V8 and the rest are hoping from the range of Shelby,Mach or Boss. Personally after circling this on my proverbial calendar I'd feel like I've been kicked in the nuts if it turns out to be the vert(which I do think will be likely).
 

PonyGrl420

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
450
0
16
43
SC
Jan 30, 2004
#6
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #6
Id love a shelby, or somthing along the lines of a lx v8. I have a feeling its going to be a vert though.
 
S

shatner saves

New Member
Jan 13, 2004
583
0
0
Jan 30, 2004
#7
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #7
Vert. I agree, a shelby or SVT car would be nice but a vert just makes sense. Intro Coupe, convertable, special edition, special edition convertable, etc, in that order.

As far as the return of the LX V8, forget it. Remember the corvette Z06? Initially, that car was supposed to be a stripper performace version of the regular vette. (i.e., cloth seats, conventional (non-adjustable) suspension, optional air conditioning, etc). GM realized that they couldn't built the standard vette fast enough to supply demand, so why in the world would they build a car with less content *and* sticker it for less money? I imagine the same situation with the mustang, at least for the first year or two.
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Jan 30, 2004
#8
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #8
id love to see a shelby also

but i think thats also a good idea..
 
S

Sir Hacksalot

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2001
363
0
0
54
Ankeny, IA
Jan 30, 2004
#9
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #9
TheOgre said:
First post here.

I looked through the threads but didn't see any existing threads mentioning this. Have you guys seen this? Its about a new variant of the 2005 Mustang being unveiled at the Chicago Auto Show.

http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/shows/chicago04/index.htm

What do you guys think?
Click to expand...

I am betting a convertible, but would sign up REAL QUICK if it were a stripped down LX type car that came in about 3300 lbs, and $25K or less.

Sir Hacksalot
 

PimpDaddyGT

Founding Member
Jul 3, 2002
270
0
0
52
Everett, WA
Jan 30, 2004
#10
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #10
I agree that it will most likely be the Convertible. It's at least a verified model for 2005. I am eagerly awaiting. I will most likely get a 'Vert in '06 if the SVT is out of the $35K range and there are no Special Editions yet.

Eric
 

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
www.cardomain.com
Jan 30, 2004
#11
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #11
I want a LX vert.
 

RodStang

Founding Member
Mar 24, 2000
1,862
0
36
53
Chicago?
Jan 30, 2004
#12
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #12
shatner saves said:
Vert. I agree, a shelby or SVT car would be nice but a vert just makes sense. Intro Coupe, convertable, special edition, special edition convertable, etc, in that order.

As far as the return of the LX V8, forget it. Remember the corvette Z06? Initially, that car was supposed to be a stripper performace version of the regular vette. (i.e., cloth seats, conventional (non-adjustable) suspension, optional air conditioning, etc). GM realized that they couldn't built the standard vette fast enough to supply demand, so why in the world would they build a car with less content *and* sticker it for less money? I imagine the same situation with the mustang, at least for the first year or two.
Click to expand...

Yup. I also read that their market research showed that no one who was going to spend $38K on a car was going to want it stripped. If Ford thought it was a good idea to have an LX type car, they would still be selling the GTS/248A. If people are willing to pay for the full GT, Ford might as well make a little extra money on the options.
 

numenor27

New Member
Jan 3, 2004
252
0
0
37
Chicago, IL
Jan 31, 2004
#13
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #13
TheOgre said:
First post here.

I looked through the threads but didn't see any existing threads mentioning this. Have you guys seen this? Its about a new variant of the 2005 Mustang being unveiled at the Chicago Auto Show.

http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/shows/chicago04/index.htm

What do you guys think?
Click to expand...


I dont really care what it is, Im just glad ill be able to see it at the Chicago auto show.
 

USAF-Sergeant

New Member
Jan 29, 2004
43
0
0
Charleston, SC
Jan 31, 2004
#14
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #14
Please excuse the ignorant question, but my knowledge of mustangs is lacking. I am tyring to bring myself up to date on the lastest and greatest as this '05 design has me drooling. I think about the day that I open my garage door and there she is, staring at me begging to be let out to run.

My question is what is a vert? To follow that, how does it differ from the LX and such. Again, sorry for sounding like a dumbass but one has to start learning somewhere. Class is in session.

Thanks
 

SR97GT66

New Member
Jan 19, 2003
281
0
0
43
Long Island, NY
www.geocities.com
Jan 31, 2004
#15
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #15
USAF-Sergeant said:
Please excuse the ignorant question, but my knowledge of mustangs is lacking. I am tyring to bring myself up to date on the lastest and greatest as this '05 design has me drooling. I think about the day that I open my garage door and there she is, staring at me begging to be let out to run.

My question is what is a vert? To follow that, how does it differ from the LX and such. Again, sorry for sounding like a dumbass but one has to start learning somewhere. Class is in session.

Thanks
Click to expand...
Don't feel stupid like you said you've got to start somewhere. When they say vert they mean convertible(retractable top). As far as a LX, and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it would basically be a GT without the options such as fog lamps, leather seating, power windows, but it would still have a V8 engine.
-Scott
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
52
Portland, Oregon
Jan 31, 2004
#16
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #16
SR97GT66 said:
As far as a LX, and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it would basically be a GT without the options such as fog lamps, leather seating, power windows, but it would still have a V8 engine.
Click to expand...
Depends on how you define LX, different years meant different options. In the Fox body days, LX could mean 4 cylinder or 8 cylinder. In the current discussion, as it relates to 2005, I think people would like LX to mean V6 body, options, interior, etc, and a V8 drivetrain.



Dave
 
M

MustangvertGT

Founding Member
Jul 17, 2002
122
0
0
41
Montebello, Cali
Jan 31, 2004
#17
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #17
USAF-Sergeant said:
My question is what is a vert?
Thanks
Click to expand...
We're too lazy to say convertible, so we say Vert, lol.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
41
Granada Hills, California
Jan 31, 2004
#18
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #18
USAF- In the fox bodies, the 5.0 LXs were greatly respected because it was in a light, no options 4 cylinder body with the 5.0 GT drivetrain. Basically a GT without several hundred pounds of junk, meaning they were rediculously fast. From what I've heard, a few of them hit 13s stock. Which was really, really fast for a N/A car in the 80s.

So people are hoping that a similar car will happen with the new car... IE a light v6 car with no extra weight with a V8 skin. But it won't happen unless Ford only drops the price a few grand off the GT so they are making the same amount of profit on both a GT and an LX.
 
J

JJZ109

New Member
Jan 27, 2004
19
0
0
Feb 1, 2004
#19
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #19
Sad, what you're describing is what a Mustang should be, IMHO. If only Ford would just give us the option. A lighter V8 version is what I'd prefer but I'll be surprised if this is the variant to be shown at Chicago. I expect initial demand for the '05 Mustang to be high so there probably isn't a lot of incentive for Ford to offer a V8 version without a lot of profit increasing add-ons. You want a V8? Fine, you can buy the GT and all the stuff that comes with it, whether you want it or not. That's my guess as to what the Ford beancounters are thinking.

The foglights would be first on my list of things to delete from another V8 version. I prefer a cleaner looking 'Stang. Just my preference. And do you really need power windows and locks for a two door car?
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
52
Portland, Oregon
Feb 1, 2004
#20
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #20
Ford will make whatever people will buy in enough quantity to justify the production. If there are only 500 people willing to pay for a stripped down V8, then I would be very surprised to see them produce it. They are a business, pure and simple, and they will focus their effors on what will sell best (as any good business does).

Dave
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
87
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
R
Progress Thread A small update on our first-gen Mustang project
  • Restomotive
  • Apr 24, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
100
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 24, 2026
Restomotive
R
Who the hell puts the wrong spark plugs in a 3.8L?
  • snowstang
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
446
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
LILCBRA
Eastern North Carolina Autocross Events!
  • Warhorse Racing
  • Feb 23, 2026
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Replies
0
Views
366
Regional Forums and Event Information Feb 23, 2026
Warhorse Racing
S
Cali Members, Get in Here! - Smog issue with possible error on 2007 Shelby GT Emissions label failed due to EGR
  • saldua
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 1, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?