• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

VERY VERY MAD!!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter ProKiller
  • Start date Start date Aug 22, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Aug 22, 2004
#1
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #1
so first off i haven't been around for a while and i come back and see that oink finally got his all done and dyno'd with insane #s and i take it RC is no longer lost the love. i didn't realize i wasn't around for that long. but back to the point at hand....

yeah so i'm really pissed off. when i got this car, the guy told me he had it dyno'd at 460 RWHP and 425 RWTQ. yeah i got it dyno'd finally and it put out 390 RWHP and 360 RWTQ. granted it was humid but not humid enough to loose 70 hp. so i'm pretty pissed off that the guy lied to me. and i'm pretty pissed off that its not over 400. the air/fuel was right around 10, which is fine with me b/c of the 120k miles on the stock block.

i guess now its saving up for the 331 short block again.... but i tell u what am i pissed off.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Aug 22, 2004
#2
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #2
O.k it's not what you were told but 390 RWHP and 360 RWTQ is nothing to be mad at. Hell I would be happy with just 300rwhp.
 
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Aug 22, 2004
#3
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #3
Was it the same kind of dyno? The difference between a dynojet and mustang dyno can easily account for that. Were his numbers corrected? Were yours? There's lots of reasons other than dishonesty to explain the difference.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Aug 22, 2004
#4
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #4
Your numbers are almost dead-on 85% of what he told you. Are you positive he wasn't quoting estimated brake horsepower numbers instead?

Dave
 

Nik_95Cobra

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,677
1
37
Tempe, Arizona
Aug 22, 2004
#5
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #5
Or maybe the tuning's off a bit from when the last guy had it strapped down.
 

Sleepy McNastee

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
491
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Aug 22, 2004
#6
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #6
Yeah, that does sound like it could have been what the engine was making at the flywheel, not the wheels.

How much boost are you running? Maybe your belt is slipping now, and the previous owner did a dyno run when it was 50 degrees out. Or someting like that, you know.

I would't be too mad, but I definitely understand how the miscommunication could piss you off. Like asked before was that a mustang dyno or dyno jet or what?
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Aug 22, 2004
#7
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #7
Yeah, I was going to say, how much boost are you running. If it's at 6psi or something, then it makes complete sense.

Also, 10:1 a/f ratio is really rich, even for a boosted car. Ask around, but I think it should be around 11.5-12.0:1.
Scott
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Aug 22, 2004
#8
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #8
You didn't mention boost. I agree it should make 425+ with your mods and 10-11psi. Weather also plays a huge role. Also did you have it tuned or just do one run and that's it.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 22, 2004
#9
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #9
i'd be pissed too if i bought a car thinking it put down 460 hp and then find out it only puts down 390.

on the other hand, i'd be really happy to cave a car that puts down 390. i'm sure i'm not even close to 300 yet.
 

OinkAodeOink

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
3,026
1
0
Daytona bch, Florida
Aug 22, 2004
#10
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #10
yea, anything in the 10's on your a/f is rich.. that would play a large role in loosing power. Even at 11.2-11.5 your still safe. How was the timing? good gas i suppose? Was the 460 claimed run done on race gas with more timing advance?

No doubt your combo listed should make 450+ to the wheels on 12-14psi 10psi i would guess 425
 

SmithCobra95

New Member
Aug 21, 2004
219
0
0
Sacramento, California
Aug 22, 2004
#11
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #11
damn 390.....i wish i had that hp...but that sucks if he lied to you. make sure that his dyno wasnt at the flywheel and ur was at the wheels.
 

AznStanger3v

Active Member
Aug 11, 2003
2,026
0
47
Northern VA
Aug 23, 2004
#12
  • Aug 23, 2004
  • #12
mustve been a miscommunication. i did the math and 460 - 15% = 391 to the whizeels dawg!
 

984.6gt

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
2,806
0
46
Sugar Land
Aug 23, 2004
#13
  • Aug 23, 2004
  • #13
You have alot of power left in your A/F alone. Your car is pig rich.
 

onesticker

New Member
Feb 19, 2003
222
0
0
Jacksonville,FL
Aug 23, 2004
#14
  • Aug 23, 2004
  • #14
Yes, I agree. Rich, Rich, Rich! Change your air/fuel and you should see some better numbers. 390 is nothing to be ashamed of though. You still have a car that will run the high 11's low 12's.
 

Brads Coupe

Sweeeeet!!!
Founding Member
Apr 18, 2000
2,838
0
0
Calgary , Alberta, Canada
Aug 23, 2004
#15
  • Aug 23, 2004
  • #15
I would make sure you are dynoing the car on the same kind of dyno. Maybe you dynoed it on a Mustang Dyno and he dynoed it on a Dynojet. So many variables.
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
Glenview,Il
Aug 23, 2004
#16
  • Aug 23, 2004
  • #16
As everyone said Dyno differences, possible race gas and timing advance, and your way to rich. If you can get a hold of the guy again, try and get the specifics from him. 460 sounds a bit high but still reasonable, but again theres so many variables. When he told you this WHY DIDN'T YOU ASK FOR A DYNO SHEET???!!! Just try and get a hold of the guy, and change that A/F ratio and you should be over 400rwhp easily.
 

94TURBO5 O

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
2,509
0
0
VA
Aug 23, 2004
#17
  • Aug 23, 2004
  • #17
Your car has to make more than mine. You have H/C/I over me and more if you have LT's. I made the #'s in my sig with stock E7's, GT cam, and Cobra intake w/o the cooler. I'm am expecting at least another 25-30 with the tune on the methanol kit on 12 psi. You need to look at the psi you are putting out. My car made 342/378 on a 5 psi tune.
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Aug 23, 2004
#18
  • Aug 23, 2004
  • #18
if you factor in a loss of 15% to the wheels and subtract that from 460 you get 391...so he could have been stating flywheel numbers, and if thats the case your DEAD on......
 

yellow5.0cobra

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2002
2,849
0
0
In the garage, On the floor.
Aug 23, 2004
#19
  • Aug 23, 2004
  • #19
you sure the s/c belt was not slipping like a mo-fo?

it might need some TLC and re-tightening, or a new belt.

wear and tear items tend to be the first guess for problems.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Aug 23, 2004
#20
  • Aug 23, 2004
  • #20
okay.
1. i miss quoted the sheet. the air/fuel is right at 11.5. i was thinking off the top of my head and didn't think to double check.

2. i'm running about 8 lbs. of boost. i dont' really want to up it at this point. i just don't want to put too much boost through the stock bottom end with the miles that it has. just hit 122k the other day.

3. its in the same trim that it was always in. never had race gas, never changed the timing. i don't think the guy even owned a timing light.

4. didn't have it tuned when it was there. it was at a car show and they weren't tuning.

5. i didn't want them to tune it anyway. it was originally tuned by LaRocca in Jersey, and i know hes good and knows what he's doing, where as these guys.....

6. I did ask the guy for a dyno sheet from the 460 claim, but he couldn't find it. i was surprised he found half the stuff i did get, paperwise, not to organized.

7. true, i am glad to have 390 but still it pisses me off that its 70 under his claim.

8. i did make sure with the guy that he was saying rear wheel horsepower when he told me 460, but who knows...

i think thats everything.....
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Speedometer and shifting issues
  • wyatt-tetro891
  • Aug 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
169
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 18, 2026
wyatt-tetro891
W
Who the hell puts the wrong spark plugs in a 3.8L?
  • snowstang
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
490
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
LILCBRA
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
122
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
270
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?