• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Vortec VS Kenne Bell ???

  • Thread starter Thread starter balderman
  • Start date Start date May 7, 2004

balderman

New Member
Dec 6, 2002
563
0
0
Spring City, PA
May 7, 2004
#1
  • May 7, 2004
  • #1
I am just curious if there is a difference in quality between Vortec S-Trim and the Kenne Bell Blowzilla..

I know the vortec is cyntrifical and the kenne bell is screw.. is there a benefit to having either one?
 

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
May 7, 2004
#2
  • May 7, 2004
  • #2
With the KB you can't run as much boost without doing some extra steps. I think anything above 7lbs and your supposed to get an intercooler or like water/meth injection.

On the otherhand your going to get full boost out of a KB at really low rpms as with a vortech you climb somewhat gradually. This is kinda nice on gas milage though, Because you can drive it around normally and then when you put your foot into it will be there.

IF i could do it all over again i would probably go with a KB because of the simple fact that it looks cool and everybody has a vortech.

Oh and i think with a KB your going to have a lot more traction problems then with a Vortech.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 7, 2004
#3
  • May 7, 2004
  • #3
dont limit yourself to just vortech and KB.....Paxtons are awesome blowers as well.
 

mstangfrk95GTS!

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
203
0
0
May 7, 2004
#4
  • May 7, 2004
  • #4
id love to strap a kenne bell onto a 96-01 cobra, that way your not lacking the low end.

it seems to me that the 5.0 needs help on top end while the 4.6 needs low end especially the DOHC.

so a rule of thumb is cen. on a 5.0, KB on a 4.6.

not a hard and fast rule but thats they way it goes the way ive seen it.

id out a KB on a stockish 5.0 tho.

BIG BLOCK FEEL BABY!!!
 
5

5literstang

New Member
Apr 15, 2003
1,374
0
0
Clark, NJ
May 7, 2004
#5
  • May 7, 2004
  • #5
what about procharger? i hear there superchargers are awesome!
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 7, 2004
#6
  • May 7, 2004
  • #6
5literstang said:
what about procharger? i hear there superchargers are awesome!
Click to expand...


when the head units arent leaking.....actually I shouldent say that b/c the have " apparently" fixed them but I have still read threads on them leaking on 4.6's
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
May 7, 2004
#7
  • May 7, 2004
  • #7
Id go with the KB. In the Mustangs Monthy mag this month, there is a KB 347 sn95 in there. I think its pumping out somewhere in the 530-540 range with eqaul tq. It doesn't get anymore like a bigblock than that. Id be putting my 2.73's back in with that kind of power.
 

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
May 7, 2004
#8
  • May 7, 2004
  • #8
The KB will reach full boost at a much lower rpm, meaning more power down low.
The Vortec takes rpms to reach bull boost, meaning more power in the upper rpm.
One the street, if you can get traction the KB will most likely win. On the track the Vortec will most likely win. This is a generalzation.
 

BlueDevil95

New Member
Apr 20, 2004
184
0
0
Elkton, MD.
May 7, 2004
#9
  • May 7, 2004
  • #9
hov much low end do you really need? screw type blowers are kind of pointless on a 5.0, you'll never hook up without some serious suspension. i'd do a centrifugal blower, vortech or paxton are my personaly faves.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
May 7, 2004
#10
  • May 7, 2004
  • #10
I dont understand why everyone says the cent's give so much more top end. Its not like a screw type isnt making boost at high RPMS. I dunno if u guys have seen any of these 03 cobras with kenne bell vids, but they make 15+psi all the way to 6,500rpm.
 

BlueDevil95

New Member
Apr 20, 2004
184
0
0
Elkton, MD.
May 7, 2004
#11
  • May 7, 2004
  • #11
the real difference is that the screw blowers are instant, steady boost to a certain point. the cent's make more boost as rpm rises, also to a point, but that point is higher than with the screw.
 
M

martin1

New Member
May 5, 2004
22
0
0
May 7, 2004
#12
  • May 7, 2004
  • #12
the screw type's only downfall as far as I've experienced is the heat produced in high boost applications. so sometimes an intecooler is needed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Kenne Bell Supporting Mods for 2002 GT?
  • Rembrant
  • Mar 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
711
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 25, 2025
Noobz347
T
Fuel supercharged 5.0 kenne bell 2.1l
  • tazman1963
  • May 18, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 19, 2024
tazman1963
T
Thanks for having me
  • Gibson17
  • Jan 12, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
251
The Welcome Wagon Jan 14, 2025
gkomo
G
Supercharger Options 5.4 32V Intech
  • Germangazguzzler
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Other Auto Tech Apr 23, 2025
RaggedGT
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
385
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?