• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

vortech dyno results!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter the98stang
  • Start date Start date May 5, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
May 5, 2007
#1
  • May 5, 2007
  • #1
I am VERY pleased with my dyno results. I had the car tuned by Danny Swanson in Torrance, CA. I would highly recommend him to any people in Cali. My car put out 417.13 HP and 393.31 TQ!! This is with my Vortech v1 (stock pulley), custom front mount intercooler, and AFM powerpipe. I also have a X pipe and 3.73 gears. I frucking LOVE the power . Now it's time for some new street tires and suspension. I'll post the dyno sheet as soon as I get my hands on a scanner.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
May 5, 2007
#2
  • May 5, 2007
  • #2
Jesus, nice numbers for a S-trim
 

four six

Member
Jan 19, 2006
506
2
18
Hobart, IN
May 5, 2007
#3
  • May 5, 2007
  • #3
numbers
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
May 5, 2007
#4
  • May 5, 2007
  • #4
The sheet

 
R

Red2000GT

Founding Member
Sep 10, 2000
2,450
0
46
Regina,Sask.Canada
May 5, 2007
#5
  • May 5, 2007
  • #5
Little rough up top. Double check the gap on your plugs. Good numbers for a stock pulleyed s-trim though.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
May 5, 2007
#6
  • May 5, 2007
  • #6
It's prolly the belt slipping. I'm running BRFE7's at .033
 
R

Red2000GT

Founding Member
Sep 10, 2000
2,450
0
46
Regina,Sask.Canada
May 5, 2007
#7
  • May 5, 2007
  • #7
Crank that puppy down!!
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
May 5, 2007
#8
  • May 5, 2007
  • #8
VERY NICE! with a good A/F also. like said before, get a RR pulley and that suckers gonna scream!
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
May 6, 2007
#9
  • May 6, 2007
  • #9
imma SC noob lol - what is a RR pulley? 8 rib?
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
May 6, 2007
#10
  • May 6, 2007
  • #10
Reichard Racing is RR pulley. Good numbers, but your A/F is pretty damn lean. Not exactly something I would have let him tune to and just walk away and say have a great day lol. Most "safe" blower tunes for stock bottom end 2vs like to be kept around 11.4-11.8, for longevities take. If the tune is unlocked and you have an xcal 2 I would just add 2% fuel up top.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
May 6, 2007
#11
  • May 6, 2007
  • #11
very good numbers!!
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
May 6, 2007
#12
  • May 6, 2007
  • #12
BennyBlown2v said:
Reichard Racing is RR pulley. Good numbers, but your A/F is pretty damn lean. Not exactly something I would have let him tune to and just walk away and say have a great day lol. Most "safe" blower tunes for stock bottom end 2vs like to be kept around 11.4-11.8, for longevities take. If the tune is unlocked and you have an xcal 2 I would just add 2% fuel up top.
Click to expand...



I thgink if you'll look again benny you'll see it dips below 12:1 @ about 3800rpm and stays there for the rest of the pull. looks good to me, but hell I blow engines like a 2nd rate hooker on payday.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
May 6, 2007
#13
  • May 6, 2007
  • #13
BennyBlown2v said:
Reichard Racing is RR pulley. Good numbers, but your A/F is pretty damn lean. Not exactly something I would have let him tune to and just walk away and say have a great day lol. Most "safe" blower tunes for stock bottom end 2vs like to be kept around 11.4-11.8, for longevities take. If the tune is unlocked and you have an xcal 2 I would just add 2% fuel up top.
Click to expand...

I agree it is slightly lean past 6k rpm, but I'm not going to take the engine that high anyway. How can I use the Xcal2 to add more fuel?
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
May 6, 2007
#14
  • May 6, 2007
  • #14
VERY VERY nice mang! Now doesnt it feel good to be blown? N/A rocks, yea....but man boost really is suprising .

Im sortof mad right now lol, because I know I posted in your thread yesterday but it never showed up! I was the next person under your graph I believe...or I was going to be lol.

Basically I just said that I would keep the RPMs to no more than 6K and that it looked a bit lean up top because you were running out of fuel pump.
Tim at MPH was worried about mine going lean as the fuel pump ages, and mine never got above 11.8-1 @ 6200...maxed the pump out also.

Oh and what timing are your running?

....did you happen to post this on another forum???? MAYBE I posted else where and am now getting confused! LOL. I bet thats what happened! Because I could have sworn I posted in this thread, or one exactly like it LOL.
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
May 6, 2007
#15
  • May 6, 2007
  • #15
01Steeda said:
I thgink if you'll look again benny you'll see it dips below 12:1 @ about 3800rpm and stays there for the rest of the pull. looks good to me, but hell I blow engines like a 2nd rate hooker on payday.
Click to expand...

It's just all together lean up top. The car is intercooled so that helps keep IAT's down and reduce the chances detonation...but still it's lean. For the longevity of the motor, I would add some fuel. But yeah, there was no reason for them to rev it that high, you were probably floating a valve, thats why it looks all choppy LOL.

To add fuel with the xcal, go to load the tune, pick your custom tune the tuner put on there, then select "select optimized parameters?" by hitting the select button, scroll down to the fuel setting, change it to +2%.

I have no doubt the car runs great, and pulls hard. Good power + stock bottom end 2v + lean AT ALL = time for a new shortblock As long as you set the rev limiter to something reasonable, like 6000, it will be fine. Just watchin out man, don't wanna hear about no blown *in the bad way* motors
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
May 7, 2007
#16
  • May 7, 2007
  • #16
hotmustang331 said:
VERY VERY nice mang! Now doesnt it feel good to be blown? N/A rocks, yea....but man boost really is suprising .

Im sortof mad right now lol, because I know I posted in your thread yesterday but it never showed up! I was the next person under your graph I believe...or I was going to be lol.

Basically I just said that I would keep the RPMs to no more than 6K and that it looked a bit lean up top because you were running out of fuel pump.
Tim at MPH was worried about mine going lean as the fuel pump ages, and mine never got above 11.8-1 @ 6200...maxed the pump out also.

Oh and what timing are your running?

....did you happen to post this on another forum???? MAYBE I posted else where and am now getting confused! LOL. I bet thats what happened! Because I could have sworn I posted in this thread, or one exactly like it LOL.
Click to expand...

Yea I had the same thing posted on modular fords lol. I'm not sure what timing I'm running to be honest.

I'll try adding some more fuel with the xcal2 tomorrow.
 

AmBo

Active Member
Feb 3, 2004
1,027
1
36
New Jersey
May 7, 2007
#17
  • May 7, 2007
  • #17
Okay, I'm confused. Isn't redline 5,800? And you're pulling to 6,500? ?? Brain fart on my behalf?


Nice numbers though bud! Glad all went well!!!
 
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
May 7, 2007
#18
  • May 7, 2007
  • #18
6500is asking for stretched rods... 6200 is all that i would ever turn on stock bottom end...

i give it 6 months max if its a daily at that level.
 

AmBo

Active Member
Feb 3, 2004
1,027
1
36
New Jersey
May 7, 2007
#19
  • May 7, 2007
  • #19
Yea, you seriously have that thing tuned to the max to be putting down 400+ with your mods. I have more boltons than you just lacking the FMIC and I'm only putting down around 370 with Tim's tune. If it's not your DD, by all means, romp on it if you don't mind poping something. Otherwise, maybe look into taming the beast a bit.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
May 7, 2007
#20
  • May 7, 2007
  • #20
your right, i am on a laptop and didnt scroll past 6k lol. i didnt expect him to keep pulling it past 6k.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
2003 Mustang GT with Vortech Supercharger.
  • NorCalStang67
  • Jul 16, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2023
NorCalStang67
N
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
965
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
For Sale 2004 Mustang GT w/ Vortech Ti Trim
  • 50Dreamer
  • Oct 28, 2023
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
2K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Oct 28, 2023
50Dreamer
1
For Sale 1995 Mustang GT Convertible FOR SALE
  • #16Stang
  • Jun 21, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
991
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jun 21, 2024
#16Stang
1
Fox Am I The Only One Shocked By My Dyno Results?
  • Vinnyc1487
  • Sep 8, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2021
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?