Water 4 Gas - does this work?

Don't you think that everyone would use it if it worked? I don't think the Navy would waste its time putting nuclear reactors in submarines and carriers if you could just run an engine on water.
 
whats up all,

does anybody know if this thing works or not??? anybody done this???

Run Your Car on Water

other links:

Water Car Run on WATER+Fuel. Hydrogen Save Gas=FREE ENERGY!
Sick of High Gas Prices? Use water as a fuel !!!


someone who states the cons to it, is this true?

Is It Possible to Run Your Car on Water? - CNET Car Tech Forums

I would to add this to my stang and save about $100 on gas.

For $50 I'll tell you how it works. You'll still save $50 so you'll still be ahead. I promise to give you the $50 back if it doesn't work. :rlaugh:
 
I would really like to know how one quart of water is able to yield 1800 gallons of HHO Gas. Somehow that just doesn't add up especially when physics tell you that matter in a reaction balances and is quantifiable.

That said I'm always a little leery when I see a chick in a miniskirt telling me about the advantages of this and that. That's the typical distraction technique.

Now I'd like to know what THIS guy is doing...

http://www.wmur.com/video/16766229/index.html
 
Don't you think that everyone would use it if it worked? I don't think the Navy would waste its time putting nuclear reactors in submarines and carriers if you could just run an engine on water.

no i don't.

our gov't, the democrats and republicans have KEPT us DEPENDENT on oil for no reason at all. We are a 98% oil based economy, they say were dependent on it, i don't believe that ****.

watch this....

whats the answer to our 98% oil based economy?

There are several answers, but the Republicans and democrats have empowered the oil companies and conspired to destroy any successful inroads from the alternatives ...

YouTube - Who Killed the Electric Car? (Part 5 of 11)

also, get this. I know how to cure cancer without chemo, radiation and surgery.

guess what though, the DRUG companies, DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT IT. the drugs companies use the mainstream, tv, radio, newspapers, magazines - TO SHOVE down the american peoples throats and brainwash everyone into thinking the only option to curing cancer is chemo, radiation and surgery. it's so mainstream, it's sickening.

so yeah, i can believe this can easily be HUSHED up, just like a lot of other crap in this country.
 
Whatever you say bud, but theres one problem, the reactors in submarines and carriers have nothing to do with oil, they tend to run much better on uranium. Keep us posted on your cancer cure and how to run everything on water.
 
Whatever you say bud, but theres one problem, the reactors in submarines and carriers have nothing to do with oil, they tend to run much better on uranium. Keep us posted on your cancer cure and how to run everything on water.

thats nice, but what does that reply have to do with anything?
 
A scientist opined that it takes more energy to split the water molecule into it's component parts than you could ever hope to gain.

I have a few containers of snake oil you can add to your tank though, that really does work.

As for oil dependency, it's easy enough to tax water too. Look at all the dumbasses who buy it in bottles.
 
no i don't.

our gov't, the democrats and republicans have KEPT us DEPENDENT on oil for no reason at all. We are a 98% oil based economy, they say were dependent on it, i don't believe that ****.

watch this....

whats the answer to our 98% oil based economy?

There are several answers, but the Republicans and democrats have empowered the oil companies and conspired to destroy any successful inroads from the alternatives ...

YouTube - Who Killed the Electric Car? (Part 5 of 11)

also, get this. I know how to cure cancer without chemo, radiation and surgery.

guess what though, the DRUG companies, DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT IT. the drugs companies use the mainstream, tv, radio, newspapers, magazines - TO SHOVE down the american peoples throats and brainwash everyone into thinking the only option to curing cancer is chemo, radiation and surgery. it's so mainstream, it's sickening.

so yeah, i can believe this can easily be HUSHED up, just like a lot of other crap in this country.

We need a tin hat smiley

BTW I have always had one big problem with that who killed the electric car stuff.. and that problem is

There is pleanty of money to be made in electricity production to charge the electric cars.. The electric utility not only uses fossil fuels to produce electricity but they also have as much lobby power as oil interests so why are they not able to get favorable treatment from the government.

I will agree the government allows some really shady and downright evil **** to go on in the name of profits and campaign dollars but I don't think this is one of them.
 
Hey, great question, it is always better to ask then to just assume everything is a scam. Though, admittitatly, if I were trying to scam people, I would design a website exactly like that of Water For Gas. It reeks of scam.

However, it seems like the same concept behind this 400 HP 40MPG concept.

Ronn Motors' Scorpion: 450 horses, 40 miles to the gallon - Autoblog

Which could also be a scam.

Here is what your physics professor will tell you. No process is 100% efficient, and energy cannot be created from nothing. We get energy to drive our mustangs from sunshine that rained down on algae millions of years ago (gasoline). This contraption, takes energy from the gasoline, and uses it to split water. But you loose a great deal of energy in the process. The energy is in the gasoline, it is blown up in the engine at about 40% efficiency, then converted into electricity by your alternator at about 80% efficiency, then used to split water at about 80% efficiency (generous maybe), then that HHO gas is transported back into your engine and converted back to water at about 40% efficiency. So you can see, round the whole process, you are loosing energy, and I would guess actually getting worse gas mileage which would be noticed as a strain on the alternator, sort of like running the AC with the windows down. Now... the question is, is your physics professor right? They have been wrong before. There could be something going on here that is not fully understood. I dont know, but it would be fun to try the thing, and verify our current understanding or call it into question.
 
"Our technical staff believes that it's really not worth commenting on at all from a scientific point of view," he said. "We quite frankly don't even want to give it any credence or credibility by commenting on it publicly."

This is a quote from the Contra Costa Times article. This kind of sentimant really urks me. If you understand physics and or chemistry, you would not make such ridiculous comments. How long did it take me to discuss the issue properly and fully discount the idea? 2 minutes? This is such a cop out by folks who got Cs all through college and finally landed a job because their cousin new a guy, and now they hope to coast through life without making any waves. Technical staff.. now THAT is a scam.

Sorry for the rant, but this is a major pet peeve of mine.