• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Went to the track for the first time last night

  • Thread starter Thread starter fordman54935
  • Start date Start date Aug 7, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

cmb91LX

New Member
Apr 20, 2004
432
0
0
Memphis
Aug 10, 2004
#41
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #41
Gearbanger 101 said:
Cause .500 is a perfect light. Anything below that is a redlight. (aka foul start)
http://www.nhra.com/basics/dayatdrags.html

"Full Tree: used in Competition, Super Stock, and Stock, for which a handicap starting system is used to equalize competition. The three amber bulbs on the Christmas Tree flash consecutively five-tenths of a second apart, followed five-tenths later by the green starting light. A perfect reaction time on a full Tree is .500."
Click to expand...


I have never seen a test and tune night/session run on a .500 light. As far as I have ever seen on TnT night a .001 is still not redlighting
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 10, 2004
#42
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #42
Maybe the .500 light applys only to actual head to head racing, rather than just test and tune, "Run Whatcha Brung" sorta thing? Like I said earlier, it may depend on who's sanctioning the event?
 

axeman

Founding Member
Feb 9, 2001
1,348
0
36
Elizabethtown, PA
Aug 10, 2004
#43
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #43
got me too. i'm almost sure there was post about it not too long ago. when i get some free time i'll look into it.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Aug 10, 2004
#44
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #44
fordman54935 said:
I think I would be pleased with those results. What kind of (theoretical) 1/4 miles times and flywheel HP would I be looking at?
Click to expand...


Weight plays in here heavily. One of my customers with an 87 notch that weighed 3100# w/o him ran 12.7@107mph on a stock cam, ported heads, ported stock lower, stock upper and TB with long tubes. He was a very good driver too. HIs dyno was 242RWHP and 292RWTQ. The one who made 255RWHP & 311RWTQ ran 13.9@100mph because he has a heavy 95GT.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
926
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Holley Sniper review - The good, the bad, and learn from my frustration
  • LX Dave
  • Aug 14, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
61K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 19, 2026
AeroCoupe
2
A9L Not Commanding Timing?
  • 2ndlaw
  • Sep 25, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 7, 2019
2ndlaw
2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?