• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Were to get custom crank?

  • Thread starter Thread starter moneypit94
  • Start date Start date Mar 26, 2004

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Mar 26, 2004
#1
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #1
Lately my drive for more power has been getting to me... Im thinking of a new setup with a dart block... Thinking of using the iron eagle 302 block that comes with a 4.125 bore and will allow up to 3.75 stroke or up to a 4.00 stroke with some machine work.

I can't seem to find a crank though.. What is the difference between a 351 crank and 302 crank besides stroke size and weight? Can a 351 crank be turned down to fit a 302?

Im thinking of a 3.75 stroke crank. That would yeild me 401 CI's. Now if i did a 4.00 stroke that would yeild me 427 CI's out of a 302 based block.

I am wanting to do something different.. Maybe even like a 383 or something... But I need to find out some more info and options on cranks...

Right now my thoughts are on a 401 with a cam designed to peak around 6500-7000 rpms, or just a blown 401, or both
Ideally i want to hit over 800 rear wheel horse.. but would settle for anything above 600 and maybe im stretching this but i want it to still be streetable.

Also as far as pistons and stuff goes it looks like i can find chevy stuff that would work.. Just have to have rods that would fit chevy wristpin size and ford crank journal size.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Mar 26, 2004
#2
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #2
You cannot use a 351 crank in a 302 or vise versa. The main bearing journal diameter and rod journal diameters are different. I'm sure bearings are different sizes as well, but could probably be made to fit. I would call a place like SCAT and ask them. They have to offer a custom crankshaft size, but how much you are willing to pay is going to come into affect. The best, most efficient way to make more cubic inches and more power is to put a bigger rod in it. A longer stroke will not have the same affect as the longer rod will.

You know what would be cool? To try to get a 351 out of a 302. You would probably have to get a custom piston that has the ring lands way down at the bottom of the piston, with big valve reliefs. After my current motor goes (which won't be anytime soon), that's what I'm going to try and make.

It's just money. You gotta pay to play....

Joe
 

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Mar 26, 2004
#3
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #3
I guess i could make it easy on myself and go with a normal 3.400 (347) crank.. It would end up being a 363.. That would be different... Crank and rods wouldn't be hard to come by... just the pistons now...
 
3

331 cobra

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
398
0
0
Silicon Valley CA
Mar 26, 2004
#4
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #4
If you want the most stroke possible, buy a 347 crank with stock 302 sized journals, then get a set of chevy 400 pistons (8 of a kind, right or left, I'm not sure) with the shortest compression height possible. Now you just offset grind the crank to make it work with 2" small journal 5.4" rods and an 8.2" deck height. Then just pray that it can be ballenced.

But even if it works out, your rod ratio will be marginal and you want to spin it pretty high. I think you need to take a step back and go with something a bit less radical. You want to do a big bore with a stroke that is really pushing the limits of the 5.0 block, make 800 rwhp and rev it high. That's four different big departures from the norm.

If it were me, I would either build a turbo 331 with a really built bottom end, or just turn up the boost on the 418.

But, if you have to do it, Eagle makes a 5.4" H beam with the 2" journal size.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
1966 mustang starter and pulley troubles
  • Hotrods4ray
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
355
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 10, 2026
Realmongo
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
209
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
810
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
M
4.6 2v ready to go in.
  • Michael007
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2024
Mustang5L5
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?