• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

What carburetor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Csk158
  • Start date Start date Nov 3, 2020
C

Csk158

New Member
Nov 3, 2020
1
0
1
Michigan
Nov 3, 2020
#1
  • Nov 3, 2020
  • #1
What size carburetor for 65 coupe, manual transmission, 289 30 over 10.5 to 1 compression ,aluminum heads (Dart). Edobrock air gap Intake. 355 or 373 gears. Cam specs say 2500 to 6500.msd drop in distributor. Street car don't car about mileage not a daily driver. But something that will run good. Builder says 600. I am thinking 500 maybe 570. The calculator says 515. If I go with a 600 or a 570 will it need to be jetted way down. Any real world experience.
 

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Nov 3, 2020
#2
  • Nov 3, 2020
  • #2
Csk158 said:
What size carburetor for 65 coupe, manual transmission, 289 30 over 10.5 to 1 compression ,aluminum heads (Dart). Edobrock air gap Intake. 355 or 373 gears. Cam specs say 2500 to 6500.msd drop in distributor. Street car don't car about mileage not a daily driver. But something that will run good. Builder says 600. I am thinking 500 maybe 570. The calculator says 515. If I go with a 600 or a 570 will it need to be jetted way down. Any real world experience.
Click to expand...
Your builder is probably pretty close.

You're sitting at 293cid, and with those heads and that cam, you're going to be missing quite a bit of power with anything smaller than about 570-600cfm.

If you want good street manners with your combo, an Edelbrock 600cfm (part number 1406 for electric choke, 1405 for manual) would be really hard to beat. A smaller carburetor will give you slightly better throttle response at the expense of not being able to take full advantage of that cam. If you were leaning more towards a street/strip motor you could even go a little bigger with a 625 or 650, you've got a lot of airflow on that top-end.
 
R

rbancy

Member
May 12, 2020
29
2
13
Victoria, BC, Canada
Nov 8, 2020
#3
  • Nov 8, 2020
  • #3
1406 edelbrock would be a good choice for you. . 600cfm electric choke
 

MrGEM

Member
Jan 8, 2000
5
1
13
Colorado
Jan 30, 2021
#4
  • Jan 30, 2021
  • #4
Agree with those suggesting a 1406 Edelbrock. Simple, reliable, and a good performer on just about anything beteen 250 and 350 C.I.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

94 Cobra Moral Dilemma
  • Dscraggle
  • Jun 29, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 7, 2021
Mark 95 GT Convertible
M
R
  • Locked
SOLD 1964 Weber Carbureted 289 Hipo $10k Firm
  • Robert Campbell
  • Sep 5, 2016
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
7K
Engine and Power Adder Sep 17, 2016
Robert Campbell
R
What Would It Take For 800 Horsies
  • Pops Fun
  • May 28, 2013
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2013
Pops Fun
Progress Thread Almost ready for the road, Need input for parts!
  • jpope417
  • Apr 19, 2013
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2013
jpope417
L
  • Locked
SHOW CAR!! ...1988 Mustang LX-49K MILES(331 Stroker/TKO600/31 Spline/Willwood) TX
  • LS3vette
  • Nov 13, 2011
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
6
Views
8K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 25, 2011
pack018
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?