• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

What did I do wrong in adjusting my rockers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheBocSez
  • Start date Start date Feb 25, 2006

TheBocSez

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
652
0
0
Converse, TX
Feb 25, 2006
#1
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #1
I just put the heads on my new engine and installed the lifter and rockers. I am using E7 Powerheads with the Crane Cams stud conversion kit installed. I installed new FRPP stock length pushrods and Crane Energizer Roller rockers.

I adjusted the rockers using the method outlined here:

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=542361&highlight=adjusting+roller+rockers

Starting at #1 when the exhaust 1st started to open, I adjusted the intake by twirling the pushrod until resistance was felt the I adjusted the lock nut between 1/2 and 3/4 turn and secured it with the poly lock.

I then rotated the engine until the intake valve on the same cylinder was almost fully closed and I adjusted the exhaust using the same method and number of turns.

I repeated this process on the remaining cylinders in the firing order until all 8 were done.

The reason I think something has to be wrong is that I see a lot of post asking how to adjust roller rockers and it didnt seem like that big of a task. Actually went pretty quick.

There is some light side to side movement on the rockers when they both closed but I assume that will tighen up when the lifters are pumped up.

So, what did I do wrong or is it just one of those things that is made out to be harder than it is??

while I have you here, when I installed my head gaskets, As long as I put the word front to the front, there should be no issues correct? I used the Felpro 1011-1 (think thats the #)
 

Black1987Stang

Active Member
Aug 22, 2004
1,422
0
37
Jersey Shore
Feb 26, 2006
#2
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #2
I think u confused me, u dont have any problems right? u just were surprised how easy it was? yea it is easy but it certainly does suck having to bend over the fenderwell, especially in the cold etc.

But yea as long as the hgs has FRONT in the front its good to go. If u didnt youll prob have an overheating problem, first time i did my headgaskets i put the Front in the rear on the passenger side head, cuz i figured the words and design should be on top on both sides not half and half, it was all ready to crank and i found out i had to tear it down and redo it.
 

TheBocSez

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
652
0
0
Converse, TX
Feb 26, 2006
#3
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #3
Yeah I was being a little sarchastic. I had just seen it posted so many times where people were asking how to do it, that I guess I had it in my mind that it was some major undertaking. Once I did it, I was suprised at how easy it went. Now to be honest, I did have the advantage of having the engine on a stand so I didnt have to contend with leaning over the car or any of that stuff. Everything was right there.
 

Black1987Stang

Active Member
Aug 22, 2004
1,422
0
37
Jersey Shore
Feb 26, 2006
#4
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #4
TheBocSez said:
Yeah I was being a little sarchastic. I had just seen it posted so many times where people were asking how to do it, that I guess I had it in my mind that it was some major undertaking. Once I did it, I was suprised at how easy it went. Now to be honest, I did have the advantage of having the engine on a stand so I didnt have to contend with leaning over the car or any of that stuff. Everything was right there.
Click to expand...

Yea i gotcha, and the stand wayyy easier than being in a car.
 
S

SamSnyder

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
196
0
0
Feb 26, 2006
#5
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #5
Doesn't sound like you did anything wrong but if you did: when they're too tight the car will run rough because the valves aren't closing fully, which will feel like you've got a good sized miss; and if they're too loose you'll hear a lot of clatter from the valve train because you have excess lash.
 

stang8urimport

Autozone Junkie
Founding Member
Jun 21, 2002
1,499
12
59
Daytona Beach, FL
Feb 26, 2006
#6
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #6
I believe the 5.0 Mustangs take the 1011-2 Felpro Headgaskets, but don't quote me.......
 

TheBocSez

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
652
0
0
Converse, TX
Feb 26, 2006
#7
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #7
PoopDawg said:
I believe the 5.0 Mustangs take the 1011-2 Felpro Headgaskets, but don't quote me.......
Click to expand...

I think it will use either but the difference is what material the metal around the cylinder is. I think one is steel and the other is copper or something like that. But like you said, im not 100% either.
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Feb 26, 2006
#8
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #8
Sounds like you did it right and it worked.

I go cylinder at at time, an adjust at tdc on the firing stroke. My 79 Ford shop manual had the procedure where you only have to index the cam 3 times and you can get all 16 valves on the base circle to adjust. I did that once and had a miserable running vacuum leaking motor.

Went back and re did it cylinder at a time and it was fine.

Couple years later I saw the same 3 position diagram in a book, and compared it to the Ford Shop Manual. The Ford manual had the d@^* diagram printed mirror image, totally wrong!

Gotta love this stuff.....
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Feb 26, 2006
#9
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #9
rd said:
Sounds like you did it right and it worked.

I go cylinder at at time, an adjust at tdc on the firing stroke. My 79 Ford shop manual had the procedure where you only have to index the cam 3 times and you can get all 16 valves on the base circle to adjust. I did that once and had a miserable running vacuum leaking motor.

Went back and re did it cylinder at a time and it was fine.

Couple years later I saw the same 3 position diagram in a book, and compared it to the Ford Shop Manual. The Ford manual had the d@^* diagram printed mirror image, totally wrong!

Gotta love this stuff.....
Click to expand...
I did mine a cylinder at a time as well, zero errors!
 
R

Raginstang

New Member
Sep 28, 2003
166
0
0
SANTA CRUZ CA
Feb 26, 2006
#10
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #10
the 1011-2 has a copper ring around the cylinders so that it wont damage the bottome of ALumminum Cylinder heads when you torque them down.. use those ones if you have alluminum heads..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
554
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
854
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine Valve and or rocker noise .....new to this but dont mind getting my hands dirty.
  • mustang matt 1993
  • Jun 29, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2024
rednotch
Y
Engine Oily cylinder- bad lifter relationship
  • Yoyoda
  • Nov 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
459
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 16, 2024
Yoyoda
Y
Engine adjust roller rockers on new 393
  • maxine-70
  • Dec 27, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 30, 2023
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?