• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

What do you think about my times at the track?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 02bluegtstang
  • Start date Start date Sep 28, 2006
0

02bluegtstang

Banned
Aug 27, 2006
0
0
0
Los angeles, california
Sep 28, 2006
#1
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #1
So i went to the track today and my best time was:

14.3

What do you guys think about my time with the small mods i have (basically stock car haha)...

It was hard to get the shifting right at first because the shifter is a pain in the ass...but i got it down and go 14.3
 

OV10stang

Member
Aug 7, 2005
48
0
16
Pembroke, NH
Sep 28, 2006
#2
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #2
Same et I had first time to the track. I missed 3rd gear on my first run, ran a 14.7. By the end of that night I got it down to a 14.3. Out of 5 runs, I missed 3rd twice! The next day I installed a Steeda Triax, haven't missed a gear since, that was a year ago.
My stock shifter didn't spring load to center like the the Steeda, had to hunt for 3rd....
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Sep 28, 2006
#3
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #3
About average. I ran a 15.0 my first time out... hahaha...
 

nwapache

New Member
Jun 27, 2006
313
0
0
Seattle,WA
Sep 28, 2006
#4
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #4
dead on for a street car with no suspension mods, you could trim another .1 or so practicing your launches...welcome to the 1/4 mile mod frenzy....DR's LCA's yada yada yada
 

DocG

5th graders > me. They're not bant
Sep 25, 2005
8,297
1,358
194
Cincinnati area
Sep 28, 2006
#5
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #5
That's a pretty good time for a car that's pretty much stock. I doubt the CAI and mufflers really helped you any. Maybe as much as the reduced drag co-effecient thanks to that short antenna.

What was your 60ft?
 

goshia

New Member
Jul 1, 2005
252
0
0
Mead, Colorado
Sep 28, 2006
#6
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #6
antenaa

DocG2828 said:
That's a pretty good time for a car that's pretty much stock. I doubt the CAI and mufflers really helped you any. Maybe as much as the reduced drag co-effecient thanks to that short antenna.

What was your 60ft?
Click to expand...
 
0

02bluegtstang

Banned
Aug 27, 2006
0
0
0
Los angeles, california
Sep 28, 2006
#7
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #7
Reaction: .371
I1: 2.383
I2: 6.337
I3: 9.614
MPH (I3): 74.887
I4: 12.358

E.T. 14.816 (corrected E.T. 14.371)
MPH 94.708 (corrected mph 97.549)

Those times were corrected per LACR.NET instructions...

Altitude Correction
LACR is 2,710 ft. above sea level.
To figure the altitude factor the formula is as follows:
ET: multiply your et (at LACR) by .97
MPH: multiply your mph (at LACR) by 1.03
This will give you the ET & MPH at sea level.
 
S

Sable

New Member
May 11, 2006
22
0
0
Akron, Ohio
Sep 28, 2006
#8
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #8
Sounds right to me. With a 60 like that you have plenty more left in it if you practice those launches.
 
0

02bluegtstang

Banned
Aug 27, 2006
0
0
0
Los angeles, california
Sep 28, 2006
#9
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #9
what rpm should i launch at? i was launchin at a lil more than 2k...can i go all the way to redline or does it cutoff a little before or after....if i tune it could i go all the way in redline?
 

HoustonGT

Gilded Gelding
Apr 6, 2003
1,418
0
0
Houston
Sep 28, 2006
#10
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #10
02bluegtstang said:
what rpm should i launch at? i was launchin at a lil more than 2k...can i go all the way to redline or does it cutoff a little before or after....if i tune it could i go all the way in redline?
Click to expand...
Don't go all the way to redline, shift at 5500 into 2nd. Wait a bit longer to shift into 3rd. Worked for me and i ran a 13.8@101 with x-pipe and catback on heavy ass chrome 18's. My 60' sucksed (2.2), so i know this car is capable of alot more which surprises me since its just got exhaust mods.
With better springs (H&R's), new tires, and my new MGW shifter, im shooting for 13.6's with no other power mods other than the exhaust.
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Sep 28, 2006
#11
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #11
02bluegtstang said:
Reaction: .371
I1: 2.383
I2: 6.337
I3: 9.614
MPH (I3): 74.887
I4: 12.358

E.T. 14.816 (corrected E.T. 14.371)
MPH 94.708 (corrected mph 97.549)

Those times were corrected per LACR.NET instructions...

Altitude Correction
LACR is 2,710 ft. above sea level.
To figure the altitude factor the formula is as follows:
ET: multiply your et (at LACR) by .97
MPH: multiply your mph (at LACR) by 1.03
This will give you the ET & MPH at sea level.
Click to expand...

Ok, so you didn't actually run a 14.3? You ran a 14.8? Don't correct the numbers, just go with what the timeslip says. Or did the timeslip say 14.3?
 

mustangkid05

New Member
Mar 10, 2006
199
0
0
Sep 28, 2006
#12
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #12
not bad
 
P

Pennywise2

Banned
May 16, 2006
1,379
1
0
Sep 28, 2006
#13
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • #13
Pretty good times.With some pratice you could be in
the high 13's.Practice your launches at the track and
practice practice you should see better times.Houston
is right you will see your best times shifting between
5300-5500 rpm's.
 
S

SilverStang04

New Member
Jun 2, 2004
0
0
0
So. Cal.
Sep 29, 2006
#14
  • Sep 29, 2006
  • #14
Hey Bluegtstang, you gonna be at LACR tonight (9/29)?
 

gtvertsoon

New Member
Apr 17, 2005
154
0
0
Port Tobacco, MD
Sep 29, 2006
#15
  • Sep 29, 2006
  • #15
Sounds decent. My first time down the quarter I ran a 14.8 but forgot to take off traction control. Mods were LT's, o/r H, flowmasters, JLT intake and MGW shifter. Eventually got it down to a 14.14 with a 2.1 60ft. Just practice I guess. Went to the track last week and my launches sucked balls.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Sep 29, 2006
#16
  • Sep 29, 2006
  • #16
TweekedGT said:
Ok, so you didn't actually run a 14.3? You ran a 14.8? Don't correct the numbers, just go with what the timeslip says. Or did the timeslip say 14.3?
Click to expand...


I posted only uncorrected times on here because I live at sea level but to be fair to somebody that lives in high altitude I think those people should post corrected times, just for the simple reason that I hate reading somebody in utah running a 15 in his stock gt and some dip**** posting " dude you suck gt's run 14.0 stock"

bottom line is corrected times are fair game because how else can you compare cars from different parts of the country hell you can't even compare your own runs if you don't correct them.

but about this guys times. from what I read in the time correction he needs to work on his launch. a 2.3 60 foot is killing him, the trap of 97 corrected is low too.. this could be because of slow shifting. bottom line is I think he needs to practice, sorry I am not trying to be a jerk I am just being honest. Plus don't feel bad my first time out I went a best of 14.3 corrected 14.5 uncorrected. I took my lunps that night learned a few lessons and went back the following week and ran a stock 13.903 uncorrected at 99 mph. corrected that run was a 13.8 run at 101 only mod I had was weld in flows.

These are the things I changed when I went back.

1. forget trying to kill the light. **** the light just get comfortable and launch when you want to launch, the R/T does not help your times at all. after you get good then worry about the tree.

2. practice launching, find a place to practice and do a bunch of 0-30 runs. thats what I did and my 60 droped from 2.3-2.4 to 2.0-2.1 on crappy street tires.

3. powershift, practice it untill you can do it without any fear at all. You are not going to break your tranny with stock power. I had maybe thousands of powershifts on my t-45 and with almost 80k on it the thing was just fine, still ripped 2nd,3rd and sometimes 4th if I was beating the bag out of it. If you don't feel comfortable powershifting 2-3 then atleast do 1-2 and 3-4 ( if you have gears) if you have the stock 3.27's you should still be in 3rd when you hit the traps.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
930
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
305
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
758
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
S
New motor help. First start successful. Now will not turn over.
  • SavStang
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
132
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2025
SavStang
S
Opinions on a possible project car w/ pics
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
10
Views
285
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Mar 30, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?