• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

what engine for my next project

  • Thread starter Thread starter bartman
  • Start date Start date Mar 13, 2010

bartman

Member
Jan 2, 2004
76
0
7
FL
Mar 13, 2010
#1
  • Mar 13, 2010
  • #1
Finishing up one project and heading into the next one. Should have my Father-in-laws 71 Firebird TA clone done in next three or four months. So will be turning attention back to the Blue Oval. I've had 67 fasb sitting in garage for 11 years (why be in a hurry). Goingt to be buildin with my son-in-law. Probably will run a stroker in it. I currently have a 351 C block and a C6 also have a 5.0 with a T5. Thought a 351C stroked might be interesting. Not real familiar with the C though. Any thoughts or specific info on stroker kits for the C? Thanks Bart
 
A

ajfriz

New Member
Sep 26, 2008
18
0
0
Mar 14, 2010
#2
  • Mar 14, 2010
  • #2
There are advantages to both the 351c and the 5.0. The 5.0 can be stroked pretty cheap compared to the cleveland, but the cleveland is capable of more power and has a stronger block than the 5.0.

You can stroke a cleveland to a 377, 383, 393, 396, 408, 416, and 426. I have even seen one that was a 440, although I wouldn't go that big. 4v cleveland heads flow extremely well and can be capable of over 500hp without even porting.

Although you can get some pretty awesome power out of a cleveland, I still chose to build a 5.0 because of cost and weight. I also didn't want to cut the shock towers in my 64.5. I started with a 5.0 H.O. with some ported gt40 heads, weiand intake, mild cam, and some tri y headers and it will make some great power for the weight of the car, but if I were building a 67 fastback I would probably go with a cleveland.
 

bartman

Member
Jan 2, 2004
76
0
7
FL
Mar 14, 2010
#3
  • Mar 14, 2010
  • #3
thanks ajfriz,
I've been doing some checking online today and am leaning toward the 351C stroked, since it is in a 67. It will be something a little different. Although I'll do a 5.0 storked for my 65 because I don't want to deal with shock towers either. I have a 75 351C block with 2v heads. I will probably run aftermarket alum. heads. Looks like 500 hp and 500 lbs of torque shouldn't be to hard to accomplish and while not the cheapest not to bad in the wallet. Son in law is wantin to run the 5 speed. Does sound like fun!!!
bartman
 
G

Grabber70Mach

Member
Jul 6, 2003
305
0
17
Indian Head, MD
Mar 15, 2010
#4
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #4
Might want to check this guy out

Stroker Kits
 

bartman

Member
Jan 2, 2004
76
0
7
FL
Mar 15, 2010
#5
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #5
Grabber,
Thanks for the link. I can't wait to get started
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Mar 15, 2010
#6
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #6
Another one to look at, scat crank and rods with probe pistons. 10-1 compression. 408 cuin

14213-SCA-279-F408 - Ford 408C Reverse Dome -16.0cc Scat-Based Engine Kit
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Mar 16, 2010
#7
  • Mar 16, 2010
  • #7
ajfriz said:
There are advantages to both the 351c and the 5.0. The 5.0 can be stroked pretty cheap compared to the cleveland, but the cleveland is capable of more power and has a stronger block than the 5.0.

You can stroke a cleveland to a 377, 383, 393, 396, 408, 416, and 426. I have even seen one that was a 440, although I wouldn't go that big. 4v cleveland heads flow extremely well and can be capable of over 500hp without even porting.

Although you can get some pretty awesome power out of a cleveland, I still chose to build a 5.0 because of cost and weight. I also didn't want to cut the shock towers in my 64.5. I started with a 5.0 H.O. with some ported gt40 heads, weiand intake, mild cam, and some tri y headers and it will make some great power for the weight of the car, but if I were building a 67 fastback I would probably go with a cleveland.
Click to expand...

A REAL Cleveland can be stroked to 408 max, and some people will tell you that 408 is pushing it. The pin will intersect the bottom ring on a 408. I think you are talking about using an aftermarket Windsor style block with Cleveland heads (which is not a bad way to go). The Cleveland heads flow great and would flow even better with a large bore build.

Edit: for a lot of build information and general tech on the Cleveland, go here: http://www.network54.com/Forum/119419/
Most forums will have a lot of mis-information on the Cleveland, but that forum is really good.
 

bartman

Member
Jan 2, 2004
76
0
7
FL
Mar 17, 2010
#8
  • Mar 17, 2010
  • #8
Thanks to all for info. I am looking to do a 75 cleavland block with aftermarket heads. I have 2 v not aussie heads. I don't like what I have read about detonation problems with the 2 v. This project is for a 67 fsb that was orginally for my daughter and her husband and I are finishing it. But I am thinking of 351w stroked for my 65 fsb. That project is a couple years out though. Anyone goin to Daytona for spring fling? Maybe I'll see ya there. Bartman
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
I need help with my 351w project's ventalation
  • MintyFresh
  • Nov 25, 2019
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
3K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 29, 2019
MintyFresh
M
The "Extra Engine" Post....hmmm
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jan 17, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 3, 2020
Wayne Waldrep
The Night of the Hurricane (a really long stupid story)
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 26, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 1, 2011
VibrantRedGT
Click here for a laugh...
  • 1991notchbackLX
  • May 30, 2009
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 3 4 5
Replies
82
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2009
strtrcr50
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?