• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

What exhaust cat-back provides the best HP for the best $?

  • Thread starter Thread starter N8Miller
  • Start date Start date Jun 28, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Jun 28, 2005
#1
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #1
I have seen the chart, but its an older one. But i wanted to know, since my taillpipe now has a hole it in, which one i should get if i do decide to get a new cat-back rather than just 2 new tail pipes?
Flowmaster is what i have, and EVERYONE has it.
Whats out there thats good and a good price?
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jun 28, 2005
#2
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #2
Considering your setup, I would say something straight through. Otherwise I don't really know if it would matter that much. Whatever you like the sound of the most.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jun 28, 2005
#3
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #3
Nate, get a mac cat back. I just heard my friend matt's car last night and it sounded killer. He has a h/c/i 5.0 with my old bbk longtubes, dr gas X and the mac cat back.

If you have a hole in your pipe, put some muffler putty on it. No need to spend $300+ on a cat back when theres more ideal parts you need now
 

NosPony

New Member
Apr 2, 2004
278
0
0
Canton, Il
Jun 28, 2005
#4
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #4
I have a Magnaflow setup on my car and love it. Might want to give it a try.
 
K

Kerpal

New Member
Aug 9, 2004
400
0
0
Jun 29, 2005
#5
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #5
Grn92LX said:
Nate, get a mac cat back. I just heard my friend matt's car last night and it sounded killer. He has a h/c/i 5.0 with my old bbk longtubes, dr gas X and the mac cat back.

If you have a hole in your pipe, put some muffler putty on it. No need to spend $300+ on a cat back when theres more ideal parts you need now
Click to expand...

I like my Mac catback... it'd probably sound pretty mean on your car, considering how it sounds on my stock 5.0.
 
G

GNN60GT500

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
1,218
26
48
5 car lengths in front of you!
Jun 29, 2005
#6
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #6
MAC is cheaper then Magnaflow- however also provides less hp gains-

$ per hp they are pretty equal-

It all depends on how much you are going to spend- you will pay more for Magnaflow- but that extra money will get you the same hp/$

so from that stand point, they are both a good choice-
 
P

Polter83

New Member
Jul 27, 2004
74
0
0
Jun 29, 2005
#7
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #7
Bassani, but you get what you pay for..
 
G

GNN60GT500

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
1,218
26
48
5 car lengths in front of you!
Jun 29, 2005
#8
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #8
www.mach1review.com

check the exhaust shoot out-

Magnaflow made more hp then the Bassani
 
P

Polter83

New Member
Jul 27, 2004
74
0
0
Jun 29, 2005
#9
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #9
This is only the muffler.. gives alittle idea..shrug magna and bassani are the better but costlier

http://www.andersonfordmotorsport.com/

Media, Muffler shootout
 

darthcual

Member
Mar 31, 2005
985
19
18
Arlington, TX
Jun 29, 2005
#10
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #10
Magnaflow for there straight thru design. Also it seems hardly anyone ever mentions dynomax's. I have these but dumped and I love the sound. It reminds me of the old musclecars of the past. I guess cuz all that glass packing they put in.
 
P

Polter83

New Member
Jul 27, 2004
74
0
0
Jun 29, 2005
#11
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #11
But remember about backpressure.. if you get too much size and flow then you will lose alittle low end..
 
B

BaXTeR3221

Member
Jan 12, 2004
917
0
16
Orange County, NY
Jun 29, 2005
#12
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #12
I had Mac on my old 88. I really miss that sound, if i ever get a new catback, thats what i'm gonna go with.
 
P

Project89

New Member
Apr 24, 2005
94
0
0
Panama City, Florida
Jun 29, 2005
#13
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #13
HP & Mufflers? Come on the issue is more about sound, the power gains are not really noticeable. I slapped catback flows on mine and all I noticed was the sound. Correct me if I am wrong.
 
G

GNN60GT500

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
1,218
26
48
5 car lengths in front of you!
Jun 29, 2005
#14
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #14
When you say flows- do you mean Magnaflow or Flowmasters-

people refer to them both as flows not- confuses the heck out of me-
 
P

Project89

New Member
Apr 24, 2005
94
0
0
Panama City, Florida
Jun 29, 2005
#15
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #15
GNN60GT500 said:
When you say flows- do you mean Magnaflow or Flowmasters-

people refer to them both as flows not- confuses the heck out of me-
Click to expand...
Oops! My fault, they are flowmaster catbacks.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jun 29, 2005
#16
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #16
Dynomax Ultra Flo Welded. They flow over 1000 cfm compared to Flowmaster's 450 cfm...I think it would be sufficient.
 
G

GNN60GT500

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
1,218
26
48
5 car lengths in front of you!
Jun 29, 2005
#17
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #17
Well Flowmasters are more sound oriented then anything- they were built more for sound then hp- so that would probably explain it-

I picked up 7rwhp on my 5.0 with bolt ons going from Flows to Mags on a pretty much stock 90 GT
 
W

wildstang87

New Member
Jun 9, 2005
96
0
0
Jun 29, 2005
#18
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #18
that 7rwhp was probably attributed to many other things. ambient temp, oil temp, coolant temp, etc... you wont even see 7 going from stock to a dynomax.
 

mondos90lx

Member
Nov 18, 2004
243
0
16
Stoneham Massachusetts
Jun 29, 2005
#19
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #19
i run equal length headers, through a bassani off road xpipe and into a mac cat back....love it compared to my old old old flows, im not gonna lie i felt a lil power increase, but nothing to even really talk about..lol
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jun 30, 2005
#20
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #20
wildstang87 said:
that 7rwhp was probably attributed to many other things. ambient temp, oil temp, coolant temp, etc... you wont even see 7 going from stock to a dynomax.
Click to expand...

Yeah, maybe on a stock engine, but on a car with an H/C/I combo it could make a huge difference.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved Three way cat converters..?
  • PonyGTrider
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
270
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 2, 2025
PonyGTrider
Fox BBK X-pipe replacement Cat?
  • TIGGER
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
307
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
L
Is catback worth it over axle backs?
  • Lorencarson
  • May 15, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
695
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 15, 2025
89ripper
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
594
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
C
Engine Idle cuts out
  • claypoolxx
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
798
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 24, 2026
alutwon
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?