• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

What is a better combo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom95gt
  • Start date Start date Jan 24, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Tom95gt

Member
Oct 10, 2007
186
1
19
South Jersey
Jan 24, 2008
#1
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #1
A Blown 306 or NA 331 or 341 Stroker?
 
S

sage2k

Member
May 23, 2005
645
0
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Jan 24, 2008
#2
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #2
does the 306 have stock heads cam and intake?
Id prolly do the blower
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 24, 2008
#3
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #3
A good h/c/i blown car is going to run quicker, all else being equal.

A good h/c/i 347 is something nice as well. Probably a little less "hiccups" to mess with as well...
 

Tom95gt

Member
Oct 10, 2007
186
1
19
South Jersey
Jan 24, 2008
#4
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #4
yea just a mild h/c/i with a blower or a 331 or 347 that has been worked
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
Jan 24, 2008
#5
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #5
i dont know what you mean by "better", but you can bet the h/c/i car with a blower will out run the 347
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 24, 2008
#6
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #6
Neither

They are just different

Circumstances could make one more preferable to the other

Grady
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,125
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Jan 24, 2008
#7
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #7
Who doesnt like boost?!
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jan 24, 2008
#8
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #8
Blown 306!
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Jan 24, 2008
#9
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #9
I'm with Grady on this one, kind of like a question that should be approached VERY differently.
 

ford302redneck

Member
Jul 28, 2007
85
0
6
Hartsville, SC
Jan 24, 2008
#10
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #10
I guess the real question is "Better for what?"
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 24, 2008
#11
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #11
ford302redneck said:
I guess the real question is "Better for what?"
Click to expand...

Exactly

Look at my sig combo and consider it has just 50K miles
so
The block is fairly tight and fresh
so
I see it as practical to use the OEM block

Considering all that ... a blower at low boost could be very practical ... For Me

Now ... Say I had a high mileage motor with just a few minor bolt ons
but
Nothing like the aftermarket stuff I now got

Then ... You Bet

An all motor 347 would be on the short list
or
Maybe ... a fresh 302-306 with a blower

See where I'm going here?
as I currently am ...
Most of my combo would be too small if I decided to go 347
and
I'm not a good candidate for a high boost setup

Hey ... Its all about application
and
That application can be influenced by ... circumstances

Grady
 

Tom95gt

Member
Oct 10, 2007
186
1
19
South Jersey
Jan 24, 2008
#12
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #12
yea i wanna make strong power and keep my daily driving ability because i love driving my car. engine combos are such a big decision to make. their are so many to choose from.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Jan 24, 2008
#13
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #13
final5-0 said:
Neither

They are just different

Circumstances could make one more preferable to the other

Grady
Click to expand...

:Word:

a centrifugal supercharger on an otherwise stock gives good drivability because at low rpms, it is essentially stock, but at high rpms, the boost kicks in and you get an extra kick in the pants. also, the stock cam is actually pretty good for superchargers because it has little (if any) overlap
 
D

Danman765432

Member
Mar 3, 2006
471
0
16
Nutley, NJ
Jan 24, 2008
#14
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #14
A forged 331 with a H/C/I and a 150 wet shot of nitrous..Maybe a plate kit that sits between the upper and lower intake...with a 31 spline rear...
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 24, 2008
#15
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #15
Tom - Personally, I would go with an N/A combination in this case for a daily driver.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 25, 2008
#16
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #16
5spd GT said:
Tom - Personally, I would go with an N/A combination in this case for a daily driver.
Click to expand...

IMHO ... As time passes ... David just seems to be posting stuff that becomes
more and more practical

I agree 100%

Tom

I'm gonna tell you something you may not want to hear

As long as you have ONLY your Stang for a DD .....

You would be wise to not go TOO radical with your plans :Word:

Grady
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jan 25, 2008
#17
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #17
I have t tell you guys though.. I had a custom turbo'd miata 4cyl and it rocked out!(started out as wife's car). Having a blown or TC V8 must be rediculous gforce in the drivers seat.
 

Tom95gt

Member
Oct 10, 2007
186
1
19
South Jersey
Jan 25, 2008
#18
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #18
yea i just want some healthy horsepower, enough to kick any honda away because their are that certain few, i emphasize few that are pretty quick and the occasional camaro or trans-am that i see out on the streets and also some personal satisfaction when i'm burnin tires through the gears lol
 

1987Rock

Member
May 2, 2007
114
0
16
Jan 25, 2008
#19
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #19
Since you're wanting driveability, I would go with the blown 306. It will also be a little more fun to drive if you do autocross or open track days cuz it will rev better.
If you want a street/strip, I would go with the 347 for more torque.
Personally, the blown 306 sounds kick a$$ to me
 

95CobraMike

Active Member
Apr 12, 2004
1,046
0
36
Lima OH
Jan 26, 2008
#20
  • Jan 26, 2008
  • #20
do what i did... i vote 306 +h/c/i + vortech!!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Electrical Spark Plugs
  • jimzzilla
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
858
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 28, 2026
jimzzilla
Fuel SN95.0 fuel system
  • RedFury5.0
  • Apr 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
300
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 22, 2025
AeroCoupe
O
New (Old) guy
  • OX1
  • Oct 19, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
9
Views
272
The Welcome Wagon Oct 24, 2025
OX1
O
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
740
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
K
Mustang tire size
  • Konstang
  • Jun 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
164
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2025
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?