What is wrong with this engine? Accelerates like I am pulling a big trailer

oz

Founding Member
Jun 29, 2000
1,079
10
58
Plymouth, MI
I am still fighting with my fresh 302 and am running out of ideas. I am tempted to take it to a mechanic (say it isn't so... I am so ashamed that I can't figure this out!!!)

The thing has very low vacuum at idle (10 inches at 900 rpm) and runs pretty rough. I finally got the car on the road for the first time in a year last weekend and it felt like I was towing a huge trailer. It would not spool up at all.

It has classic symptoms of a retarded cam (low steady vacuum at idle) but engines with retarded cams usually wake up at higher rpms - mine does not.
Everyone I have talked to tell me that this is not likely and that they have never heard of an edelbrock cam or Cloyes timing set that was off more than a degree or two. If I rev up the engine slowly from idle (no load) it is rough to about 2500 rpm and then seems to smooth out a little - although on the road it won't pull at any RPM.

I have a balanced and blueprinted 302 bored +.030", Edelbrock performer RPM cam, intake and 600 CFM carb (Edelbrock Carter AFB). Stock ported heads, screw in studs, full roller rockers, long tube headers, stock rebuilt and recurved distributor (26 deg total advance at ~3600 rpm) with Pertronix ignition and coil, Cloyes timing chain/gears. I spliced around the resistor wire so the coil sees the full 12 volts.

I have tried rebuilding the carb, and a new fuel pump. I have checked the compression (~140 psi cold) and the leak down (all less than 7% cold). I used my inductive timing light to confirm that each plug was firing (placed the pickup on different wires as the engine ran). I sprayed carb cleaner on the intake gaskets to rule out a leak (can't check the side to the block though). I took the (2.25") exhaust pipes off to confirm that the mufflers weren't plugged. The engine ran differently but did not have any more vacuum. I have an old engine analyzer that I use to monitor RPM when I am under the hood and when it is hooked up to the coil the needle jumps around a lot.... as mentioned before, according to the timing light, all cylinders are firing.

I have not tried changing the needles and seats on the carb yet. The carb came off my buddies car that had a very similar setup to mine. It worked great on his car so I have left it as he had it (except for new gaskets, etc). The engine idles best when the idle needles are about 2 turns out (normal) so I don't think it's lean at idle. The mechanic I talked to thought the Carter's were junk and suggested I get a Holley (I have always heard the exact opposite).
It was also suggested that the valves may be to tight (I put 3/4 turn of preload on the hydraulic lifters as perscribed in the instructions but the mechanic I talked to said to back them off the 1/4 turn...). I have started to turn back the valves but have not finished yet. I don't think this is the problem either since the compression and leak down tests were good... and the car does not run worse as it warms (like tight valves would).

What the heck am I missing? :bang: :bang: :bang: :bang: :mad: :shrug:
 
oz said:
It would not spool up at all.


maybe its a bad turbo :shrug:


seriously, sounds like a big vacume leak. a vacume leak such as at the carb gasket or intake gasket will produce a steady low vacume. your cam manufacturer should be able to tell you what your engine should pull for vacume, or if you have desktop dyno that will get you in the ballpark as well. plus you're a little low on the advance if total advance is only 26deg, if that includes 12 deg base timing. you should be at 32 or more total ex. (base 12deg + adv. 20 = 32) i'm running 14+22 = 36.

as far as carbs go both styles are good, i personally like demon's which are like holley's. but the edelbrock's/carter's aren't bad either.
 
Vacuum leaks usually raise the idle though...
Correct if I am wrong.

Maybe he got a cam with the windsor firing order. Worth a try to swap a couple wires.

How did the engine spin when you were building it? Was it smooth and easy to turn?

How did you break in the cam?

What is the oil pressure?

Did you break the engine in for a good long while before applying 'load'?

I ask about the cam break in because improper methods can damage the lobes.
I ask about oil pressure because hydraulic lifters will not lift without enough oil.
I ask about engine break in because this should be done with little/no load for several hours to get the rings seated and to polish in the bearings.
Newly built engines will not make their 'ultimate' power until the rings are seated well and the bearings are polished.
Running too hard before this is accomplished, will seem as though the engine is weak and could make total break in impossible.

I don't know that anything I posted here applies, but just throwing out ideas.
Dave
 
in order -
The distributor has 26 degrees of advance so if I set it at 10 initial I get 36 total... I am at 15 initial just to get it to idle.

Tried 351 firing order... that's not it. it's a 302 cam for sure.

I should have 15 inches of vacuum according to Edelbrock.

Plugged all vacuum ports (including brake booster), no difference.

Engine spun fairly easily when I built it - certainly 'normal' resistance.

Cam break in - 20 minutes at 2000 rpm plus per the instructions, no load.

Oil pressue is good, 3/4 on the stock gage.

After the initial 20 minutes and oil change (no metal in the oil at all - I have a magnetic plug just to make sure) I have been idling it for awhile trying to figure out this problem... probably a good hour of run time before i had it on the road. I have driven it about 4 miles on the road.... that's the only load it's seen. Definitely didn't run it too hard.

I will try the propane idea... I assume I will want to disconnet the PCV - otherwise the gas will get sucked into carb right?...
 
The left side pipe tends to shake quite a bit... so I wonder if one of the runners is sucking in from the crank case?

What's the right way to do this propane trick? I don't want to blow up my garage :D
 
i think you can use carb cleaner and spry it along the sides of teh intake where is meets the head. the engine will run faster if there is a leak b'cuz it will suck in the carb cleaner. plus this won't blow up.......as easily as propane.
 
BlueMonster65 said:
i think you can use carb cleaner and spry it along the sides of teh intake where is meets the head. the engine will run faster if there is a leak b'cuz it will suck in the carb cleaner. plus this won't blow up.......as easily as propane.

You can use carb cleaner but rather than increase rpm it will make it stumble. I always found this to be the easiest way to locate a leak.
 
Electrical Gremlins...?

Well, keep trying things... I tried losening the valves a little (from 3/4 turn past 0 lash to 1/3 turn past 0 lash) and it did no good.

I wonder if I have a weak spark or something... I have kind of taken the distributor for granted since it was rebuilt by Mike Ulrey (the guy that all the Mustang magazines use when they need distributor work). I wonder if I have all the wiring right.... Here's what I have:

Pertronix ignition (red wire to coil +, black wire to coil -)
Flamethrower coil (1.5 ohm internal resistance) wired + to key, bypassing ballast wire (spliced into second wire coming from key cylinder at same terminal as ballast wire), tach wired to - terminal.

I was told at the time that this was the right way to wire a Pertronix with low resistance coil (bypass the ballast wire coming from the key)...

I was planning to start trying different wiring schemes to see if I have jacked up the wiring (I can handle the mechanical stuff but the electrical gives me problems...) since the voltage regulator was wired wrong (according to the service manual) when i took it all apart.

Another problem is that sometimes when I turn the key I hear a click but the engine does not turn over. Is this the starter, wire or solenoid? I would rule out the solenoid but with the key on, engine off the 'I' terminal only carries 9.5 V... Is this right? With the key on 'start', doesn't this feed the coil directly?

Thanks
 
ok, now the "I" terminal's got me wondering on this ... the 9.5v on "I" implies the ballast resistor has some current flow through it.

Yet the wiring as I understand it is bypassing the ballast resistor ... so why would "I" be 9.5v? Shouldn't be unless there's current flow through that resistor, or unless you are measuing "ground" as +2.5v above actual ground e.g., a bad ground in that path?

Can you somewhat recheck your assumptions - for example, by remeasuring voltage at the coil, Pertronix, etc. ... you should see full "12v" there, not 9.5v. And try grounding your meter in a few places or just measure from block to chassis a little and expect a low voltage drop between...

I'm not sure this will fix the problem, though!
 
hmmm... bad ground.... I will check that. Since all these measurements were made relative to the '-' battery terminal they should all be roughly the same as the voltage across the battery - unless there is excess resistance somewhere... I will look into it.

The ballast resistor is definitely bypassed (although the connector was not removed and rests pretty close to the intake manifold - I will put some electrical tape over it for good measure). On my key cylinder switch two wires feed to the same terminal - one is the ballast. I spliced into the 'other wire' on that terminal. I figure that since they share a common terminal they have to be 'hot' at the same time. This wire then goes directly to the positive terminal on the coil.

I am gong to recheck all my grounds (block to body, battery).

Another crazy idea - the Flamethrower coil is slightly smaller diameter than the stock coil so I wrapped electrical tape around it to make up the difference... it does not contact the metal bracket... The body of the coil itself does not have to be grounded, right?

Thanks!
 
I checked the grounds and everything looks good. I have minimal resistance between the body, block and battery. I did not check the wires that go to the dash specifically.

I looked at the starter solenoid a little closer. With the key on, engine off, the wire that feeds the 'I' terminal on the solenoid has 11.6 V if the wire is UNHOOKED from the solenoid. If I hook it up, the voltage drops to 9.75. There was a little spark between the terminal and the wire when I hooked it up... The ballast wire (unused) does the same thing (11.6 V to 9.75 V when the solenoid is unhooked)
Where does the wire that goes to the 'I' terminal get power? I spliced around the ballast wire and went directly to the coil but does is feed the 'I' terminal on the solenoid also?
Does this seem normal? I changed the starter last night (after confirming that it was getting 12V through the cable in start mode. There is still a problem... I got one start and then the solenoid clicked when I turned the key and nothing happened.... then I tried again and didn't even get a click. When I looked at the solenoid I got close to the terminal that goes to the starter and it shocked me even though the key was off by this time.
I'm thinking changing the solenoid might be a good idea but I'm pretty sure it is not the cause of the original problem this thread was about.

Thanks!
 
Maybe your two problems are related in some way as it sounds like there is interaction involving "I" that should not be. As I understand it, "I" on the starter relay forces unballasted +12v to the coil when the starter is engaged, bypassing the ballast resistor.

With the starter not engaged "I" should be an open circuit with respect to the starter relay itself. The fact you see the voltage drop and get a spark means there is current flow into the "I" terminal.

If you disconnect "I" completely, and try things, is anything different or better? If your intent with the Pertronix was to bypass the ballast resistor then "I" has no role at all in a properly wired system.

Otherwise a new starter relay is cheap. If you have access to a known good relay measure resistance from "I" to ground (relay mounting plate) with nothing connected to "I" ... compare.
 
pa0101,
To clarify, since the connector slips over the post, I am able to check the voltage with the 'I' wire connected and disconnected. With the key on, engine off there is about 9.7 V at the terminal (with the brown wire attached). If I leave the key on and pull the connector off 'I' the voltage increases to 11.5 at both the end that connects to the 'I' terminal and at the end of the ballast wire under hood (not used in this setup). The 'I' terminal on the soleniod carries no voltage with the brown wire removed (since the brown wire is hot with key on). It does seem that the solenoid has a load when the key is on based on the fact that the voltage drops. I can't think of any reason for this. The interior lights dim a bit when the key is turned on but I assume that is due to the draw of the tachometer and the electric choke on the carb - both of which are wired to switched 12 V. The choke goes to the 'I' terminal on the solenoid and the tach is wired under the dash. Removing the choke wire from the 'I terminal did not seem to do anything to the voltage.
Hmmm.. since the choke is controlled by the 'I' terminal and it is aperantly not seeing full voltage is there any chance this is causing my poor idle (choke somehow bleeding air through the housing, etc.)?

Thanks!