• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

What it takes to beat a 98T/A in a GT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1995formy
  • Start date Start date Feb 1, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
1

1995formy

New Member
Feb 1, 2004
3
0
0
Feb 1, 2004
#1
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #1
HI, I have a 95 formula but looking to upgrade.I have almost decided to get a 98 model but im also interested in mustangs.I would like to get a cobra but they are out of my price range.How much $$$ would it take to make 2000 gt as fast as a 98 TA?
 
1

1995formy

New Member
Feb 1, 2004
3
0
0
Feb 1, 2004
#2
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #2
Nevermind it looks like to me by reading other posts it wouldnt be worth it so ill stick with the TA.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Feb 1, 2004
#3
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #3
it would not take that much. depends on how you want to go about it. 98 t/a's only run 13's. I would think you could make a 99gt wax a 98 t/a for less money. guess it depends on what kind of deal you get on the car.

I know new a mustang was a better deal. supercharged gt takes a stock t/a. t/a was like 3k+ more.
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Feb 1, 2004
#4
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #4
I see it this way, I like the mustang interior a lot better than a '98 TA's plus it's got fewer miles, a better engine IMO and it looks better. It's your choice but the 99+ GTs aren't slow by any means.
 

KaPPaBaLL

New Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,326
0
0
BAYAREA
Feb 2, 2004
#5
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #5
1995formy said:
HI, I have a 95 formula but looking to upgrade.I have almost decided to get a 98 model but im also interested in mustangs.I would like to get a cobra but they are out of my price range.How much $$$ would it take to make 2000 gt as fast as a 98 TA?
Click to expand...

buy a 98 T/A and mod that fugger.
 
M

MustangLife

Active Member
Jan 5, 2003
1,285
0
36
Chattanooga, TN
Feb 2, 2004
#6
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #6
A 98 TA in bone stock form should get a 13.00 with a good driver. Most people who have a 98 trans am are not stock. Ls1 owners love to put the giggle gas on there cars. I know 3 guys pretty good who have ls1 cars. One is putting 543 rwhp to the ground on the spray, one is 493 rwhp on the spray, and the other i'm not sure but runs low 10's in the 1/4 on spray. N/A 4.6vs. N/A ls1 = ls1, spray 4.6 vs/ sprayed ls1 = ls1 is gonna win. There just to strong of a engine and the stock short block can handle up like 600rwhp.

Josh
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Feb 2, 2004
#7
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #7
the extra displacement sure helps plus they got the best drivetrain components in chevy's parts bin. Looking at the sticker price, you can see why they're not around right now.
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Feb 2, 2004
#8
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #8
1995formy said:
HI, I have a 95 formula but looking to upgrade.I have almost decided to get a 98 model but im also interested in mustangs.I would like to get a cobra but they are out of my price range.How much $$$ would it take to make 2000 gt as fast as a 98 TA?
Click to expand...

stock t/a? I aint scared.

MustangLife said:
A 98 TA in bone stock form should get a 13.00 with a good driver. Most people who have a 98 trans am are not stock. Ls1 owners love to put the giggle gas on there cars. I know 3 guys pretty good who have ls1 cars. One is putting 543 rwhp to the ground on the spray, one is 493 rwhp on the spray, and the other i'm not sure but runs low 10's in the 1/4 on spray. N/A 4.6vs. N/A ls1 = ls1, spray 4.6 vs/ sprayed ls1 = ls1 is gonna win. There just to strong of a engine and the stock short block can handle up like 600rwhp.

Josh
Click to expand...



that is a load of ****. Only a hand full of F body's have ran 12s stock. They were probably on a awesome track and had perfect conditions. I have a friend with a 1le and the only reason he is in 12s is because his car is stripped. Those myths of ls1's running 12s stock, or do to the fact they have awesome tracks and perfect conditions. Also, you cant compare times that much to other states. Its like comparing Florida to Colorado, its not fair.

They do not all run 12s, most run mid 13s stock at any average track.

600rwhp on a stock aluminum block, that is a big risk without new sleeves and other better components. Their heads however will flow that much HP and more.
 

GTvert01

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
636
0
0
West Plains, MO
Feb 2, 2004
#9
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #9
I agree, and that's if you can find somebody that can actually drive one.I ran 13.08@108 in my girlfriend's stock 02 SS. The owner of the track wanted to tear the car apart over a $10 trophy.No other F-bodies were running anywhere near those times.Most were in the mid to high 13s.She just got a good one and has never had it over 80mph.I hate driving it, but it is fast.
 

GTvert01

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
636
0
0
West Plains, MO
Feb 2, 2004
#10
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #10
Oh yeah, and it was perfect weather and track conditions
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Feb 2, 2004
#11
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #11
I have only ran at a track that does not prep it, AT ALL. They only put THC(is that right?) when the drag cars are there. Other than that, nothing. Im still running low 13s but if I was at a stickier track, I bet I could hit a high 12.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Feb 2, 2004
#12
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #12
LS1s are faster than 4.6s. LS1s with a few mods will run 12s (LID, catback and Drs).

I say get the LS1, they are some of the best motors from the factory, and have great potential, minus the rear!
 

GTvert01

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
636
0
0
West Plains, MO
Feb 2, 2004
#13
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #13
mogs01gt said:
They only put THC(is that right?)
Click to expand...
Why would they put weed on the track?
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Feb 2, 2004
#14
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #14
OPPPS, LMAO



damn it WTF is the **** Im talking about.
 

GTvert01

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
636
0
0
West Plains, MO
Feb 2, 2004
#15
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #15
Vht ?
 

MotleyCrue

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
124
0
0
Cedar Falls, IA
Feb 2, 2004
#16
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #16
GTvert01 said:
Why would they put weed on the track?
Click to expand...



HAHAHAH
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Feb 2, 2004
#17
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #17
GTvert01 said:
Vht ?
Click to expand...


yep thanks lol Im retarded. Damn it Im tired and hungry. leave me alone.
 

gruntman31

Founding Member
Apr 22, 2002
624
0
0
Colorado Springs, Co
Feb 2, 2004
#18
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #18
There is a viable alternative to an LS1.....Mach 1. Stock for stock the Mach's are as fast if not faster than LS1's. Plus, they are way way way cooler.
 

GTvert01

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
636
0
0
West Plains, MO
Feb 2, 2004
#19
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #19
Yeah, and isn't this stangnet? Why would you suggest someone buy a f-body over a mustang?
 

NitroDuck

I put out on the 1st date
Founding Member
Aug 17, 1999
4,406
0
66
Baltimore, MD
Feb 2, 2004
#20
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #20
There's no doubt that only the best drivers at good tracks get the awesome numbers (high 12s) out of stock LS1s, but the fact still remains that they vastly overpower stock GTs. Stock GTs dyno 220-230rwhp, while stock LS1s are dynoing 290-300rwhp. Even if the driver of the LS1 isn't the most skilled racer he'll still have at least a 50rwhp margin of error.

If you're looking for all out speed get the T/A, but I'd suggest driving the Mustang and seeing how you like it. I personally prefer driving the Mustang.

mogs01gt said:
stock t/a? I aint scared.





that is a load of ****. Only a hand full of F body's have ran 12s stock. They were probably on a awesome track and had perfect conditions. I have a friend with a 1le and the only reason he is in 12s is because his car is stripped. Those myths of ls1's running 12s stock, are do to the fact they have awesome tracks and perfect conditions. Also, you cant compare times that much to other states. Its like comparing Florida to Colorado, its not fair.

They do not all run 12s, most run mid 13s stock at any average track.

600rwhp on a stock aluminum block, that is a big risk without new sleeves and other better components. Their heads however will flow that much HP and more.
Click to expand...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Procharger install/prep questions
  • ahratrew
  • Nov 22, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
379
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 26, 2025
Noobz347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
767
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
710
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
223
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
659
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?