• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

SN95 What Size Injectors Should I Run

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karri94gt
  • Start date Start date Mar 25, 2017

Karri94gt

New Member
Mar 25, 2017
8
0
1
Mar 25, 2017
#1
  • Mar 25, 2017
  • #1
What size injectors should I run. 306 stock ho cam, cantfield 192cc heads,track heat intake,1 3/4 " headers, 75mm TB,76mm maf, msd ignition, 150 shot plate kit, 255lph boost pump
 

Karri94gt

New Member
Mar 25, 2017
8
0
1
Mar 26, 2017
#2
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #2
Karri94gt said:
What size injectors should I run. 306 stock ho cam, cantfield 192cc heads,track heat intake,1 3/4 " headers, 75mm TB,76mm maf, msd ignition, 150 shot plate kit, 255lph boost pump
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • 13417014_10154146886478672_3024982923417519764_o.webp
    95.3 KB · Views: 348

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Mar 26, 2017
#3
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #3
Well the nitrous system should supply its own fuel so you just need to supply for the motor. I would think 24's should work. You're combo is probably around 260 rwhp n/a supply needs to match that area. If you want to make sure go up to 30's(overkill but can be tuned to work).
 
Reactions: mikestang63

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Mar 26, 2017
#4
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #4
as always solid advice from Todd.

To the OP, hope you dont mind me asking but can you tell me a little more why/who chose the combination? Not to tear it apart, but it appears to be a lot of mismatched parts- stock cam, 75mm TB, 1 3/4 headers... track heat intake...

You're giving up a lot of low end imo.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Mar 26, 2017
#5
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #5
Fuel injector sizing & injector photos

Revised 26-Dec-2014 to add statement about figures are for flywheel HP and not rear wheel HP

Injector HP ratings: this flywheel HP, not rear wheel HP.
Divide flow rating by.5 and multiply the result by the number of injectors. This uses a 100% duty cycle. These ratings are for naturally aspirated engines at the flywheel.

Example:
19/.5 = 38, 38 x 8 = 304 HP
24/.5 = 48, 48 x 8 = 384 HP
30/.5 = 60, 60 x 8 = 480 HP
36/.5 = 72, 72 x 8 = 576 HP
42/.5 = 84, 84 x 8 = 672 HP

The preferred duty cycle is about 85% maximum, so for a safety factor multiply the final figure times .85.

19/.5 = 38, 38 x 8 = 304 HP x .85 = 258 HP
24/.5 = 48, 48 x 8 = 384 HP x .85 = 326 HP
30/.5 = 60, 60 x 8 = 480 HP x .85 = 408 HP
36/.5 = 72, 72 x 8 = 576 HP x .85 = 490 HP
42/.5 = 84, 84 x 8 = 672 HP x .85 = 571 HP

Remember that the above ratings are at 39 PSI. Increasing the pressure will effectively increase the flow rating. Example: a 19 lb injector will flow 24 lbs at 63 PSI, and a 24 lb injector will flow 30 lbs at 63 PSI.

See http://users.erols.com/srweiss/calcpchg.htm to get the calculators used in these examples.


Here's the duty cycle explanation. Duty cycle is how much of the time the intake is open the injectors are turned on. The 85% figure means that for 85% of the time the intake valve is open, the injectors are spraying. The idea is that you want some percentage of the duty cycle left over so that you have some room to grow the process.

If you are at 100% and you need more fuel, all you can do is turn up the fuel pressure. That means the whole fuel curve from idle to WOT is affected. Maybe you are already too rich at idle, and turning up the fuel pressure makes it worse. If you had some injector duty cycle left to play with, a custom tune could use that where it is needed. That would not over richen the whole range from idle to WOT.

If you did turn up the fuel pressure, you might be able to change the injector duty cycle to get the air/fuel mixture ratio you want since the injectors will have extra fuel delivery capability.

With larger than stock injectors or higher that stock fuel pressure, you will need an aftermarket MAF that matches the injector size. The MAF “lies” to the computer to get a fuel delivery schedule that meets the engine’s needs and isn’t too rich or too lean. The best strategy is an aftermarket MAF and a custom tune to insure the best air/fuel ratio over all the RPM range.

Don't forget to increase the fuel pump size when you increase injector size or significantly increase the fuel pressure



Diagram courtesy of Tmoss & Stang&2birds


See the following website for some help from Tmoss (diagram designer) & Stang&2Birds (website host) for help on 88-95 wiring http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/ Everyone should bookmark this site.

Ignition switch wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/IgnitionSwitchWiring.gif

Fuel, alternator, A/C and ignition wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/fuel-alt-links-ign-ac.gif

Complete computer, actuator & sensor wiring diagram for 88-91 Mass Air Mustangs
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/88-91_5.0_EEC_Wiring_Diagram.gif

Vacuum diagram 89-93 Mustangs
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/mustangFoxFordVacuumDiagram.jpg

HVAC vacuum diagram
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/Mustang_AC_heat_vacuum_controls.gif

TFI module differences & pinout
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/TFI_5.0_comparison.gif

Fuse box layout
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/MustangFuseBox.gif
 

Karri94gt

New Member
Mar 25, 2017
8
0
1
Mar 26, 2017
#6
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #6
mikestang63 said:
as always solid advice from Todd.

To the OP, hope you dont mind me asking but can you tell me a little more why/who chose the combination? Not to tear it apart, but it appears to be a lot of mismatched parts- stock cam, 75mm TB, 1 3/4 headers... track heat intake...

You're giving up a lot of low end imo.
Click to expand...
 

Karri94gt

New Member
Mar 25, 2017
8
0
1
Mar 26, 2017
#7
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #7
It's what I had at the time. What would you change?
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Mar 26, 2017
#8
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #8
Karri94gt said:
It's what I had at the time. What would you change?
Click to expand...

well. we are all experts at spending other people's money...lol

First tell us more about your car, your engine, other components , your goal, use case, and budget. There are plenty of guys here who have done it many times over and can help.
 

Karri94gt

New Member
Mar 25, 2017
8
0
1
Mar 26, 2017
#9
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #9
94 GT auto 4:11 gears, 306 flat tops,192cc heads ,60cc chamber,2.02-1.60 valves stock .444 lift 260° cam,TFS track heat intake with plate kit, full Mac exhaust 1 3/4 headers to 2.5" pro chamber to tail pipe, bbk 75 mm TB bbk 76mm maf ,295/55r15 drag radials car is weekends and track car. Would like 300-350 rwhp n/a
 
Last edited: Mar 28, 2017

Karri94gt

New Member
Mar 25, 2017
8
0
1
Mar 26, 2017
#10
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #10
1.6 roller rockers
 

Karri94gt

New Member
Mar 25, 2017
8
0
1
Mar 26, 2017
#11
  • Mar 26, 2017
  • #11
Want to be close to 7.5s 1/8ths. All help is appreciated
 
Last edited: Mar 27, 2017
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Mar 28, 2017
#12
  • Mar 28, 2017
  • #12
The .5 figure in jrichker's equation indicates an assumed brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) of 1/2 gallon of fuel to make 1 horsepower for 1 hour.
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Mar 28, 2017
#13
  • Mar 28, 2017
  • #13
Karri94gt said:
94 GT auto 4:11 gears, 306 flat tops,192cc heads ,60cc chamber,2.02-1.60 valves stock .444 lift 260° cam,TFS track heat intake with plate kit, full Mac exhaust 1 3/4 headers to 2.5" pro chamber to tail pipe, bbk 75 mm TB bbk 76mm maf car is weekends and track car. Would like 300-350 rwhp n/a
Click to expand...
You need more cam to get to and over 300rwhp(you need to be able move more air). If you want to wait on a camshaft change,just take it to the track and get a baseline. Suspension,chassis,and tires are where you need to concentrate. With you running nitrous I don't know why you shouldn't be able to run that number as is. Depending on how much you are spraying you could see around 450whp.
 

Karri94gt

New Member
Mar 25, 2017
8
0
1
Mar 28, 2017
#14
  • Mar 28, 2017
  • #14
A5literMan said:
You need more cam to get to and over 300rwhp(you need to be able move more air). If you want to wait on a camshaft change,just take it to the track and get a baseline. Suspension,chassis,and tires are where you need to concentrate. With you running nitrous I don't know why you shouldn't be able to run that number as is. Depending on how much you are spraying you could see around 450whp.
Click to expand...
A5literMan said:
You need more cam to get to and over 300rwhp(you need to be able move more air). If you want to wait on a camshaft change,just take it to the track and get a baseline. Suspension,chassis,and tires are where you need to concentrate. With you running nitrous I don't know why you shouldn't be able to run that number as is. Depending on how much you are spraying you could see around 450whp.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the input was what I was looking for
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,079
2,680
224
Vass, NC
Apr 1, 2017
#15
  • Apr 1, 2017
  • #15
My rule of thumb is based on what I've seen from OEMs. The stock mustangs made about 190-200 rwhp, and came with 19lbs/hr. The Cobra came with 235 rwhp and came with 24 lbs/hr injectors. The LS1s came with 29 lbs/hr injectors. I see a trend of ~1lbs/hr injectors for every 10 rwhp. It's just a rule of thumb, but it will work for you. 24s to 30s in your case.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
376
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
228
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
692
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
539
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?