• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

What to do first, H/C/I or single turbo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveB
  • Start date Start date Jan 26, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

SWYZ721

Member
Aug 24, 2004
208
0
16
Ann Arbor, MI
Feb 14, 2006
#21
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #21
This is really what I would do as well, Turbo now, and then save for your new long block.

Once you've got the Beef'd up new block and rotating assembly, THEN choose your HCI (might need 185s at that point, or something different, you never know), then your trans, then your rear end.

Turbo it now, because otherwise you never will, most who "build-up" with bolt-ons and the like, in preparation for the boost, usually never go through with it.
 

Cobra4075

Founding Member
Feb 18, 2002
286
1
17
Tinley Park, IL
Feb 14, 2006
#22
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #22
Talk to a turbo builder. He'll tell you exactly what is ideal for their kit. So you're not buying parts twice. Either way you go, you're going to be tearing it down to the head gaskets. I went HCI and now I'm going turbo. Everything depends on what your ideal goals are for the car. I know a stroked dart block is in my future. Talk to Ivan at www.turbotimepsi.com. He's knows his stuff and his kits make big power on stock bottem ends.
 

94gts

Member
Jul 4, 2004
873
0
16
Carmel, New York
Feb 14, 2006
#23
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #23
even though i was so close to turbocharging my car, i decided againts it due to all the additional costs involved. Plus, i *could* have blown up anything at any moment and at this point in my life i cant have that. down the road after school i will build a ridiculous dart based, t-76 powered, stick car
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Feb 14, 2006
#24
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #24
yellow5.0cobra said:
I guess i'll just sum it all up for you, go turbo and forget about it.
Click to expand...
There ya have it.
I had a H/C/I car with nitrous. It was fun. But if I knew then, what I knew now, I'd never bought the nitrous kit. And if I knew it even farther back, probably never woulda got the H/C/I/. Since you can split the block with stock ford iron.
 
G

gatorbytes2

New Member
May 1, 2005
26
0
0
Magnolia Delaware
Feb 14, 2006
#25
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #25
In my humble opinion,
MY train of thought is as follows,
By the turbo FIRST,it gets a lump sum payment out of the way, and it will give you the gains right off the bat, (instant satisfaction) so to speak.. If tuned PROPERLY and i emphasive on PROPERLY! (detonation kills motors not power adders...) you shouldnt have TOO many problems, but know... that there is an element of risk with ANY power adder.

Then start saving your money to build a REAL motor...
think about it... If you just buy heads/cam/intake... then 6 months later add a turbo, without bolstering your bottom end, your gonna feel PRETTY BAD if you throw a rod/piston up through those high dollar (3000$ plus investment) aluminum heads/intake.

Where as you can pretty much throw on the turbo with a GOOD TUNE!!! and have a good time... if something does let loose... your only out a stock motor..

when you do decide to build a motor, do it right... forged crank/rods/pistons THEN add your $$$ heads/intake/cam that matches YOUR specific application.

what runs great on an N/A car wont necessarily be what you want for a power adder car, especially one as versitile and potent as a turbo.

p.s. one more thing to think about, with more power comes the need for supporting hardware- Tranny that can withstand high torque/upgraded clutch/ beefed up rear/axles/boost controlers/ignition upgrades/fuel upgrades
then you have to be able to "put the power to the ground" which means better tires/suspension upgrades....

It can be a viscious cycle of breakages if you arent careful.. but can be alot of fun too as long as your patient and spend your $$$ wisely.:SNSign:
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Feb 15, 2006
#26
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #26
turbo

thats what im doing. no more money going to mods(i didnt spend any yet since i bought the car this way)for the motor/exhaust.
 

rio95

Member
Nov 18, 2003
829
1
17
Grand Rapids, MI
Feb 15, 2006
#27
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #27
mo_dingo said:
Running 400HP on the stock block is asking for engine problems. 8PSI will get you 320 rwhp. H/C/I will get you 320rwhp.

With the h/c/i, you will have a completely brand spanking new top end. Which means you don't have to worry about valves/springs/head gaskets blowing. The only major problem is that your bottom end could go.

With a turbo, you have stock everything, so you could blow anything on your engine. The injectors/fuel pump/MAF will be new (usually), but those aren't major components.

So if it's a daily driver, with above 50k on the longblock, I personally would get a h/c/i combo. Money ends up being the same, but dependability is increased 10-fold w/ the h/c/i. But that's JMO.
Scott
Click to expand...


First of all, 8psi should be right at about 370 at the wheels. Much more than HCI.

I say turbo all the way and here is why:

1. A trubo will make way more power, plus it would make enough power at 10-14 psi to harm the block, therefore maybe you would just stick with the stock heads for good.

2. The most important reason is so that you would not have to buy a MAF, injectors etc. twice. For a HCI you would want 24-30 lb injectors and a turbo would be 42-50lb. You would most likely run a different MAF also. So it will cost you more in the long run and why do it all twice??

3. There was a comment about the hassle of taking the turbo stuff off to put h/c/i on if you went turbo first. I completely do NOT agree with that as being a concern. I can take my turbo stuff off in about an hour. Even better, last week, I took all my turbo stuff off, tore the motor down to JUST the shortblock sitting in the engine bay, to having the car running again with the turbo completely back on in about 12 hours. That is no more than a weekend job if you are at all capable.

4. Another major thing to think about if the tune. You would most likely need a tune after each, so keep that in mind.

5. Most importantly, turbos are SWEET!

DISCLAMER:

PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THOUGH, THAT IF YOU ARE NOT CAPABLE OF DOING THIS STUFF ON YOUR OWN, NOT ONLY DO I NOT RECOMMEND GOING TURBO FIRST, I WOULD NOT DO IT "EVER". JOE IS RIGHT ABOUT RELIABILITY, BUT THAT IS SOMETHING YOU HAVE TO DETERMINE ON YOUR OWN.


p.s. I would try that clutch before getting a new one. It should hold up to 5-8 psi alright on street tires. The tranny probably won't though (T5).
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
262
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
273
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
81
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
S
I don know what im doing!
  • Sha_lala_pookie
  • May 5, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
560
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 11, 2025
Sha_lala_pookie
S
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
903
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?