• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

what valve springs to get?

  • Thread starter Thread starter moneypit94
  • Start date Start date Apr 15, 2004

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Apr 15, 2004
#1
  • Apr 15, 2004
  • #1
I have to change the valve springs in the 205's so i can run a hydro. roller cam. Anybody know what springs would work well.. Im looking for a max lift of at least .600 I see that Trickflow sells an upgrade set for there heads. Would they work i wonder?

Im going with a hydro roller cam because the cam is cheaper, i already have hydro roller lifters, and i don't want to mess with adjusting the valves all the time.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Apr 15, 2004
#2
  • Apr 15, 2004
  • #2
Comp Cams 26918
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Apr 16, 2004
#3
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #3
I don't think the Trick Flow springs would be enough. Talk to Ed C, he hooked me up with some springs a couple weeks ago.
 

95stocker

New Member
Mar 25, 2003
236
0
0
Rochester
Apr 16, 2004
#4
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #4
I agree with HairyCanary, I'm running Comp Cams springs and couldn't be happier
 

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Apr 16, 2004
#5
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #5
Plans have changed... I thought i was going to win those heads on ebay and didn't... But i did call up Jegs and asked about there new heads with the 2.10 and 1.60 valves.. They aren't due in till the end of the month but im going to order a set of them... They are supposed to out-flow everythign on the market and i will get them set up for a hydrolic roller lifter cam.

I am going to do some more research on them before i buy though. I guess the onlything you need are special vavle covers..
 

swingline

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
1,252
0
0
TCB - Taking Care of Business
Apr 16, 2004
#6
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #6
My buddy told me about those new Jeg's heads. They are supposed to be monsters.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Apr 16, 2004
#7
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #7
You've got to run a stronger spring because the hydraulic lifter cam has a more aggressive ramp rate, which is more violent on the springs, causing the springs to not be able to control the valves, and they start to float.

After a quick search, I found that the springs that come on the 205 heads have 210 lbs. of pressure at the seat, with a maximum lift of .670". I was under the impression that 210 lbs. of pressure was more than enough for a hydraulic lifter camshaft. I'm probably wrong. I would talk to Ed about what you need. Probably something with 250 lbs. of pressure at the seat?

Joe
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Apr 16, 2004
#8
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #8
Damn 200 lbs... that's a fair amount. The 26918 springs would still out-rev those by 750 RPM or more.

Dave
 

Jerry Leaming

Member
Nov 2, 2003
477
2
18
Olympia Wa
Apr 16, 2004
#9
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #9
Joe, Its the other way around. Solid cams get more seat and open pressure. The hydraulic roller will collapse with that much seat pressure. The most you should run would be 160 at the seat and I think 350 open. And I would call comp cams and tell them what your doing and they will hook you up. I recently changed my AFR 185 springs to the beehive comp cams spring. My motor now revs past 5800.

Jerry
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Apr 16, 2004
#10
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #10
Jerry Leaming said:
I recently changed my AFR 185 springs to the beehive comp cams spring. My motor now revs past 5800.
Click to expand...
Did you catch the MM&FF article by David Vizard? Comparing the 26918 beehive springs to the traditional 927's (I *think* that was the part#, don't have the article in front of me), the 26918's out-revved the 927's by 1000 RPM. He then went on to experiement with higher spring pressures, to see what it would take to equal the RPM ability of the 26918's, and found that the best he could do was increase the limit by 250 RPM, the 26918's still won by 750 RPM.... awesome!

Dave
 

Jerry Leaming

Member
Nov 2, 2003
477
2
18
Olympia Wa
Apr 16, 2004
#11
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #11
Yes I did, That is what prompted my change to beehives and the fact that the AFR early springs suck A$$. I floated bad enough to break a valve spring shim. Found that part in a oil change hanging to my magnetic plug. Man what a difference, the car not only rans and revs better it also is a ton less noisy when idling. I am very happy with them so far I guess only time wil tell about there longevity.

Jerry
 

Redsnk95

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
2,243
1
0
Houston, TX
Apr 17, 2004
#12
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #12
Joes95GT said:
You've got to run a stronger spring because the hydraulic lifter cam has a more aggressive ramp rate, which is more violent on the springs, causing the springs to not be able to control the valves, and they start to float.

After a quick search, I found that the springs that come on the 205 heads have 210 lbs. of pressure at the seat, with a maximum lift of .670". I was under the impression that 210 lbs. of pressure was more than enough for a hydraulic lifter camshaft. I'm probably wrong. I would talk to Ed about what you need. Probably something with 250 lbs. of pressure at the seat?

Joe
Click to expand...

Joe, those are the specs for the solid roller springs. From AFR the 205s/225s come set-up for solid roller camshaft...

Troy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
256
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
850
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
552
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
Engine Finishing up 331 build
  • RedFury5.0
  • Mar 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
608
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 20, 2025
RedFury5.0
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
130
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?