• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

What would i gain by going to 1.7 Roller rockers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bloopbloob
  • Start date Start date Oct 24, 2007

bloopbloob

Member
Sep 27, 2006
578
4
16
Alberta
Oct 24, 2007
#1
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #1
just like the title states, What would i gain by going to 1.7 Roller rockers? P&P heads, stock cam, stock intake (other mods in sig). is it worth it right now or is money spent better elsewhere? i think i know a fair bit about the 5.0 basics, but a lot of the top end stuff is new to me. is there much benefit to go from stock to 1.7 RR's with a stock cam?
 

samickguy15

Member
Sep 1, 2005
404
0
16
Delavan, IL
Oct 24, 2007
#2
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #2
I would run 1.6's. If you can get the 1.7's cheap enough then get them. If it comes down to it you could always re-sell them. By putting the 1.7's on your stock setup it would be similar to having the smallest Motorsports cam. It will net about .500 lift which will help your combo breath. It's also cheap and gains a few HP from friction loss if you go roller.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Oct 24, 2007
#3
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #3
Good post Samick, the only thing I have ever noticed about 1.7 is they give you a little more RPM up top, but they take that good bottom end grunt away. So if your geared steep do it if not you will problably be upset. They are a cheap way to help out the restrictive stock exhaust ports but you have that covered already. For the money you would have in a set you could buy a cheap motorsport cam and get a real performance improvement you could feel.
 

jspagna1

Member
Jan 23, 2007
53
0
6
Connecticut
Oct 24, 2007
#4
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #4
If you can pick them up cheap, I would get them. And when you do get a Motorsport cam for the car, you will be that much better off.
I was thinking of going to a bigger cam for my car and the tech guys at Mustangs Unlimited told me to save my money and just go to 1.7 RR's. Although this was also the time when I was going to aluminum heads.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 24, 2007
#5
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #5
1.7 rockers arent going to net you much at all in the SOTP performance dept. You will hardly notice a difference. Your exhaust note may change just slightly and the engine may run slightly smoother.

with that being said they are an excellent modification and i consider them a must on a performance car. If you can get a good deal go for it. The install be very straight forward. Make sure you order the 10 dollar shim kit with them! good luck
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Oct 24, 2007
#6
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #6
good info so far, i agree with ninety15.0's post completely. also, they wont net you .500 lift. it will bring it up from .444 to .471 though, which is pretty close to the same LIFT as the B cam, but duration, lobe seperation and so forth is still different/lower so it won't really sound or act like a B cam. i have them on my car, and i like them....but they are noisy and it drives me crazy! and definitely make sure you get a shim kit if you get them.
 

samickguy15

Member
Sep 1, 2005
404
0
16
Delavan, IL
Oct 24, 2007
#7
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #7
cenok is family said:
they wont net you .500 lift. it will bring it up from .444 to .471 though
Click to expand...

IIRC, the stock rockers are 1.5:1. The 1.7:1 will yield .503 lift. A 1.6:1 will yield .474. Now if the stockers were 1.6:1 with a .444 (lift @ valve w/1.6) cam and you switched to 1.7:1 you would have .472 lift.
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Oct 24, 2007
#8
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #8
samickguy15 said:
IIRC, the stock rockers are 1.5:1. The 1.7:1 will yield .503 lift. A 1.6:1 will yield .474. Now if the stockers were 1.6:1 with a .444 (lift @ valve w/1.6) cam and you switched to 1.7:1 you would have .472 lift.
Click to expand...

everything you just said is correct, but i always thought/been told stockers were 1.6's, just non roller. i know cheby's have 1.5's from the factory...
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 24, 2007
#9
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #9
Stock rockers are 1.58...so basically they are a 1.6. So if you do the proportion you would be looking at (.444 x 1.7) / 1.6 = .47175
 

samickguy15

Member
Sep 1, 2005
404
0
16
Delavan, IL
Oct 24, 2007
#10
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #10
I see...I was thinking the stockers were the 1.5's. I stand corrected.
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Oct 24, 2007
#11
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #11
stock is 1.6.... You will get some gains from the 1.7's extra lift and such because your cam is stock, but most of the gain will come from the fact that they are roller rockers. I've got 1.7's on mine and I like them, but you have to be careful that they will not cause the pushrods to rub on your head castings, because the 1.7 brings the pushrod closer to the valve.
 
F

FastSVO

Founding Member
Jun 28, 1999
193
3
18
Los Angeles
Oct 25, 2007
#12
  • Oct 25, 2007
  • #12
What would happen if you didn't have the shim kit? Mine are noisy and I have never popped the valve cover to take a look why....can the VC's be removed w/o taking the upper intake off?
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Oct 25, 2007
#13
  • Oct 25, 2007
  • #13
FastSVO said:
What would happen if you didn't have the shim kit? Mine are noisy and I have never popped the valve cover to take a look why....can the VC's be removed w/o taking the upper intake off?
Click to expand...

if you bought the rocker arms new, they should have come with a shim kit. not all rocker arms will need a shim, but if one does and you don't have any, you won't have the proper preload for that lifter. and no, you have to take the upper off to remove the valve covers.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 26, 2007
#14
  • Oct 26, 2007
  • #14
Yup the upper has to come off....only takes about 10 minutes. Its better to just leave the TB/EGR spacer all attached to the upper and pull it off together. Then you just need to take off the vac lines, undo the 6 upper intake bolts and snap off the throttle cable. real quick
 
F

FastSVO

Founding Member
Jun 28, 1999
193
3
18
Los Angeles
Oct 26, 2007
#15
  • Oct 26, 2007
  • #15
Thanks guys...I'll have to tear it open and take a look.

Are the 1.7 rockers known to kill the stock valvesprings overtime (Like since the early 90's)?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
919
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
204
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Engine adjust roller rockers on new 393
  • maxine-70
  • Dec 27, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 30, 2023
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?