• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

What Would It Take For 800 Horsies

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pops Fun
  • Start date Start date May 28, 2013

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
May 28, 2013
#1
  • May 28, 2013
  • #1
Hi
Hope everyone is well and having a great summer.
Thinking of upping the horsepower again, thought 800 is a nice number!! At this point I am on the fence not sure why I am going to upgrade. Because I can??? Bragging rights??

Wondering what it would take, my son says a custom cam would get me pretty close. He says drivability would suffer though.
Anyway here is what I have and looking for suggestions.

Now have 623rwhp

3/17/2012
347 Ci
Dart block SHP
8.5 to 1 Compression Ratio
Dyno Tuned SCT Chip
TFS TW Heads ported
Systemax Intake Ported
Intake Spacer 1" inch
Vortech V-2 SQ With 2.85 Pulley
Anderson Power Pipe
Maxflow bypass valve
Snow Water Meth 2 Stage
75mm T/B
MAF SCT Big Mouth BA 3000
60# injectors
Steeda 19 Cam
H&S 1.72 Roller Rockers
MSD 6al
Glenns Performance fuel rails
Glenns Performance Dual Walbro sys (1000 hp)
JBA ceramic coated Shorty Headers
Dynomax Ultra Flo SS Exhaust
Mac Hi-flow cats
Spec 3+ Clutch
TKO 600
 

Attachments

  • NomethMeth2_13_12sm.webp
    42.3 KB · Views: 250

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
May 28, 2013
#2
  • May 28, 2013
  • #2
Can't seem to post this in the above post..

http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj22/Popsfun/2012/Dyno_Feb_ 2012/NomethMeth2_13_12sm.jpg
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
May 28, 2013
#3
  • May 28, 2013
  • #3
Victor EFI intake or box type upper or go with the 90 degree elbow on a 4 barrel intake conversion.

Custom camshaft should really improve things over your current Steeda 19.

A NOS or similar system will get you there easily.

Sell the Vortech and go turbo.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
May 28, 2013
#4
  • May 28, 2013
  • #4
+1 on the Turbo. It's going to be really hard to push the blower any farther or get the engine to breath enough to get that power. The bottom line is that the blower you have will only flow so much air.

Kurt
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
May 28, 2013
#5
  • May 28, 2013
  • #5
time for a ysi!
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
May 28, 2013
#6
  • May 28, 2013
  • #6
if you lose driveability with a custom cam, you went with the wrong cam grinder! Call Ed at FTI
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
May 29, 2013
#7
  • May 29, 2013
  • #7
+1 on either a turbo or an upgrade to a bigger blower. That S-Trim just isn't going to do it. With the Meth kit you are about 180hp short of 800. There is no way a cam of any kind is going to make that kind of power increase. Also, you may want to take into consideration that you will be pushing that TKO600 beyond its limits so that will end up being a required upgrade as well sooner or later.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
May 30, 2013
#8
  • May 30, 2013
  • #8
The cam will help but I wouldn't expect huge gains with that combo... like said if a custom can causes you drivability issues some things wrong.

I figure with 17% drivetrain loss your making about 735fwhp. Are you talking 800rw or 800fw? With a more aggressive tune your meth gains could be higher I'd use a 80% mix as well.

How ported are the TFS heads? Besides adding a lot more boost your gains with a big cylinder head and proper can could yield good results.

800 can be made with a worked Holley a high port or AFR 205/225, and 20psi with a YSI or F1R blower...actually you can make well over 800.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
May 30, 2013
#9
  • May 30, 2013
  • #9
17% loss sounds a little steep for a TKO600 car don't you think? I've never seen anyone throw that much in there.

Kurt
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
May 30, 2013
#10
  • May 30, 2013
  • #10
revhead347 said:
17% loss sounds a little steep for a TKO600 car don't you think? I've never seen anyone throw that much in there.

Kurt
Click to expand...
I think 17% is pretty close with a tko the t5 was around 14-15%...those numbers I think Ron Anderson gave me years ago in NMRA P/S... it truly all depends on the entire drive line combo.

I know with no changes other then a trans we saw less HP when we went to a Tremec over the built T5...dyno was on different days and clutch disc was obviously different but conditions were as close as we could get.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
May 30, 2013
#11
  • May 30, 2013
  • #11
Rick 91GT said:
The cam will help but I wouldn't expect huge gains with that combo... like said if a custom can causes you drivability issues some things wrong.

I figure with 17% drivetrain loss your making about 735fwhp. Are you talking 800rw or 800fw? With a more aggressive tune your meth gains could be higher I'd use a 80% mix as well.

How ported are the TFS heads? Besides adding a lot more boost your gains with a big cylinder head and proper can could yield good results.

800 can be made with a worked Holley a high port or AFR 205/225, and 20psi with a YSI or F1R blower...actually you can make well over 800.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...

this right here. i think swapping out the heads and getting a larger blower will get you there if not really darn close. I think ultimately you could do it with just boosting it to all hell, but the heads will make it easier.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
May 30, 2013
#12
  • May 30, 2013
  • #12
Rick 91GT said:
I think 17% is pretty close with a tko the t5 was around 14-15%...those numbers I think Ron Anderson gave me years ago in NMRA P/S... it truly all depends on the entire drive line combo.

I know with no changes other then a trans we saw less HP when we went to a Tremec over the built T5...dyno was on different days and clutch disc was obviously different but conditions were as close as we could get.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...

I hope it's not 17%, because if it is I'm pushing my block way too hard. I usually just do 14% for a manual and 18% for an auto on average. The rotating mass in a Tremec is heavier than that in a T5, but it's almost negligible. For a dyno pull it's just the difference in the mass of the countershaft. The mass difference in the input and output is completely negligible.

Kurt
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
May 30, 2013
#13
  • May 30, 2013
  • #13
Some of the autos can be 24%

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
May 31, 2013
#14
  • May 31, 2013
  • #14
Thanks for all the info . It will take a while to make a decision. Leaning toward a cam and bigger blower, have a quiet one now and not sure I want the whine. Turbo sounds like starting over and is a little mysterious to me.
In Bowling Green ky on my way to the Hot Rod Power tour. Starting is Texas this year. Leaves Arlington, Tx. Sunday.
 
Reactions: madspeed

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Jun 1, 2013
#15
  • Jun 1, 2013
  • #15
My guess would be a lotta scratch
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Jun 5, 2013
#16
  • Jun 5, 2013
  • #16
I would agree with the YSI upgrade. I love turbos but the YSI would be an easy upgrade and would meet your power goals.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Jun 5, 2013
#17
  • Jun 5, 2013
  • #17
I agree. I would do the YSI upgrade too now that I think about it.

Kurt
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Jun 9, 2013
#18
  • Jun 9, 2013
  • #18
Thanks for the replies. Think I'll put this on hold for a while.

Discovered a few things, on the Power Cruise that I want to fix.
Nothing like a a 2700 mile cruise to put things in perspective.
You know those little irritating things that after a while drive you crazy.

Steve
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Want 35 more hp
  • Pops Fun
  • Nov 20, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
103
Views
15K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 14, 2014
Pops Fun
Third Dyno attempt 4-29-11
  • Pops Fun
  • Apr 28, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 1, 2011
Pops Fun
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?