• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Whats better C9OX or F4B

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doc Voodoo
  • Start date Start date Jun 7, 2004
D

Doc Voodoo

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
257
0
0
Conn
Jun 7, 2004
#1
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #1
Just picked up a C9OX intake at carlise. Whats the better intake the F4B I have on now or the C9OX . I am running a 289 with a comp Cam 270HR roller http://www.compcams.com/Technical/CurrentCatalog/HTML/68-75.asp , Holley 600 DP , Tri Y headers and over sized Valves 351 size that are in 289 heads.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 7, 2004
#2
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #2
i always thought they were the same intake. i have a c90x coming for my 351w that currently has an e'brock performer. if you are interested in selling either of them let me know, i recently purchased another 69 coupe and it comes with a 93 roller 5.0 short block with an x303 cam, so i'll be needing an intake and heads for it, let me know
 
D

Doc Voodoo

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
257
0
0
Conn
Jun 7, 2004
#3
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #3
Yea Sure one of them has to go LOL
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jun 7, 2004
#4
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #4
Neither one of em is enough intake for that cam, IMO....
 
D

Doc Voodoo

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
257
0
0
Conn
Jun 7, 2004
#5
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #5
Well ok but the question is which one comes close ?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 7, 2004
#6
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #6
check out this link, scroll down to ford power parts intake and it will tell you that is similar design to F4B and shelby cobra intakes, so it's really a matter of which one you like the best

http://www.jason.fletcher.net/tech/intakes/intakes.htm
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 7, 2004
#7
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #7
they definetely floe better thans the e'brock perfromer, and almost as god as most of the single plane intakes at least up to about 5500 rpm, where most dual planes start dropping off anyway, if you need a better dual plane you don't have a lot of options, either weiand stealth or performer rpm. let me know about the intakes.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 7, 2004
#8
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #8
The C90X, F4B , the newer Ford A321 and the Cobra high rise are all the same intake and every bit as good as a Performer RPM. They were used in all forms of racing with big assed cams equal to an X303 back in the 60's.
 
D

Doc Voodoo

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
257
0
0
Conn
Jun 7, 2004
#9
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #9
well it looks to me that they are super close. It also looks like as far as a duel plane goes it hung right with the single plane until the upper RPM. It is old and I am sure there has got to be something new out there that is better but it looks to me for vintage mods this is the way to go. Why is it that the C90X commands more money then the F4B ? is it all in the name ? or is there a slight diffrence.

Also if I am useing mod 289 heads they have larger intake and exaust valves . In order to get the most out of these do I have to have them port matched sine the width looks diffrent? the intake looks wider then the original head intake ports
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 7, 2004
#10
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #10
The difference is the part #. The C90X is a Factory muscle part that was available thru dealers back in the late 60's thru the early 70's. I'm running one on my V8 Ranger now and love it. Works well with a warmed up 5.0 with ported E7 heads, an F4TE high torque roller , tri-Y headers and a Holley 600.Lots of pep pulls up to valve float at 5500 rpms. I have no doubt it would do even more with a better valve train.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 7, 2004
#11
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #11
i always thought the rpm's and stealths would slightly outflow these, but i could be wrong. BTW Dhearne i did finally come up with a c90x for the 351w should be here next week. the big diff between the F4B and the C90X is that the C90X has a ford part number so it is legal for vintage racing classes that and it is a bit rarer than the F4B since it was only sold through ford dealers.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 8, 2004
#12
  • Jun 8, 2004
  • #12
bnickel said:
i always thought the rpm's and stealths would slightly outflow these, but i could be wrong. BTW Dhearne i did finally come up with a c90x for the 351w should be here next week. the big diff between the F4B and the C90X is that the C90X has a ford part number so it is legal for vintage racing classes that and it is a bit rarer than the F4B since it was only sold through ford dealers.
Click to expand...
You can also tell the Chevy boys that your motor is "all stock too" A C9OX for a Windsor is a rare find.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 8, 2004
#13
  • Jun 8, 2004
  • #13
yep the best part is that it was only 200 bucks, i have seen most them go for upwards of the 3-400. who says you can't find deals on ebay anymore
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
893
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
4
Engine Simulators
  • '46Ford
  • Sep 17, 2020
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
990
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Sep 17, 2020
'46Ford
4
Progress Thread finishing touches on my stroker build
  • doobismaximus
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 1, 2021
nickyb
C
98 V6 -> 289 engine swap
  • Cerdman
  • Dec 4, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
3K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 10, 2018
Cerdman
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?