• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

What's the definitive answer, if one?

  • Thread starter Thread starter san~man
  • Start date Start date Apr 18, 2004
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Apr 18, 2004
#1
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #1
Sorry I've been sorta MIA lately gang....just a lot of work and personal issues....

I got the itch to install some goodies again, and have read the articles and posts here and on MD about the TB/Upper intake combos.

So, for those of you more up to date than me, please enlighten me.

What's the best setup found so far, in terms of power gains and under-the-curve gains?

Where's the cheapest to buy such a combo?

What are your experiences on the combo you bought?

What dyno gains did you get, if any?

What improvement in timeslips did you gain, if any?

Let me know gang.....bring me up to date
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Apr 18, 2004
#2
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #2
coolness.. I like this thread already. I don't have the plenum/tb yet, but I did gather lots of info.

-MD article: http://www.modulardepot.com/?show=articlesdet&aid=38

-best place to buy (cheapest): http://www.crmotorsports.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=UP&Category_Code=A

-accufab plenum/TB combo gives the best result. To compare 70mm and 75mm.. the power under curve are very similar. peak hp gain wise, 70mm > 75mm

IMO, it would be better if Matt tested 70mm and 75mm in the same day though. Oh well.. maybe someone else will do it.
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Apr 18, 2004
#3
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #3
there were 2 independent tests done, and both times, the accufab came out on top.
 
S

stimmler

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2002
248
0
17
Japan
Apr 18, 2004
#4
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #4
I went with the accufab setup partly because of matt's writeup and because of fit and finish. It is a little more pricey but just like accufab tb's you get what you pay for. Just put mine on on friday and there is a noticable gain throughout the curve. Haven't dynoed. Very happy with it.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Apr 18, 2004
#5
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #5
If I could go back, I'd get the Accufab plenum. It looks 500000x better than the C&L I have and outperformed the C&L in the tests that Matt did.
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Apr 18, 2004
#6
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #6
JonJon said:
If I could go back, I'd get the Accufab plenum. It looks 500000x better than the C&L I have and outperformed the C&L in the tests that Matt did.
Click to expand...
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Apr 18, 2004
#7
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #7
Cool, so nothings changed since then. Thanks all.
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Apr 20, 2004
#8
  • Apr 20, 2004
  • #8
Forgot to ask....

Did the Accufab with the 75mm TB peform better than the AFplenum with the 70mm TB?
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Apr 20, 2004
#9
  • Apr 20, 2004
  • #9
san~man said:
Forgot to ask....

Did the Accufab with the 75mm TB peform better than the AFplenum with the 70mm TB?
Click to expand...

The Accufab with the 70 mm combo gained 7.94 rwhp and 7.6 rwtq.

The Accufab with the 75 mm combo gained 6.31 rwhp and 6.88 rwtq.

Keep in mind that this was on a stock GT. Start adding mods and the 75 mm will probably prove to be better.
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Apr 20, 2004
#10
  • Apr 20, 2004
  • #10
01mgvert said:
The Accufab with the 70 mm combo gained 7.94 rwhp and 7.6 rwtq.

The Accufab with the 75 mm combo gained 6.31 rwhp and 6.88 rwtq.

Keep in mind that this was on a stock GT. Start adding mods and the 75 mm will probably prove to be better.
Click to expand...

Did I read the article right?

I read that the second test was done with the stock upper plenum and the original Acccufab 70mm TB. Did I read wrong?

A quote..."Matt's car had the Accufab 70mm throttle body and plenum from the last test, so a stock unported plenum was aquired to get a fair comparison to stock. Below is a graph of all three baseline runs along with the best run by itself. There were 3 runs for each plenum."

Also, the baseline dyno number changed from test one to test 2.

Fill me in, and on where's the cheapest place to buy the combo....

Thanks again
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
S
My 95 v6 to v8 conversion project. Advice needed
  • Stangzpride
  • Jul 27, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 30, 2018
Stangzpride
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?