• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Whats the difference between an suv 4.6 and a mustang 4.6?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SilverBullet00
  • Start date Start date Dec 9, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Dec 11, 2006
#21
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #21
Duke309 said:
what exactly is the benefit of doing this swap other than getting a lower mileage motor?
Click to expand...

Weight of the AL block
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 11, 2006
#22
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #22
1Bad96 said:
1895 sounds kinda high for a stock explorer motor
Click to expand...

I actually didn't think it sounded that bad. Remember, the previously well kept secret of the Explorers sporting an aluminum block isn't so well kept anymore. Now, every Non-PI guy and and later model PI guys and their mother with a tired engine in their Ford or Mercury sporting a 4.6L is looking for one as their replacment engine now. These engines only had a 4-year run, so they're in pretty high demand.
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
Dec 11, 2006
#23
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #23
I thought the price sounded pretty good. It only has 600 miles on the motor w/ an AL b- I could see the short block costing that much. the only thing that concerns me is actually doing the swap..
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
Dec 13, 2006
#24
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #24
Ok, I noticed two things about the explorer motor by doing some research-

A) It has a different oil filter adapter. It puts the oil filter in front of the lower rad hose connection. I figure I can just swap adapters from my block to the new block.

B) Its timing cover is way different- not a huge deal, but can I run my timing cover instead? It uses less idler pullies and looks cleaner IMO...
 
J

jon595

New Member
Nov 23, 2006
15
0
0
FL
Dec 13, 2006
#25
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #25
I'm going through this now on my 98 GT. Engine is a 2004 Explorer 4.6, 21,000 miles, paid $1200 for it.

1. The timing cover is different. It's missing the boss to mount your power steering pump. It also has a bolt hole in a different location than any mustang cover. It's to the right of the water pump, I'm using a F6AE cover and using it as a guide to drill into the block 3/8" and install a heli-coil and put a stud there.
2. The oil pan is different. And the oil pump pick up. I drilled through the spot welds from the Explorer oil pan and took the crank scrapers out, and welded them into a FRPP mustang pan. Also swapped out the oil pump & pick up for the FRPP Cobra model, installed the windage tray also.
3. Even though the intake manifold is a PI version, there is no provision to extract water out of the rear passenger side head like on a Mustang. Bought a new one from Kar Kraft. The thermostat cover is pointing the wrong way.
4. You need a Mustang heater tube. The Exploder has an extra tube coming off of it.
5. Oil filter adapter is totally wrong. Using my old one.
6. Valve covers must be changed for my old ones.
7. Exhaust manifolds are different.
8. Still need to see if the Exploder water pump is the same as my year model (long or short).

Not as easy as people make it out to be!
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
Dec 13, 2006
#26
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #26
Damn man, thanks for the info. If I used my current timing cover, Would I still need to drill into the block? And I know the oil pan was different, I was thinking I would add a windage tray and use my stock mustang oil pan. I was hoping the lower intake would be the same, but i guess its not...

and what do you mean by a mustang heater tube? And where does the explorer block have one? Could it be blocked off? Any why do you need new valve covers?
 
J

jon595

New Member
Nov 23, 2006
15
0
0
FL
Dec 13, 2006
#27
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #27
If you used your timing cover one of the attaching cover bolts has been moved. I'm picking up a earlier style cover tommorow, F3AE, and think this might be an option (for me at least). I really do not want to drill into the block.

The heater tube I mentioned is the metal tube that goes to the back of the water pump. It travels down the valley and exits at the rear of the block. The Explorer's has 2 outlets in it at the back of the block. Mustang has a single outlet. I guess it could be soldered off (blocked). I just bought a new one.

By putting my old valve covers on I do not have to re-route any of the emissions stuff or block of the the extra pvc tube. My old engine is a Romeo so it just makes sense to me. The Exploder's oil fill is elevated and on the wrong side (passenger side)!

Will report back tommorow about the old style cover.
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
Dec 13, 2006
#28
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #28
Thats great man, thans a lot. Also, do you have any ways of taking pictures so I can see what doesnt match up?
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
Dec 14, 2006
#29
  • Dec 14, 2006
  • #29
I have been talking to some people on a couple other forums and they seem to be against the idea of doing the swap... what do you guys think?
 
J

jon595

New Member
Nov 23, 2006
15
0
0
FL
Dec 14, 2006
#30
  • Dec 14, 2006
  • #30
Update:
The F3EA thru F5EA timing cover is the correct one for 96-98 engine swaps. It has the power steering pump boss, small mounting holes all around like the explorer engine, AND it has the mounting hole to the right of the water pump in the correct location! NO MODIFICATIONS NEEDED!!!!!

Other differences between the SUV engine and Mustang engine.
1. Heavier duty crankshaft
2. Full floating piston pins
3. 4 bolt mains w/ 2 side bolts
4. NPI engines will get the better heads, crank dampener, crank gear, and crank timing wheel.
5. And being 80 lbs lighter it will always be faster E.T. wise. Been there.
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
Dec 14, 2006
#31
  • Dec 14, 2006
  • #31
hey man, do you have any ability to take some pictures of the motor and all the timing covers you have tried? Im really curious!
 
J

jon595

New Member
Nov 23, 2006
15
0
0
FL
Dec 14, 2006
#32
  • Dec 14, 2006
  • #32
http://www.babcox.com/editorial/ar/80423chart.pdf

I can take pics this weekend.
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
Dec 15, 2006
#33
  • Dec 15, 2006
  • #33
sweet man, I would really love some pictures. If you would rather e-mail them to me, just let me know and I will give you my email address.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
91
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
L
2004 Mustang GT issues after bolt-ons added
  • Leo090
  • Nov 1, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 24, 2025
Leo090
L
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
940
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Fox 329 HP low for a stroker?
  • Andresquintana.mma
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 19, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?