• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

whats the down falls to a 351 clevland

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wootdog
  • Start date Start date Dec 13, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

jes72mustang

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
224
1
0
S. Central PA
Dec 15, 2005
#41
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #41
All the information you could ever want to know about clevelands can be found on this board:

http://www.network54.com/Forum/119419/

There is a lot of experience in building them strong and powerful here. I don't know maybe it is just me, but as I was looking for my mustang, I found that far more of the 351s used in the classic stangs were Clevelands. I have one in my 72 and it hasn't been rebuilt and it has plenty of low-end. Parts are hard to come by and they are more expensive because of that. It just adds to the fun and the challenge.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Dec 15, 2005
#42
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #42
brianj5600 said:
And all but one got beat by a Chevy motor!
I wonder why all the hard core racing developement uses cleveland heads and more street oriented developement was on windsor based heads. Maybe a small block running less than 6500 rpms does not need 2.19 intake valves and huge ports. Maybe big valves and ports are best for a street driven car and a more usable powerband would result. I wonder how much torque and hp I would gain if I got rid of my AFR 185s and put on some stock Cleveland heads?
Click to expand...
The Engine Masters competition limited the Cleveland-headed motors to a lower deck height than every other competitor. It's a typical way a competition like this is run - the magazine wants one of their biggest sponsors to win. They wanted the Chevy to win so they allowed the Chevy (and Windsor style Fords) to have the higher decks. Kaase "cheated" within the rules by running a thick copper "head gasket" and equalizing the deck height. This might have had something to do with his winning, but the sponsors changed the rules to make sure the Cleveland wouldn't easily win again.

Comparing new aftermarket heads to 30 year old technology is hardly fair, but I wouldn't be surprised if an engine with stock Cleveland heads made more hp and torque than an engine running AFR 185s. And a little work on the Cleveland heads will get you good gains.

Anyway, I think that running a Windsor engine is a great idea - much better than a small block Chev.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Cobra Brake Conversion - Spare Wheel/Tire Search
  • AeroCoupe
  • Sunday at 5:40 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
43
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sunday at 5:40 PM
AeroCoupe
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
656
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
703
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 17, 2026
fasterthangas
F
M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
299
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
5
Foxbody Intro
  • 5.0Sucio
  • May 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
115
The Welcome Wagon May 26, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?