• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

When is it necessary to use a scattershield?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wickedmach1
  • Start date Start date Dec 18, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
W

wickedmach1

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
376
0
0
Austin, TX
Dec 18, 2004
#1
  • Dec 18, 2004
  • #1
I am building a 393 stroker and thinking about a Tremec TKO 600 tranny. The engine will produce around 500 - 530 HP at the flywheel. It won't be too high revving of an engine. I figure around 6000 - 6500 for the street. I have heard 7000 RPM or more is the magic number. When is it a good idea to use a scattershield over the aluminum bellhousing?
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Dec 18, 2004
#2
  • Dec 18, 2004
  • #2
I would say with your powerlevels to use one. I mean, it's cheap insurance for your legs right?
 

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
Dec 19, 2004
#3
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #3
i would get one just in case, better than having peices of a clutch in your legs
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Dec 19, 2004
#4
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #4
Any time you value your feet more than your $$$, that's when you should get a scattershield IMO.

Especially since you're going to get a Tremec and need a bellhousing anyways, you really should be buying a scattershield.
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 19, 2004
#5
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #5
Yes use one.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Dec 19, 2004
#6
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #6
Yes, use one and a suggestion on how to save a few bucks.

Locate a late '60s or early '70s V-8 Ford pick up as they used a nodular bellhousing which is actually better than modern day aftermarket versions.

You can pick these up at any salvage yard that has been around a few years and get one for a "song and dance".

This is what I have run in my car since day one as I value my toes, feet and legs. If you have ever seen a clutch and flywheel explode you become an instant believer.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Dec 20, 2004
#7
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #7
My uncle had his flywheel come apart after a missed powershift in his 71 mach 1.

FRICKEN SCARY! It damn near cut that car apart! Pieces of metal were embedded in the asphault.

Definately get one!
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Dec 20, 2004
#8
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #8
i too hav eseen first hand the results of a clutch explosion, and i highly recomend a scattershield in your application. it is more than just rpm that dictates the need for a scattershield. horsepower and parts selection as well as use also tell you if you need a scattershield.
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Dec 21, 2004
#9
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #9
Will the truck bellhousing will mate-up to a tremec 3550? If I can find one I'd be willing to install it when I change my slipping clutch in the spring.
 
C

Cbarton

New Member
Feb 27, 2003
176
0
0
Santa Ana, CA
Dec 21, 2004
#10
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #10
DO NOT SKIMP ON SAFETY PARTS. Historic, you should know better. An factory truck bellhousing is better than an SFI rated STEEL scattershield? Not for my health and safety. If you're going to do it....do it right, not half-assed.

Chris Barton


jikelly said:
Will the truck bellhousing will mate-up to a tremec 3550? If I can find one I'd be willing to install it when I change my slipping clutch in the spring.
Click to expand...
 
F

fastcoupe68

Member
Mar 10, 2004
368
0
17
nj
Dec 21, 2004
#11
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #11
If you ever plan on taking the car to a NHRA or IHRA track you need an SFI approved bellhousing, dont even think of using anything else!! I dont care what it came out of. Lakewood makes a beautiful one just for your application with the tremec.
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Dec 21, 2004
#12
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #12
Not too long after the C5 Corvettes came out there was a picture circulating the net (especially the so cal region) where I guy tried a high rpm launch with slicks on and the flywheel actually cut up through the dash. The teeth of the ring gear of the flywheel were sticking up through the top visible from the passenger compartment
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Dec 21, 2004
#13
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #13
Cbarton, A Ford nodular iron bellhousing is stronger than any aftermarker scattershield. I keep trying to tell you guys that the automakers spend millions off dollars testing their parts.

A standard bellhousing is no good in performance situations - a nodular iron is just fine and it fact it weighs more than the type you mentioned. I give up the few extra pounds for a safer "scattershield". I have actually seen parts come through the aftermarket style.

Oh, by the way, the NASCAR boys do not even use a scattershield.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com

 
F

fastcoupe68

Member
Mar 10, 2004
368
0
17
nj
Dec 21, 2004
#14
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #14
The factory pieces are not approved by either the NHRA or the IHRA they will not pass SFI specs, and the nascar guys certainly are not using a cast piece to hold there stuff together.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Dec 21, 2004
#15
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #15
fastcoupe68 said:
The factory pieces are not approved by either the NHRA or the IHRA they will not pass SFI specs, and the nascar guys certainly are not using a cast piece to hold there stuff together.
Click to expand...

fast, then what are the NASCAR boys using? (I know the answer)

Also, the bellhousing from the trucks in the late sixties were not cast. They are nodular.

By the way NHRA and IHRA get a "kickback" on every unit sold..............just more hype to buy stuff!

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com

 

degins

Member
Sep 18, 2004
361
0
17
Texas
Dec 21, 2004
#16
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #16
HistoricMustang said:
fast, then what are the NASCAR boys using? (I know the answer)

Also, the bellhousing from the trucks in the late sixties were not cast. They are nodular.

By the way NHRA and IHRA get a "kickback" on every unit sold..............just more hype to buy stuff!

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com

Click to expand...



Nodular iron is cast iron. The "nodular" in nodular iron refers to the form of the grahphite particals contained in the iron. The particals are spherical (nodular) as opposed to the flake form typical of ordinary cast iron. Nodular iron, more correctly known as "ductile" iron is ~30% stronger, but not as strong as steel.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Dec 21, 2004
#17
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #17
Historic how do you know the factory nodular stuff is stronger?

I definitely agree it would be heavier, but I don't know about stronger. I wouldn't say that because it is from a factory vehicle it is the best. They wouldn't design a super-dooper Titanium scattershield if the vehicle it is for is going to make 250hp and be marketed at making towing the kids around easier. They build for adequate safety and cheapest cost vs selling price. I would wager that dedicated performance aftermarket companies would spend more research on maximum strength, weight reduction etc.

Big clutches and high rpms are what give the clutch pieces enough energy to tear apart and drive through the car and chop feet off. Trucks and almost all factory cars are limited to low and moderate rpm.

As for NASCAR, all the stuff I found said steel factory bellhousing required or steel blanket around other type.

not trying to "flame" or get your blood pressure up, this is just how my logic sees it.
 
F

fastcoupe68

Member
Mar 10, 2004
368
0
17
nj
Dec 21, 2004
#18
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #18
HistoricMustang said:
fast, then what are the NASCAR boys using? (I know the answer)

Also, the bellhousing from the trucks in the late sixties were not cast. They are nodular.

By the way NHRA and IHRA get a "kickback" on every unit sold..............just more hype to buy stuff!

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com

Click to expand...
Please enlighten me, what are the nascar boys running? Could it be aluminum? How about Steel!!!! Not cast!!!
Nodular=cast
Every unit of what?
Nascar rules, All nascar approved aluminum bellhousings must have enclosed clutch assemblys if not you must have a nascar approved scatter blanket. How is that Mr. Nascar? Tell the Boys I said Hi.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Dec 22, 2004
#19
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #19
666, here you go. Let me know when you are done so I can give the "pop -quiz":

http://www7.taosnet.com/ebear/metal/heattreat7.html

68, very good. I did not know the particulars but do remember not seeing what looked like a scattershield the short time I was around the Winston Cup cars. I do also remember what looked like a rubber padding in the drive shaft tunnel to slow down anything that might get that far.

Having said all of that, they simply do not have clutch failures.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Dec 22, 2004
#20
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #20
Cast materials are generally more rigid than forged or rolled materials. It's like glass is more rigid than rubber. Rigidity may not be the most important thing in a scattershield, I expect. A material that can bend and give - absorbing / spreading out the impact - will probably work better than a rigid material that will shatter on impact.

I don't know anything about scattershield design, but specs and properties can be deceptive. A cast bell might show a higher modulus of elasticity, but the mode of failure is cracking rather than bending. I expect ductile materials would be far superior for absorbing and stopping shrapnel.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
781
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
589
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?