• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Where ecactly does the GT40 lower need port work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zero Signal
  • Start date Start date Sep 22, 2005

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Sep 22, 2005
#1
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #1
I was looking at the thing and I didn't see anything that would cause it to be very restrictive like people say. Where is the port work usually done when you guys get them back? Are the runners just opened all around or what?
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Sep 23, 2005
#2
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #2
The way Tmoss explained it and showed me the restriction is on the sides walls of the ports. If you take a drop light you can see the runners tapper in on the sides. He pointed out that on the back runners that are the straightest they actually have more restriction as both sides tapper in making it flow less, as the rest mostly have just one side or the other that has the tapper. Make small/even "cuts" to blend the wall to take out the tapper that restricts.

BTW-Tmoss that was still and will allways be in my head what you showed me when you ported mine, thanks for doing it and letting me watch .
 
H

homerojr

New Member
Dec 2, 2002
74
0
0
Sep 23, 2005
#3
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #3
I´ve ported mine according to Tmoss instructions. If you tell me how to post pics, I can post some nice pics of the lower manifold, gasket matched to slightly worked AFR165 heads.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 23, 2005
#4
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #4
blksn955.o - it was my pleasure. The idea is not to take the taper totally out, but to change the taper and particularly to smooth the short side transition to the head flange. opening up the runner on the long side for a larger head runner needs special attention to match the wall transition on that side too. Reshaping the transitions in the bends and making the cross section flow more effective is what it's all about.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Sep 23, 2005
#5
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #5
Ok, kind of what I was thinking. Thanks guys!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Replace the entire AC charge port
  • from6to8
  • Feb 22, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
295
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 22, 2025
from6to8
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
696
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
A
need help and advise
  • amps1956
  • Oct 14, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
16
Views
599
Other Auto Tech Oct 21, 2025
Mcmahst
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
684
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?