• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Which Cylinder Heads?...if Money Were No Object

  • Thread starter Thread starter WhiteCobra95
  • Start date Start date Aug 19, 2014

WhiteCobra95

10 Year Member
May 2, 2006
634
177
74
Aug 19, 2014
#1
  • Aug 19, 2014
  • #1
A good number of the posts I read in here regarding cylinder head upgrades usually revolve around limited budgets and the best affordable head alternatives such as iron GT40s vs. ported E7s, or GT40 vs. GT40p. For anyone that's interested, here's a question I would like to pose regarding Windsor-based cylinder heads, partly for fun and partly out of genuine interest.

If money were no object, which cylinder heads would you buy for your SN95 build?

Of course, a question this big can't be asked without some detailed qualifiers attached. Here are the restrictions and limitations:
  • Windsor engine build for an SN95 with associated SN95 hardware restrictions.
  • Naturally aspirated only.
  • The vehicle application is street/strip, with mostly street driving, and has to be
    capable of being used as a daily driver.
  • The stock ECU has to be used, but it can be tuned.
  • 3.55 or 3.73 rear gears with MT, but doesn't necessarily have to be a T5.
  • Intake manifold and camshaft can be specified to match the cylinder head selection.
  • H or X pipe with cats in order to keep it street legal, but the rest of exhaust can be changed up to match the HCI selection.
(Please let me know if there are any other things that I missed which need to be spelled out here.)
​
To keep this even more interesting, it would be great to hear what you would choose for the following engine combinations:
5.0 / 302, 331 (stroker), 351, and 427 (351 stroker)​
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Aug 19, 2014
#2
  • Aug 19, 2014
  • #2
Afr 165 or 185 for 302
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Aug 19, 2014
#3
  • Aug 19, 2014
  • #3
Depends on what kind of engine you are building. I would go for a big Trick Flow head myself if I had to buy heads again tomorrow.

Kurt
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Aug 19, 2014
#4
  • Aug 19, 2014
  • #4
revhead347 said:
Depends on what kind of engine you are building. I would go for a big Trick Flow head myself if I had to buy heads again tomorrow.

Kurt
Click to expand...
You like em better than an AFR?
 

85rkyboby

Active Member
Mar 2, 2011
923
96
39
South ATL
Aug 20, 2014
#5
  • Aug 20, 2014
  • #5
What's the deal with Dart & Brodix heads? They're fairly expensive. Are they any better than AFR or TF?
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Aug 20, 2014
#6
  • Aug 20, 2014
  • #6
Yeah, I like the Trick Flow design better than the AFR heads.

Brodix makes full on racing heads.

Kurt
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby

WhiteCobra95

10 Year Member
May 2, 2006
634
177
74
Aug 20, 2014
#7
  • Aug 20, 2014
  • #7
85rkyboby said:
What's the deal with Dart & Brodix heads? They're fairly expensive. Are they any better than AFR or TF?
Click to expand...

I'm curious about the Brodix heads as well. They have impressive flow numbers with reasonable port sizes, but they're priced like big block heads at $2k+. Are they worth the money for a mostly street driven car or are they mainly intended for a 302 race engine? Would they be better suited for a street driven 427 stroker than AFR 185s?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 21, 2014
#8
  • Aug 21, 2014
  • #8
If money were no object, I'd pick up a set of emmisons legal 60cc AFR Renegade 185's (1492's) and have them CNC cut to the 205 specs for my 331.

From what I've seen, the components and machine work for the new AFR Renegade line up seem to be better than that of the TFS heads. The consensus I've read amongst a lot of the racers on the TFS heads seems to be that their quality control has really taken a hit since they were bought out by Summit a few years back?

As for which one performs better....that seems to depend on who you ask. From what I've seen, they're pretty much on par with one and other.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Aug 21, 2014
#9
  • Aug 21, 2014
  • #9
AFR 165 on stock 302.
AFR 185 on a 331.
AFR 185 or 205 on 347.

AFR 185's on 347 with custom Comp cam, Holley Systemax Intake with ported throttle body outlet, ported elbow, 75MM Throttle body, 80MM MAF, 30lb Injectors, 1-3/4" Ceramic Long Tube Headers with 3" collector, 3" Prochamber, 3" Catback exhaust. I should have went 205's and 38lb injectors.





 

Attachments

  • CHP2.webp
    54.6 KB · Views: 376
  • CHP.webp
    50 KB · Views: 468
  • Motor12-29-05.webp
    47.6 KB · Views: 242

WhiteCobra95

10 Year Member
May 2, 2006
634
177
74
Aug 21, 2014
#10
  • Aug 21, 2014
  • #10
VibrantRedGT said:
AFR 185's on 347 with custom Comp cam, Holley Systemax Intake with ported throttle body outlet, ported elbow, 75MM Throttle body, 80MM MAF, 30lb Injectors, 1-3/4" Ceramic Long Tube Headers with 3" collector, 3" Prochamber, 3" Catback exhaust. I should have went 205's and 38lb injectors.
Click to expand...

Dude, that engine looks awesome! I imagine that thing pulls pretty hard. Nice!
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Aug 22, 2014
#11
  • Aug 22, 2014
  • #11
Would pull harder with AFR 205's, bigger injector and recal MAF. Maybe even ditch the Holley intake for a higher RPM range one. I like torque though.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Aug 22, 2014
#12
  • Aug 22, 2014
  • #12
Gearbanger 101 said:
The consensus I've read amongst a lot of the racers on the TFS heads seems to be that their quality control has really taken a hit since they were bought out by Summit a few years back?
Click to expand...

That's partially true. They are living in the long long ago. Back in the mid 90s when Summit bought Trick Flow, their quality control and hardware did take a hit. Back then we only bought Trick Flow bare castings. Trick Flow has long since improved their hardware selection and packages. AFR heads are always an excellent choice. They are second to none in quality and customer service.

Kurt
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,102
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Aug 22, 2014
#13
  • Aug 22, 2014
  • #13
back in the day, money was close to no object. I have AFR205s on my 331. I could have done more, but at that point I think I would have seen extremely diminishing returns for the investment.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,974
2,956
194
Middle of Maine
Aug 22, 2014
#14
  • Aug 22, 2014
  • #14
In my application which does not meet the criteria here, I went with the AFR Renegade 220 heads. Very nice indeed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
734
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
910
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
J
Fox body - godzilla, coyote, or 408w stroker - Best route for budget build?
  • jaygee15
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2025
2000xp8
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?