• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Which Edelbrock pakage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter no_3
  • Start date Start date May 2, 2004
N

no_3

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2002
73
0
0
May 2, 2004
#1
  • May 2, 2004
  • #1
Now I've got my 351w short wiating for a top end what do I get?

I like the Packages that Edelbrock offer because I don't have the experience to go picking individual components.

My car is almost a daily driver, a couple of times a week, somtimes in traffic.

If I go Torker will I be sacrificing driveability, if I go performer is it too boring?

Also can I put a single plane Torker manifold with perfomer rpm heads?
 

NorCal66

New Member
Aug 12, 2003
334
0
0
Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA HOME
May 2, 2004
#2
  • May 2, 2004
  • #2
Yea, torker would definately not be too fun on the street. Performer gives better low end according to edelbrock (idle-5500) while Performer RPM gives you more power and a better curve, except you have to wait til 1500 to get it...IMO that's a pretty easy choice if you want better performance. Right now I have the RPM cam and intake, but no heads and streetability is fine. Damn I need those heads...

Anything single plane on the street is gonna hurt the stop and go driving experience
 
R

Red66GT

New Member
Jul 14, 2003
214
0
0
Simi Valley, CA
May 3, 2004
#3
  • May 3, 2004
  • #3
NorCal66 said:
Anything single plane on the street is gonna hurt the stop and go driving experience
Click to expand...

Out of curiosity, what do you mean by this exactly?
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
May 3, 2004
#4
  • May 3, 2004
  • #4
Red66GT said:
Out of curiosity, what do you mean by this exactly?
Click to expand...
It won't make a good amount of torque at the bottom end. Every time you take off it will fell like it take forever to build power.
No_3 I would touch that intake (torker) in any case. The rpm or rpm air gap will make much more torque and still even more hp.
Edelbrocks package are nice in that reason though, just pick what hp package you want. And they will make that if everything else is up to par.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
699
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Today at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
M
Engine 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
496
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 28, 2025
Mustang5L5
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Tuesday at 4:25 PM
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?